World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
47500
World Ranking
9885
National Ranking
5086

Ronit Katz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronit Katz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 412 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronit Katz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronit Katz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronit Katz is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research mainly spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Nephrology. Additional areas of study include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Genetics.

Their work covers a range of topics connected to kidney health and related conditions. These include Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Vitamin D Research Studies, Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies, and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments.

Ronit Katz has contributed to numerous publications, appearing frequently in key journals such as:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Kidney Medicine
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Ronit Katz include:

  • From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence
  • Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR and Associations With Frailty and Adverse Outcomes: A Cohort Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), 2020, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Urine Markers of Kidney Tubule Cell Injury and Kidney Function Decline in SPRINT Trial Participants with CKD, 2020, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR and Incident Frailty: An Analysis of the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), 2020, American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Frequent collaborators in Ronit Katz's research include:

  • Joachim H. Ix
  • Michael G. Shlipak
  • Alexander L. Bullen
  • Orlando M. Gutiérrez
  • Pranav S. Garimella

Best Publications

  • Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Theo Vos;Ryan M. Barber;Brad Bell;Amelia Bertozzi-Villa

  • From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.

    Scott M. Lundberg;Scott M. Lundberg;Gabriel Erion;Hugh Chen;Alex DeGrave

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons.

    Michael G. Shlipak;Mark J. Sarnak;Ronit Katz;Linda F. Fried

  • Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function.

    Michael G. Shlipak;Kunihiro Matsushita;Johan Ärnlöv;Johan Ärnlöv;Lesley A. Inker

  • Cystatin C and Prognosis for Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes in Elderly Persons without Chronic Kidney Disease

    Michael G. Shlipak;Ronit Katz;Mark J. Sarnak;Linda F. Fried

  • Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease

    Anna Köttgen;Nicole L. Glazer;Abbas Dehghan;Shih Jen Hwang

  • A prospective study of anemia status, hemoglobin concentration, and mortality in an elderly cohort: the Cardiovascular Health Study.

    Neil A. Zakai;Ronit Katz;Calvin H Hirsch;Michael G. Shlipak

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Relationship of Uric Acid With Progression of Kidney Disease

    Michel Chonchol;Michael G. Shlipak;Ronit Katz;Mark J. Sarnak

  • Rapid kidney function decline and mortality risk in older adults.

    Dena E. Rifkin;Michael G. Shlipak;Ronit Katz;Linda F. Fried

  • Cystatin C Concentration as a Risk Factor for Heart Failure in Older Adults

    Mark J. Sarnak;Ronit Katz;Catherine O. Stehman-Breen;Linda F. Fried

  • Mortality and Cardiovascular Risk Across the Ankle-Arm Index Spectrum Results From the Cardiovascular Health Study

    Ann M. O’Hare;Ronit Katz;Michael G. Shlipak;Mary Cushman

  • Rapid Decline of Kidney Function Increases Cardiovascular Risk in the Elderly

    Michael G. Shlipak;Ronit Katz;Bryan Kestenbaum;David Siscovick

  • Fibroblast growth factor-23 and death, heart failure, and cardiovascular events in community-living individuals: CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study).

    Joachim H. Ix;Ronit Katz;Bryan R. Kestenbaum;Ian H. de Boer

  • Kidney Function as a Predictor of Noncardiovascular Mortality

    Linda F. Fried;Linda F. Fried;Ronit Katz;Mark J. Sarnak;Michael G. Shlipak

  • Features of the Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes Mellitus as Predictors of Aortic Valve Calcification in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

    Ronit Katz;Nathan D. Wong;Richard Kronmal;Junichiro Takasu

  • Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and cardiovascular events among older adults.

    Bryan Kestenbaum;Ronit Katz;Ian de Boer;Andy Hoofnagle

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States (vol 69, pg s7, 2017)

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C Abbott;Lawrence Yc Agodoa

  • Cystatin C and the Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events Among Elderly Persons

    M.G. Shilpak;M.J. Sarnak;R. Katz

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. Shlipak
Michael G. Shlipak University of California, San Francisco
Joachim H. Ix
Joachim H. Ix University of California, San Diego
Mark J. Sarnak
Mark J. Sarnak Tufts Medical Center
David S. Siscovick
David S. Siscovick University of Washington
Bryan Kestenbaum
Bryan Kestenbaum University of Washington
Ian H. de Boer
Ian H. de Boer University of Washington
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Linda F. Fried
Linda F. Fried University of Pittsburgh
Carmen A. Peralta
Carmen A. Peralta University of California, San Francisco
Anne B. Newman
Anne B. Newman University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals in the USA aren’t limited to the traditional MD route. There are a range of alternative healthcare careers you can pursue through flexible online degree programs. Exploring these options can save time and money while still leading to a rewarding position in the medical field.

For those interested in pharmacy, many online pharm d programs provide a convenient path to advanced qualifications without the need to relocate. If data and patient records intrigue you, consider online rhit degree programs focused on health information management.

Medical coding offers a fast route into healthcare and is in high demand. You can learn more about what to expect and how much does it cost to become a medical coder online. For registered nurses aiming to advance their practice, the cheapest np programs online can make career advancement more affordable and accessible.

These online programs offer flexibility and affordability, helping you enter or progress in the healthcare sector with less financial and logistical stress.

Best Scientists Citing Ronit Katz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles