World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
16728
World Ranking
2697
National Ranking
1551

David J. Schretlen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Schretlen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David J. Schretlen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Schretlen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David J. Schretlen is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, and Neurology.

The scientist's research topics encompass various areas including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

David J. Schretlen has contributed to multiple publications, frequently appearing in these venues:

  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Assessment
  • Revista de Neurología

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Schretlen include:

  • "A multimodal approach to studying the relationship between peripheral glutathione, brain glutamate, and cognition in health and in schizophrenia," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Deep Brain Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Case Report," 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • "Improving the predictive potential of diffusion MRI in schizophrenia using normative models-Towards subject-level classification," 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • "Investigating Sexual Dimorphism of Human White Matter in a Harmonized, Multisite Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study," 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Cognitive deficits, clinical variables, and white matter microstructure in schizophrenia: a multisite harmonization study," 2022, Molecular Psychiatry

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Akira Sawa
  • Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
  • Amanda E. Lyall
  • Godfrey D. Pearlson
  • Carol A. Tamminga

In recognition of professional achievements, David J. Schretlen was awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised: Normative data and analysis of inter-form and test–retest reliability.

    Ralph H.B. Benedict;David Schretlen;Lowell Groninger;Jason Brandt

  • A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning.

    David J. Schretlen;Anne M. Shapiro

  • Revision of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test: Studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity.

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;David Schretlen;Lowell Groninger;Melissa Dobraski

  • Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised

    Anne M. Shapiro;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Ralph H.B. Benedict;David Schretlen;Jason Brandt

  • Source‐based morphometry: The use of independent component analysis to identify gray matter differences with application to schizophrenia

    Lai Xu;Karyn M. Groth;Godfrey Pearlson;David J. Schretlen

  • Hopkins Verbal Learning Test--Revised

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;David Schretlen;Lowell Groninger;Jason Brandt

  • Increased occupancy of dopamine receptors in human striatum during cue-elicited cocaine craving.

    Dean F. Wong;Dean F. Wong;Hiroto Kuwabara;David J. Schretlen;Katherine R. Bonson;Katherine R. Bonson

  • Neuropsychological Functioning in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

    David J. Schretlen;Nicola G. Cascella;Stephen M. Meyer;Lisle R. Kingery

  • Delineation of the motor disorder of Lesch-Nyhan disease

    H. A. Jinnah;Jasper E. Visser;James C. Harris;Alfonso Verdu;Alfonso Verdu

  • Mechanisms of Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Neurotransmission in Tourette Syndrome : Clues from an In Vivo Neurochemistry Study with PET

    Dean F. Wong;James R. Brašić;Harvey S. Singer;David J. Schretlen

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

    Rosalind J. Sadleir;Tracy D. Vannorsdall;David J. Schretlen;Barry Gordon

  • Elucidating the contributions of processing speed, executive ability, and frontal lobe volume to normal age-related differences in fluid intelligence.

    David Schretlen;Godfrey D. Pearlson;James C. Anthony;Elizabeth H. Aylward

  • Group Cognitive Therapy and Alprazolam in the Treatment of Depression in Older Adults

    Larry E. Beutler;Forrest Scogin;Patricia Kirkish;David Schretlen

  • Is aberrant functional connectivity a psychosis endophenotype? A resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Sabin Khadka;Shashwath A. Meda;Michael C. Stevens;David C. Glahn;David C. Glahn

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging White Matter Endophenotypes in Patients With Schizophrenia or Psychotic Bipolar Disorder and Their Relatives

    Pawel Skudlarski;David J. Schretlen;Gunvant K. Thaker;Michael C. Stevens

  • Serum uric acid and brain ischemia in normal elderly adults

    D. J. Schretlen;A. B. Inscore;T. D. Vannorsdall;M. Kraut

  • The use of psychological tests to identify malingered symptoms of mental disorder

    David J. Schretlen

  • Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing.

    David J. Schretlen;S. Marc Testa;Jessica M. Winicki;Godfrey D. Pearlson

  • The utility of regression-based norms in interpreting the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS).

    Brett A. Parmenter;S. Marc Testa;David J. Schretlen;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman

  • Examining the range of normal intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance.

    David J. Schretlen;Cynthia A. Munro;James C. Anthony;Godfrey D. Pearlson

  • Hippocampal and ventricular volumes in psychotic and nonpsychotic bipolar patients compared with schizophrenia patients and community control subjects: a pilot study.

    Heather C. Strasser;Heather C. Strasser;Jessica Lilyestrom;Jessica Lilyestrom;Ebony R. Ashby;Ebony R. Ashby;Nancy A. Honeycutt;Nancy A. Honeycutt

Frequent Co-Authors

Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Barry Gordon
Barry Gordon Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Akira Sawa
Akira Sawa Johns Hopkins University
Hyder A. Jinnah
Hyder A. Jinnah Emory University
Jason Brandt
Jason Brandt Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Matcheri S. Keshavan
Matcheri S. Keshavan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Dean F. Wong
Dean F. Wong Washington University in St. Louis
John A. Sweeney
John A. Sweeney University of Cincinnati
Carol A. Tamminga
Carol A. Tamminga The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online education and career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming licensed counselors or therapists. Online psychology programs can provide the foundational knowledge needed for these roles, but it's important to understand the specific requirements for licensure in different cities and states.

Whether you're looking to meet the licensed therapist requirements in San Diego or exploring how to become a licensed therapist in San Francisco, each region may have its own educational prerequisites, supervised experience hours, and examinations.

For example, if you're interested in the mental health field in San Jose, you’ll need to understand the San Jose licensed therapist education requirements. Similarly, meeting the Santa Ana licensed therapist requirements is crucial for anyone hoping to practice in that area.

By carefully researching your chosen location's pathways and integrating accredited online degrees with practical experience, you can set yourself up for a successful and rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Schretlen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles