World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
133
Citations
60343
World Ranking
2246
National Ranking
1268

Psychology

D-Index
133
Citations
59971
World Ranking
155
National Ranking
96

Neuroscience

D-Index
133
Citations
60318
World Ranking
260
National Ranking
160

John A. Sweeney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Sweeney sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 656 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John A. Sweeney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Sweeney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Sweeney was affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research focused primarily on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions across cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, and genetics.

The scientist's work concentrated on several main topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function

John A. Sweeney published extensively in well-regarded venues such as:

  • Biological Psychiatry (19 publications)
  • Schizophrenia Research (18 publications)
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (14 publications)
  • Human Brain Mapping (10 publications)
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (10 publications)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sweeney were:

  • Qiyong Gong
  • Matcheri S. Keshavan
  • Carol A. Tamminga
  • Godfrey D. Pearlson
  • Brett A. Clementz

Among their recent published papers were:

  • Cortical Thickness Abnormalities at Different Stages of the Illness Course in Schizophrenia (2022, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • Multivariate Relationships between Peripheral Inflammatory Marker Subtypes and Cognitive and Brain Structural Measures in Psychosis (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium (2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin)
  • The Neuro-Pathophysiology of Temporomandibular Disorders-Related Pain: A Systematic Review of Structural and Functional MRI Studies (2020, The Journal of Headache and Pain)
  • Brain Gray Matter Structures Associated with Trait Impulsivity: A Systematic Review and Voxel-Based Meta-Analysis (2021, Human Brain Mapping)

Best Publications

  • Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism

    F. Kyle Satterstrom;F. Kyle Satterstrom;Jack A. Kosmicki;Jiebiao Wang;Michael S. Breen

  • Maturation of Cognitive Processes From Late Childhood to Adulthood

    Beatriz Luna;Krista E. Garver;Trinity A. Urban;Nicole A. Lazar

  • Autism genome-wide copy number variation reveals ubiquitin and neuronal genes

    Joseph T. Glessner;Kai Wang;Guiqing Cai;Olena Korvatska

  • Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy

    Mark J. Millan;Yves Agid;Martin Brüne;Edward T. Bullmore

  • Common genetic variants on 5p14.1 associate with autism spectrum disorders

    Kai Wang;Haitao Zhang;Deqiong Ma;Maja Bucan

  • Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development.

    Beatriz Luna;Keith R. Thulborn;Douglas P. Munoz;Elisha P. Merriam

  • Consensus Paper: Pathological Role of the Cerebellum in Autism

    S. Hossein Fatemi;Kimberly A. Aldinger;Paul Ashwood;Margaret L. Bauman

  • Drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: clinical correlates and reasons for use.

    Lisa Dixon;Gretchen Haas;Peter J. Weiden;John Sweeney

  • Identification of Distinct Psychosis Biotypes Using Brain-Based Biomarkers

    Brett A. Clementz;John A. Sweeney;Jordan P. Hamm;Elena I. Ivleva

  • Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory

    J. A. Sweeney;M. A. Mintun;S. Kwee;M. B. Wiseman

  • The Emergence of Collaborative Brain Function: fMRI Studies of the Development of Response Inhibition

    Beatriz Luna;John A. Sweeney

  • Neuropsychologic impairments in bipolar and unipolar mood disorders on the CANTAB neurocognitive battery

    John A Sweeney;Julie A Kmiec;David J Kupfer

  • Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism

    F. Kyle Satterstrom;Jack A. Kosmicki;Jiebiao Wang;Michael S Breen;Michael S Breen

  • Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders.

    Jun Wang;Jamie Barstein;Lauren E Ethridge;Matthew W Mosconi

  • Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function.

    Fabio Babiloni;Febo Cincotti;Claudio Babiloni;Filippo Carducci

  • Genome-wide analyses of exonic copy number variants in a family-based study point to novel autism susceptibility genes

    Maja Bucan;Brett S. Abrahams;Kai Wang;Joseph T. Glessner

  • Neocortical system abnormalities in autism: An fMRI study of spatial working memory

    B. Luna;N. J. Minshew;K. E. Garver;N. A. Lazar

  • Suicidal behavior in patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.

    Elizabeth D. Radomsky;Gretchen L. Haas;J. John Mann;John A. Sweeney

  • Prefrontal cortical dysfunction in depression determined by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance.

    Elisha P. Merriam;Michael E. Thase;Gretchen L. Haas;Matcheri S. Keshavan

  • Maturation of Executive Function in Autism

    Beatriz Luna;Sara K. Doll;Stephen J. Hegedus;Nancy J. Minshew

  • Cognitive disturbance in outpatient depressed younger adults: evidence of modest impairment

    Merida M Grant;Michael E Thase;John A Sweeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Matcheri S. Keshavan
Matcheri S. Keshavan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Carol A. Tamminga
Carol A. Tamminga The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Qiyong Gong
Qiyong Gong Sichuan University
Elliot S. Gershon
Elliot S. Gershon University of Chicago
Su Lui
Su Lui Sichuan University
James L. Reilly
James L. Reilly Northwestern University
Xiaoqi Huang
Xiaoqi Huang Sichuan University
Beatriz Luna
Beatriz Luna University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology opens the door to a wide range of related online degree options and career pathways. Many students interested in human behavior also explore social work, a closely related field that combines psychological principles with practical support techniques. Social work degrees offer flexibility and are available through both traditional and online programs.

If you are looking for programs tailored to your region, there are several popular social work programs in North Carolina and most popular social work degree programs in Pittsburgh to consider. These schools provide comprehensive curricula that blend psychology and hands-on fieldwork, preparing graduates for in-demand roles.

For those seeking value and flexibility, online options are increasingly popular. The best value online BSW programs in Ohio are known for affordability and strong student outcomes, while the best value online social work degrees in USA offer nationwide comparisons to help you choose the right path.

Exploring these online degrees will equip you with specialized skills that are highly sought-after in mental health, counseling, and social services careers.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Sweeney

Recently Published Articles