World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Godfrey D. Pearlson

Godfrey D. Pearlson

Award Badge
Neuroscience
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
158
Citations
94942
World Ranking
852
National Ranking
485

Neuroscience

D-Index
158
Citations
94929
World Ranking
121
National Ranking
82

Godfrey D. Pearlson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godfrey D. Pearlson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 969 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Godfrey D. Pearlson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godfrey D. Pearlson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 158 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award

Overview

Godfrey D. Pearlson is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Neuroscience and Medicine. Within these broader areas, their work concentrates on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's publication record includes numerous papers in various well-known venues. Frequent publication outlets feature:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Human Brain Mapping

Among recent contributions, selected papers include:

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Multivariate relationships between peripheral inflammatory marker subtypes and cognitive and brain structural measures in psychosis, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium, 2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Dynamic state with covarying brain activity-connectivity: On the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Regression dynamic causal modeling for resting-state fMRI, 2021, Human Brain Mapping

The main topics addressed in Godfrey D. Pearlson's research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research efforts include Matcheri S. Keshavan, Carol A. Tamminga, Vince D. Calhoun, Brett A. Clementz, and Elliot S. Gershon.

Godfrey D. Pearlson has also contributed to academic publishing through books, notably with the publication titled The Science of Weed, released by Johns Hopkins University Press in 2024.

Best Publications

  • A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis

    V.D. Calhoun;T. Adali;G.D. Pearlson;J.J. Pekar;J.J. Pekar

  • Prodromal Assessment With the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms: Predictive Validity, Interrater Reliability, and Training to Reliability

    Tandy J. Miller;Thomas H. McGlashan;Joanna L. Rosen;Kristen Cadenhead

  • The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery

    Vince D. Calhoun;Vince D. Calhoun;Robyn Miller;Godfrey Pearlson;Tulay Adalı

  • A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks

    Elena A. Allen;Erik B. Erhardt;Eswar Damaraju;William Gruner;William Gruner

  • Aberrant "default mode" functional connectivity in schizophrenia.

    Abigail G. Garrity;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Kristen McKiernan;Dan Lloyd

  • Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium

    T. G M van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

  • Positron emission tomography reveals elevated D2 dopamine receptors in drug-naive schizophrenics

    Dean F. Wong;Henry N. Wagner;Larry E. Tune;Robert F. Dannals

  • DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking

    Hangyi Jiang;Hangyi Jiang;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Jinsuh Kim;Jinsuh Kim;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Godfrey D. Pearlson

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia

    E. Damaraju;E.A. Allen;E.A. Allen;A. Belger;J.M. Ford;J.M. Ford

  • Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium

    Unknown

  • A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia.

    Madiha J. Jafri;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Michael C. Stevens;Vince D. Calhoun

  • Auditory hallucinations and smaller superior temporal gyral volume in schizophrenia

    Patrick Ernest Barta;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Richard E. Powers;Stephanie S. Richards

  • Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms.

    V.D. Calhoun;T. Adali;G.D. Pearlson;J.J. Pekar;J.J. Pekar

  • Identification of Distinct Psychosis Biotypes Using Brain-Based Biomarkers

    Brett A. Clementz;John A. Sweeney;Jordan P. Hamm;Elena I. Ivleva

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • Abnormal functional connectivity of default mode sub-networks in autism spectrum disorder patients.

    Michal Assaf;Kanchana Jagannathan;Vince D. Calhoun;Laura Miller

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Nortriptyline treatment of post-stroke depression: a double-blind study

    John R. Lipsey;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Robert G. Robinson;Krishna Rao

  • MRI volumes of amygdala and hippocampus in non-mentally retarded autistic adolescents and adults.

    Elizabeth Aylward;Nancy J Minshew;G Goldstein;N A Honeycutt

  • Imaging cortical association tracts in the human brain using diffusion-tensor-based axonal tracking.

    Susumu Mori;Walter E. Kaufmann;Christos Davatzikos;Bram Stieltjes

  • Erratum: Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium (Molecular Psychiatry (2015) DOI:10.1038/mp.2015.63)

    T. G.M. Van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Matcheri S. Keshavan
Matcheri S. Keshavan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Carol A. Tamminga
Carol A. Tamminga The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
John A. Sweeney
John A. Sweeney University of Cincinnati
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Michael C. Stevens
Michael C. Stevens Yale University
Elliot S. Gershon
Elliot S. Gershon University of Chicago
Patrick E. Barta
Patrick E. Barta Johns Hopkins University
Kent A. Kiehl
Kent A. Kiehl University of New Mexico
Shashwath A. Meda
Shashwath A. Meda Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, several related online degree pathways can expand career opportunities in mental health, social services, and counseling. Accelerated online programs are an excellent option for those looking to enter the workforce quickly. For example, a fast track social work degree online can prepare graduates to make an impact in community and clinical settings, often in less time than traditional programs.

Psychology is also a popular alternative for neuroscience students, with accelerated psychology programs allowing for a quicker path to employment or further graduate studies. If you're interested in counseling, consider pursuing one of the best online cacrep counseling programs, which ensures rigorous standards and broader licensure options.

Cost is a key factor for many students. Exploring options like a masters in counseling online cost can help you find programs that fit your budget without sacrificing quality. Choosing the right online pathway can lead to meaningful careers at the intersection of neuroscience, psychology, and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Godfrey D. Pearlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles