World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
17313
World Ranking
4148
National Ranking
1567

Steven A. Ackerman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Steven A. Ackerman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven A. Ackerman is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas in environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, emphasizing atmospheric and climate-related phenomena.

The primary fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, key subfields of research addressed by Ackerman are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Environmental Chemistry

Major topics covered in their work are:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception

Steven A. Ackerman has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • "The Continuity MODIS-VIIRS Cloud Mask," 2020, Remote Sensing
  • "Application of a Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Sea Ice Leads," 2021, Remote Sensing
  • "A 20-Year Climatology of Sea Ice Leads Detected in Infrared Satellite Imagery Using a Convolutional Neural Network," 2022, Remote Sensing
  • "Lessons Learned from the Updated GEWEX Cloud Assessment Database," 2024, Surveys in Geophysics
  • "Evaluation of Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) neural network cloud detection against current operational cloud masks," 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Frequent publication venues for Ackerman's work include:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Remote Sensing
  • Surveys in Geophysics
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

Throughout their career, Ackerman has collaborated with various researchers. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Andrew K. Heidinger
  • Jay P. Hoffman
  • Yinghui Liu
  • Jeffrey R. Key
  • C.H. White

Best Publications

  • The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra

    S. Platnick;M.D. King;S.A. Ackerman;W.P. Menzel

  • Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS

    Steven A. Ackerman;Kathleen I. Strabala;W. Paul Menzel;Richard A. Frey

  • THE CALIPSO MISSION: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds

    D. M. Winker;Jacques Pelon;J. A. Coakley;S. A. Ackerman

  • Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS

    M.D. King;W.P. Menzel;Y.J. Kaufman;D. Tanre

  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Clouds Observed by MODIS Onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites

    M. D. King;S. Platnick;W. P. Menzel;S. A. Ackerman

  • Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel

    C. J. Stubenrauch;W. B. Rossow;S. Kinne;S. Ackerman

  • Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation

    S. A. Ackerman;R. E. Holz;R. Frey;E. W. Eloranta

  • Remote sensing aerosols using satellite infrared observations

    Steven A. Ackerman

  • Cloud Properties inferred from 812-µm Data

    Kathleen I. Strabala;Steven A. Ackerman;W. Paul Menzel

  • Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase

    Bryan A. Baum;Peter F. Soulen;Kathleen I. Strabala;Michael D. King

  • Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators

    Robert Pincus;Steven Platnick;Steven A. Ackerman;Richard S. Hemler

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP

    R. E. Holz;S. A. Ackerman;F. W. Nagle;R. Frey

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • The 27–28 October 1986 FIRE IFO Cirrus Case Study: Spectral Properties of Cirrus Clouds in the 8–12 μm Window

    Steven A. Ackerman;W. L. Smith;H. E. Revercomb;J. D. Spinhirne

  • Remote Sensing of Liquid Water and Ice Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Radius in the Arctic: Application of Airborne Multispectral MAS Data

    Michael D. King;Steven Platnick;Ping Yang;G. Thomas Arnold

  • A Shortwave Parameterization Revised to Improve Cloud Absorption

    Graeme L. Stephens;Steven Ackerman;Eric A. Smith

  • Single scattering properties of droxtals

    Ping Yang;Bryan A Baum;Andrew J Heymsfield;Yong X Hu

  • Using the radiative temperature difference at 3.7 and 11 μm to tract dust outbreaks

    Steven A. Ackerman

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Platnick
Steven Platnick Goddard Space Flight Center
W. Paul Menzel
W. Paul Menzel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert E. Holz
Robert E. Holz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael D. King
Michael D. King University of Colorado Boulder
William L. Smith
William L. Smith Langley Research Center
Andrew K. Heidinger
Andrew K. Heidinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bryan A. Baum
Bryan A. Baum University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy J. Schmit
Timothy J. Schmit National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ping Yang
Ping Yang Texas A&M University
Marco Tedesco
Marco Tedesco Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to numerous related fields that complement this discipline. For students seeking a less intensive entry, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into streamlined degree options while maintaining relevance to environmental topics.

For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing one of the best online geology degree programs can deepen knowledge about soil, minerals, and rock formations, essential for environmental assessments.

Geospatial technology plays a vital role in monitoring and managing natural resources, making best GIS graduate programs an excellent choice for advancing careers through skills in mapping and data analysis.

Finally, the integration of environmental policy and public administration is crucial for creating sustainable solutions. Enrolling in online MPA degrees can equip professionals with leadership abilities to influence environmental governance and community initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Steven A. Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles