World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 110 5488 5155 2957 2742 409 51895

Jonathan Himmelfarb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Himmelfarb between 1973 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Himmelfarb published across 54 years, from 1973 to 2026, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2021. 36 of the 509 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2021. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 8 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 1 publication
1973 2026

509 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Himmelfarb: publications per year, 1973 to 2026
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 8
1998 6
1999 7
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 6
2004 13
2005 13
2006 11
2007 20
2008 9
2009 22
2010 13
2011 14
2012 6
2013 13
2014 18
2015 20
2016 32
2017 22
2018 21
2019 14
2020 30
2021 43
2022 22
2023 32
2024 30
2025 35
2026 1
Total 509
Download as CSV

Jonathan Himmelfarb publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Himmelfarb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 409 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 409
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Himmelfarb D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Himmelfarb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 110
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Jonathan Himmelfarb is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Nephrology, contributing significantly to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The research topics covered include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Acute Kidney Injury Research, Renal and related cancers, Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies, 3D Printing in Biomedical Research, and Diet and metabolism studies.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Himmelfarb include:

  • The current and future landscape of dialysis, 2020, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence
  • Rationale and design of the Kidney Precision Medicine Project, 2021, Kidney International
  • Biomarkers of inflammation and repair in kidney disease progression, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • A reference tissue atlas for the human kidney, 2022, Science Advances

Their frequent co-authors include Chirag R. Parikh, T. Alp İkizler, Paul L. Kimmel, Pavan K. Bhatraju, and Steven G. Coca.

Jonathan Himmelfarb has published extensively in several journals, notably:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Kidney International
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Kidney360

Their work is situated at the intersection of clinical and molecular research approaches aimed at understanding kidney disease progression and dialysis treatment strategies.

Jonathan Himmelfarb was awarded the title Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.

    Scott M. Lundberg;Scott M. Lundberg;Gabriel Erion;Hugh Chen;Alex DeGrave

  • The elephant in uremia: Oxidant stress as a unifying concept of cardiovascular disease in uremia

    Jonathan Himmelfarb;Jonathan Himmelfarb;Peter Stenvinkel;Peter Stenvinkel;T. Alp Ikizler;T. Alp Ikizler;Raymond M. Hakim;Raymond M. Hakim

  • Acute Kidney Injury Increases Risk of ESRD among Elderly

    Areef Ishani;Jay L. Xue;Jonathan Himmelfarb;Paul W. Eggers

  • Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: the PICARD experience.

    Ravindra L. Mehta;Maria T. Pascual;Sharon Soroko;Brandon R. Savage

  • Kidney Disease and Increased Mortality Risk in Type 2 Diabetes

    Maryam Afkarian;Michael C. Sachs;Bryan Kestenbaum;Irl B. Hirsch

  • Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

    Josée Bouchard;Sharon B. Soroko;Glenn M. Chertow;Jonathan Himmelfarb

  • Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States

    Ian H. de Boer;Tessa C. Rue;Yoshio N. Hall;Patrick J. Heagerty

  • Increased prevalence of oxidant stress and inflammation in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.

    B Payson Oberg;Elizabeth McMenamin;Elizabeth McMenamin;F Lee Lucas;F Lee Lucas;Ellen McMonagle;Ellen McMonagle

  • Incidence and Mortality of Acute Renal Failure in Medicare Beneficiaries, 1992 to 2001

    Jay L. Xue;Frank Daniels;Robert A. Star;Paul L. Kimmel

  • Effect of Clopidogrel on Early Failure of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Laura M. Dember;Gerald J. Beck;Michael Allon;James A. Delmez

  • Prevention and treatment of protein energy wasting in chronic kidney disease patients: a consensus statement by the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism

    T. Alp Ikizler;Noel J. Cano;Harold Franch;Denis Fouque

  • Plasma cytokine levels predict mortality in patients with acute renal failure.

    Edith M. Simmons;Jonathan Himmelfarb;M. Tugrul Sezer;Glenn M. Chertow

  • Acute Kidney Injury Episodes and Chronic Kidney Disease Risk in Diabetes Mellitus

    Charuhas V. Thakar;Annette Christianson;Jonathan Himmelfarb;Anthony C. Leonard

  • Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients

    Etienne Macedo;Josée Bouchard;Sharon H Soroko;Glenn M Chertow

  • Association between Physical Performance and All-Cause Mortality in CKD

    Baback Roshanravan;Cassianne Robinson-Cohen;Kushang V. Patel;Ernest Ayers

  • Timing of Initiation of Dialysis in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

    Kathleen D. Liu;Jonathan Himmelfarb;Emil Paganini;T. Alp Ikizler

  • The current and future landscape of dialysis.

    Jonathan Himmelfarb;Raymond Vanholder;Rajnish Mehrotra;Marcello Tonelli

  • High-Throughput Screening Enhances Kidney Organoid Differentiation From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and Enables Automated Multidimensional Phenotyping

    Stefan M. Czerniecki;Nelly M. Cruz;Jennifer L. Harder;Rajasree Menon

  • Anti–microRNA-21 oligonucleotides prevent Alport nephropathy progression by stimulating metabolic pathways

    Ivan G. Gomez;Deidre A. MacKenna;Bryce G. Johnson;Vivek Kaimal

  • Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension

    Maarten Taal;Jonathan Himmelfarb;Roy Bloom

Frequent Co-Authors

T. Alp Ikizler
T. Alp Ikizler Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Ian H. de Boer
Ian H. de Boer University of Washington
Bryan Kestenbaum
Bryan Kestenbaum University of Washington
Glenn M. Chertow
Glenn M. Chertow Stanford University
Raymond M. Hakim
Raymond M. Hakim Vanderbilt University
Rajnish Mehrotra
Rajnish Mehrotra University of Washington
Alfred K. Cheung
Alfred K. Cheung University of Utah
Ronit Katz
Ronit Katz University of Washington
John W. Kusek
John W. Kusek National Institutes of Health
Harold I. Feldman
Harold I. Feldman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in a career in medicine, there are many related online degrees and accelerated career pathways to consider. For instance, prospective nurses might want to explore nursing school that does not require teas test options, which can make the admissions process more accessible and help you start your career sooner.

Those drawn to leadership roles in healthcare may benefit from a health care administration degree online. These programs are designed for flexibility and can prepare you for management positions without requiring you to pause your current career.

Current registered nurses (RNs) seeking to move into advanced practice roles, such as nurse practitioner, can enroll in adn to np programs online. These bridge programs offer a direct, streamlined route to higher qualifications and expanded career options.

Additionally, if you're passionate about wellness and nutrition, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can open doors to roles in healthcare, fitness, and public health.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Himmelfarb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles