World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rinaldo Bellomo

Rinaldo Bellomo

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
190
Citations
204838
World Ranking
415
National Ranking
6

Medicine

D-Index
201
Citations
219365
World Ranking
174
National Ranking
1

Rinaldo Bellomo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinaldo Bellomo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,887 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rinaldo Bellomo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinaldo Bellomo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 201 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Rinaldo Bellomo is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has a substantial body of research primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions in nephrology, critical care and intensive care medicine, surgery, emergency medicine, and epidemiology.

Their research centers on the study of acute kidney injury, sepsis diagnosis and treatment, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, hemodynamic monitoring and therapy, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, as well as trauma, hemostasis, coagulopathy, and resuscitation.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Critical Care and Resuscitation
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Blood Purification
  • Critical Care
  • Journal of Critical Care

Their most recent papers illustrate the focus on critical care and nephrology topics:

  • "Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup," 2023, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • "Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference," 2020, Kidney International
  • "Effect of Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine vs Hydrocortisone Alone on Time Alive and Free of Vasopressor Support Among Patients With Septic Shock," 2020, JAMA
  • "Early Active Mobilization during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU," 2022, New England Journal of Medicine

Rinaldo Bellomo has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, notably:

  • Glenn M. Eastwood (95 joint publications)
  • Michael Bailey (68 joint publications)
  • Andrew Udy (53 joint publications)
  • Paul J. Young (52 joint publications)
  • Ary Serpa Neto (44 joint publications)

The scope of their academic work encompasses 1,242 publications in medicine, with 223 focusing on nephrology and 162 addressing critical care and intensive care medicine. Other notable subfields include surgery, emergency medicine, and epidemiology.

Best Publications

  • The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

    Mervyn Singer;Clifford S. Deutschman;Christopher Warren Seymour;Manu Shankar-Hari

  • Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.

    Rinaldo Bellomo;Claudio Ronco;John A Kellum;Ravindra L Mehta

  • Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

    Nice-Sugar Study Investigators;D. Chittock;S. Su;D. Blair

  • Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Multinational, Multicenter Study

    Shigehiko Uchino;John A Kellum;Rinaldo Bellomo;Gordon S Doig

  • A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit

    Rinaldo Bellomo;Julie French;John Myburgh

  • Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study

    Eric A.J. Hoste;Eric A.J. Hoste;Eric A.J. Hoste;Sean M. Bagshaw;Rinaldo Bellomo;Cynthia M. Cely

  • Acute kidney injury

    Rinaldo Bellomo;John A Kellum;Claudio Ronco

  • Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial.

    Claudio Ronco;Rinaldo Bellomo;Peter Homel;Alessandra Brendolan

  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Andrew Davies;Daryl Jones;Michael Bailey;John Beca

  • Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care

    John A. Myburgh;Simon Finfer;Rinaldo Bellomo;Laurent Billot

  • Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock

    Sandra Lois Peake;Anthony Delaney;Michael John Bailey;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • State-of-the-Art PaperCardiorenal Syndrome

    Claudio Ronco;Mikko Haapio;Andrew A. House;Nagesh Anavekar

  • Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;Satoshi Suzuki;David V Pilcher

  • Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients.

    Rinaldo Bellomo;Alan Cass;Louise Cole

  • Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

    Ken Hillman;Jack Chen;Michelle Cretikos;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in Defining Severe Sepsis

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;David V Pilcher;David James Cooper

  • Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in australia and new zealand.

    Steven A R Webb;Ville Yrjo Olavi Pettila;Ian M Seppelt;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Accuracy of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) in Diagnosis and Prognosis in Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Michael Haase;Rinaldo Bellomo;Prasad V Devarajan;Peter Schlattmann

  • Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group

    Mitra K Nadim;John A. Kellum;Andrew Davenport;Florence Wong

  • Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Patients with Early Septic Shock The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group*

    Sandra L. Peake;Michael Bailey;Rinaldo Bellomo;D. James Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Ronco
Claudio Ronco University of Padua
Michael Bailey
Michael Bailey Monash University
Sean M. Bagshaw
Sean M. Bagshaw University of Alberta
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Simon Finfer
Simon Finfer George Institute for Global Health
Ian T. Baldwin
Ian T. Baldwin Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Giovanni Landoni
Giovanni Landoni Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Theodore J. Iwashyna
Theodore J. Iwashyna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Beasley
Richard Beasley Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
Ken Hillman
Ken Hillman University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine can take many forms, with online programs offering flexible paths to a variety of in-demand roles. Nursing remains one of the fastest growing fields, and there are several online degrees designed for both new students and working professionals seeking advancement.

Those interested in becoming advanced healthcare providers might consider exploring the most affordable nurse practitioner programs available online. For an entry-level start, there are reputable online nursing programs that can help students gain foundational skills and prepare for licensure exams.

Current registered nurses (RNs) looking to expand their qualifications may benefit from most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs, which are specifically designed to build on existing experience and support career growth. For those seeking leadership, academic, or research-focused roles, consider advancing further through online phd programs in nursing.

Online degrees in healthcare can provide cost-effective and flexible opportunities, making it easier to achieve your professional goals in medicine from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Rinaldo Bellomo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles