World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 113 4925 4623 2668 2474 444 50029

Prasad Devarajan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Prasad Devarajan between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Prasad Devarajan published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 19.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 342 publications in 2012. 17 of the 776 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 342. Peak 342 publications in 2012. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 342 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications
1987 2025

776 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Prasad Devarajan: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 5
2003 7
2004 7
2005 12
2006 15
2007 18
2008 37
2009 22
2010 18
2011 34
2012 342
2013 16
2014 16
2015 17
2016 20
2017 27
2018 12
2019 17
2020 18
2021 23
2022 21
2023 19
2024 6
2025 11
Total 776
Download as CSV

Prasad Devarajan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prasad Devarajan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 444 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 444
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Prasad Devarajan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prasad Devarajan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 113
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Prasad Devarajan is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Nephrology as well as related subfields including Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Rheumatology.

The scientist's main areas of work are centered on kidney-related conditions and systemic diseases. Key topics include Acute Kidney Injury Research, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies, Renal and related Cancers, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research, Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.

Devarajan has contributed extensively to academic literature, with recent papers including:

  • Chronic Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression: Role of Nrf2 (2021) published in Kidney International Reports
  • Single-Cell Profiling of AKI in a Murine Model Reveals Novel Transcriptional Signatures, Profibrotic Phenotype, and Epithelial-to-Stromal Crosstalk (2020) published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Cystatin C as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease: latest developments (2020) published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Post-Acute Kidney Injury Proteinuria and Subsequent Kidney Disease Progression (2020) published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • A prospective cohort study of acute kidney injury and kidney outcomes, cardiovascular events, and death (2020) published in Kidney International

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of Devarajan's career. Frequent co-authors include Michael Zappitelli, Qing Ma, Stuart L. Goldstein, Jason H. Greenberg, and Hermine I. Brunner.

Publication venues where Devarajan's work has appeared multiple times include the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Pediatric Nephrology, Kidney International Reports, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, and American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology.

Recognition of professional contributions includes membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery

    Jaya Mishra;Catherine Dent;Ridwan Tarabishi;Mark M Mitsnefes

  • Identification of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Novel Early Urinary Biomarker for Ischemic Renal Injury

    Jaya Mishra;Qing Ma;Anne Prada;Mark Mitsnefes

  • Accuracy of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) in Diagnosis and Prognosis in Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Michael Haase;Rinaldo Bellomo;Prasad V Devarajan;Peter Schlattmann

  • Update on mechanisms of ischemic acute kidney injury.

    Prasad Devarajan

  • Endocytic delivery of lipocalin-siderophore-iron complex rescues the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury

    Kiyoshi Mori;H. Thomas Lee;Dana Rapoport;Ian R. Drexler

  • Urine NGAL Predicts Severity of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study

    Michael Bennett;Catherine L. Dent;Qing Ma;Sudha Dastrala

  • Dual Action of Neutrophil Gelatinase–Associated Lipocalin

    Kai M. Schmidt-Ott;Kiyoshi Mori;Jau Yi Li;Avtandil Kalandadze

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of a Single Emergency Department Measurement of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase–Associated Lipocalin for Diagnosing Acute Kidney Injury

    Thomas L Nickolas;Matthew J O'Rourke;Jun Yang;Meghan E Sise

  • The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: a multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies.

    Michael Haase;Prasad Devarajan;Anja Haase-Fielitz;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Urinary IL-18 is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

    C.R. Parikh;J. Mishra;H. Thiessen-Philbrook;B. Dursun

  • Urinary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury

    W.K. Han;S.S. Waikar;A. Johnson;R.A. Betensky

  • Amelioration of Ischemic Acute Renal Injury by Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin

    Jaya Mishra;Kiyoshi Mori;Qing Ma;Caitlin Kelly

  • Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin: A Novel Early Urinary Biomarker for Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity

    Jaya Mishra;Kiyoshi Mori;Qing Ma;Caitlin Kelly

  • Differential gene expression following early renal ischemia/reperfusion

    Suroj Supavekin;Weijia Zhang;Raju Kucherlapati;Frederick J. Kaskel

  • Urine NGAL and IL-18 are predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function following kidney transplantation.

    C. R. Parikh;A. Jani;J. Mishra;Q. Ma

  • NGAL is an early predictive biomarker of contrast-induced nephropathy in children.

    Russel Hirsch;Catherine Dent;Holly Pfriem;Janene Allen

  • Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin predicts acute kidney injury, morbidity and mortality after pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective uncontrolled cohort study.

    Catherine L Dent;Qing Ma;Sudha Dastrala;Michael Bennett

  • Novel and conventional serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury in adult cardiac surgery—A prospective cohort study*

    Ania Haase-Fielitz;Rinaldo Bellomo;Prasad V Devarajan;David A Story

  • Postoperative Biomarkers Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Poor Outcomes after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

    Chirag R. Parikh;Prasad Devarajan;Michael Zappitelli;Kyaw Sint;Kyaw Sint

  • Urinary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury. Commentary

    C. R. Parikh;A. X. Garg;W. K. Han;S. S. Waikar

Frequent Co-Authors

Chirag R. Parikh
Chirag R. Parikh Johns Hopkins University
Michael J. Bennett
Michael J. Bennett University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Steven G. Coca
Steven G. Coca Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Michael G. Shlipak
Michael G. Shlipak University of California, San Francisco
Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Stuart L. Goldstein
Stuart L. Goldstein Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jonathan Barasch
Jonathan Barasch Columbia University
Amit X. Garg
Amit X. Garg University of Western Ontario
Charles L. Edelstein
Charles L. Edelstein University of Colorado Denver
Kiyoshi Mori
Kiyoshi Mori University of Shizuoka

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional medical school, there are several online pathways for advancing your healthcare education and career. Many nurses are seeking flexible, accelerated programs such as rn to bsn online no clinicals, which allow licensed RNs to earn a bachelor's degree without the need for in-person clinicals. This is ideal for working professionals balancing their studies with job responsibilities.

Those aiming for leadership or specialist roles often consider the fastest dnp program. These programs can be completed in a shorter time frame, helping students quickly move into advanced practice or administrative positions.

Flexibility also extends to advanced degrees. Certain online dnp programs without clinicals reduce clinical requirements and focus on leadership, policy, or informatics, making them accessible to more students nationwide.

For those interested in entering the medical field fast, fast track medical programs offer streamlined coursework for becoming a licensed practical nurse (LPN) or similar roles. These options make healthcare careers more accessible and adaptable for a variety of learners.

Best Scientists Citing Prasad Devarajan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles