World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew D. Shaw

Andrew D. Shaw

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
27999
World Ranking
14107
National Ranking
585

Andrew D. Shaw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Shaw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 332 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew D. Shaw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Shaw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew D. Shaw is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has an extensive background in medical research with a focus on acute kidney injury, cardiology, surgery, and critical care. Their work has spanned multiple disciplines within medicine, contributing to a broad range of research topics.

Their main fields of study include Medicine, with 200 publications, and several subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (49 publications), Surgery (43), Nephrology (33), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19), and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (14). The primary research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Andrew D. Shaw has contributed to several notable papers, including:

  • Recommendations on Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers From the Acute Disease Quality Initiative Consensus Conference, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Harmonizing acute and chronic kidney disease definition and classification: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference, 2021, Kidney International
  • Intraoperative Hypotension Is Associated With Adverse Clinical Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery, 2020, Anesthesia & Analgesia
  • Postoperative acute kidney injury in adult non-cardiac surgery: joint consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative and PeriOperative Quality Initiative, 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Daniel T. Engelman
  • Marlies Ostermann
  • Michael P. W. Grocott
  • Timothy E. Miller
  • Alexander Zarbock

Their research has been published in multiple journals, with frequent publication venues being:

  • Perioperative Medicine (8 publications)
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (7 publications)
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (6 publications)
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (6 publications)
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (5 publications)

In addition to journal articles, Shaw has contributed to book publications, including titles released by UWA Publishing and Bloomsbury Professional eBooks. These include Pathways to Water Sector Decarbonization, Carbon Capture and Utilization (2023) with 21 citations and Corporate Administrations and Rescue Procedures (2022).

Best Publications

  • Cardio-renal syndromes: report from the consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative.

    Claudio Ronco;Peter R. McCullough;Stefan D. Anker;Inder Anand

  • Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury.

    Kianoush B Kashani;Ali Al-Khafaji;Thomas Ardiles;Antonio Artigas

  • Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults

    Matthew W. Semler;Wesley H. Self;Jonathan P. Wanderer;Jesse M. Ehrenfeld

  • Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte.

    Andrew D. Shaw;Sean M. Bagshaw;Stuart L. Goldstein;Lynette A. Scherer

  • Recommendations on Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers From the Acute Disease Quality Initiative Consensus Conference: A Consensus Statement.

    Marlies Ostermann;Alexander Zarbock;Stuart Goldstein;Kianoush Kashani

  • Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: current understanding and future directions.

    Jason B. O’Neal;Andrew D. Shaw;Frederic T. Billings

  • Controversies in acute kidney injury : conclusions from a Kidney Disease : Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference

    Marlies Ostermann;Rinaldo Bellomo;Emmanuel A. Burdmann;Kent Doi

  • Regional brain blood flow in man during acute changes in arterial blood gases

    C. K. Willie;D. B. Macleod;A. D. Shaw;A. D. Shaw;K. J. Smith

  • Classifying AKI by Urine Output versus Serum Creatinine Level

    John A. Kellum;Florentina E. Sileanu;Raghavan Murugan;Nicole Lucko

  • Validation of Cell-Cycle Arrest Biomarkers for Acute Kidney Injury Using Clinical Adjudication

    Azra Bihorac;Lakhmir S. Chawla;Andrew D. Shaw;Ali Al-Khafaji

  • Association Between the Choice of IV Crystalloid and In-Hospital Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis

    Karthik Raghunathan;Andrew Shaw;Brian Nathanson;Til Stürmer

  • Potential use of biomarkers in acute kidney injury: report and summary of recommendations from the 10th Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative consensus conference

    Patrick T. Murray;Ravindra L. Mehta;Andrew D. Shaw;Claudio Ronco

  • Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model

    Eric Hoste;Eric Hoste;Kathryn Maitland;Kathryn Maitland;Charles Scott Brudney;Ravindra Mehta

  • American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Nutrition Screening and Therapy Within a Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathway.

    Paul E Wischmeyer;Franco Carli;David C Evans;Sarah Guilbert

  • Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation.

    M. L. Krajewski;K. Raghunathan;K. Raghunathan;S. M. Paluszkiewicz;C. R. Schermer

  • Improved Postoperative Outcomes Associated with Preoperative Statin Therapy

    Katja Hindler;Andrew D. Shaw;Joshua Samuels;Stephanie Fulton

  • Development and standardization of a furosemide stress test to predict the severity of acute kidney injury.

    Lakhmir S Chawla;Danielle L Davison;Ermira Brasha-Mitchell;Jay L Koyner

  • The pathophysiology of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI)

    Rinaldo Bellomo;Stefano Auriemma;Alessandro Z Fabbri;Augusto D'Onofrio

  • Epidemiology of cardio-renal syndromes: workgroup statements from the 7th ADQI Consensus Conference

    Sean M. Bagshaw;Dinna N. Cruz;Nadia Aspromonte;Luciano Daliento

  • Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on preoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery

    Robert D. Sanders;Fintan Hughes;Andrew Shaw;Annemarie Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Claudio Ronco
Claudio Ronco University of Padua
Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Peter A. McCullough
Peter A. McCullough Baylor University Medical Center
Michael P. W. Grocott
Michael P. W. Grocott University of Southampton
Sean M. Bagshaw
Sean M. Bagshaw University of Alberta
Ravindra L. Mehta
Ravindra L. Mehta University of California, San Diego
Tong J. Gan
Tong J. Gan Stony Brook University
Eric Hoste
Eric Hoste Ghent University Hospital
Stuart L. Goldstein
Stuart L. Goldstein Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t always limited to becoming a physician. There are several online degree options that open doors to growing healthcare roles. For example, nurses looking to specialize in mental health can benefit from the shortest online pmhnp programs, which make it possible to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) in less time.

Healthcare administration is another high-demand field. Many professionals choose to advance with the best online mha programs, designed for flexibility and leadership development. If cost is a concern, there are also cheapest mha programs online that deliver quality education without the high price tag.

Finally, for those aiming for the highest levels in nursing, a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a respected credential. Explore the cheapest online dnp programs to balance affordability with advanced professional goals.

Whether your interests are in patient care, administration, or advanced nursing practice, these online degrees provide flexible pathways to shape your healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. Shaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles