World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
11168
World Ranking
3739
National Ranking
400

Mark L. Howe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Howe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 279 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark L. Howe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Howe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark L. Howe is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focused on neuroscience and psychology, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The main areas of study include memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, and memory and neural mechanisms.

The scientist's research topics cover:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Howe has contributed to significant publication venues in their field. These include:

  • Memory
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Forensic Science International Mind and Law
  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Frequent collaboration partners in Howe's research include Henry Otgaar, Olivier Dodier, Lawrence Patihis, Ivan Mangiulli, and Steven Jay Lynn.

Regarding their recent papers, Howe has been involved in studies addressing false and repressed memories, suggestibility, compliance, and the dynamics of false confessions. Some notable recent publications are:

  • What science tells us about false and repressed memories (2021) - published in Memory
  • Belief in Unconscious Repressed Memory Persists (2021) - published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Belief in unconscious repressed memory is widespread: A comment on Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019) (2020) - published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • The link between suggestibility, compliance, and false confessions: A review using experimental and field studies (2021) - published in Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • The impact of false denials on forgetting and false memory (2020) - published in Cognition

Their work largely engages with core psychological and neuroscientific mechanisms underlying memory distortions and forensic psychological processes. Howe's research integrates experimental approaches and analysis relevant to the fields of social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and artificial intelligence, all supporting the understanding of memory and cognitive functions.

Best Publications

  • On resolving the enigma of infantile amnesia.

    Mark L. Howe;Mary L. Courage

  • The emergence and early development of autobiographical memory.

    Mark L. Howe;Mary L. Courage

  • The Development of Forgetting and Reminiscence

    C J Brainerd;V F Reyna;M L Howe;J Kingma

  • Emerging themes in cognitive development

    Mark L. Howe;Robert Pasnak

  • An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions

    Mark L. Howe;Marina C. Wimmer;Nadine Gagnon;Shannon Plumpton

  • Cognitive Development in Adulthood

    Mark L. Howe;Charles J. Brainerd

  • How Can I Remember When "I" Wasn′t There: Long-Term Retention of Traumatic Experiences and Emergence of the Cognitive Self

    Mark L. Howe;Mary L. Courage;Carole Peterson

  • Cognitive development in adulthood : progress in cognitive development research

    Mark L. Howe;Charles J. Brainerd

  • Semantic processing in "associative" false memory.

    C. J. Brainerd;Y. Yang;V. F. Reyna;M. L. Howe

  • The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma:

    Henry Otgaar;Henry Otgaar;Henry Otgaar;Mark L. Howe;Mark L. Howe;Lawrence Patihis;Harald Merckelbach

  • Valence and the development of immediate and long-term false memory illusions

    Mark L. Howe;Ingrid Candel;Henry Otgaar;Catherine Malone

  • True and False Memories in Maltreated Children

    Mark L. Howe;Dante Cicchetti;Sheree L. Toth;Beth M. Cerrito

  • Development of Long-Term Retention

    Mark L. Howe;Charles J. Brainerd;Valerie F. Reyna

  • When Autobiographical Memory Begins.

    Mark L. Howe;Mary L. Courage;Shannon C. Edison

  • The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: Lessons from the past and their modern consequences

    Mark L. Howe;Lauren M. Knott

  • Misleading Children's Story Recall: Forgetting and Reminiscence of the Facts.

    Mark L. Howe

  • The Fate of Early Memories: Developmental Science and the Retention of Childhood Experiences

    Mark L. Howe

  • On the Susceptibility of Adaptive Memory to False Memory Illusions.

    Mark L. Howe;Mary H. Derbish

  • From infant to child: the dynamics of cognitive change in the second year of life.

    Mary L. Courage;Mark L. Howe

  • Development of children's long-term retention

    Mark L Howe;Charles J Brainerd

  • Eyewitness Identification : Theory, evidence, and procedural implications

    Mark L. Howe;Lauren M. Knott;Martin A. Conway

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles J. Brainerd
Charles J. Brainerd Cornell University
Mary L. Courage
Mary L. Courage St. John's University
Martin A. Conway
Martin A. Conway City, University of London
Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Tom Smeets
Tom Smeets Tilburg University
Valerie F. Reyna
Valerie F. Reyna Cornell University
Peter Muris
Peter Muris Maastricht University
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and diverse career pathways. Many students consider applying their psychology background to fields like social work, where educational and licensure requirements vary by state.

If you plan to become a social worker, it is essential to research state-specific requirements. For instance, you can learn more about the degree needed to be a social worker in Ohio, where a bachelor's in social work is the minimum requirement for most entry-level positions.

Similarly, reviewing the social worker degree requirements in Oklahoma will reveal that advanced roles may require a master’s degree or higher.

Prospective students should also pay attention to the social worker education requirements in Oregon, especially if they intend to pursue licensure or specialized roles within the field.

Lastly, you can explore the Pennsylvania education requirements for social workers to better understand the expectations in another major state.

Whether you are studying psychology or a related field, understanding these pathways will help you plan your education and professional goals effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Mark L. Howe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles