World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7209 6722 716 682 181 8634

Linden J. Ball publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linden J. Ball between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linden J. Ball published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 13 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1978 2025

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linden J. Ball: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 4
1999 2
2000 7
2001 4
2002 5
2003 4
2004 8
2005 9
2006 6
2007 16
2008 5
2009 6
2010 13
2011 12
2012 5
2013 11
2014 6
2015 7
2016 6
2017 14
2018 8
2019 4
2020 4
2021 7
2022 7
2023 25
2024 8
2025 5
Total 234
Download as CSV

Linden J. Ball publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linden J. Ball sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 181
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linden J. Ball D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linden J. Ball sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linden J. Ball is affiliated with the University of Central Lancashire in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional areas of study include social psychology and the intersection of sociology and political science.

Ball's recent research outputs include several papers published between 2020 and 2023. Notable publications are:

  • A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct, 2022, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • The impact of advertising creativity, warning-based appeals and green dispositions on the attentional effectiveness of environmental advertisements, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • The design entrepreneur: How adaptive cognition and formal design training create entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention, 2023, Design Studies
  • Sticky notes as a kind of design material: How sticky notes support design cognition and design collaboration, 2021, Design Studies
  • What makes creative advertisements memorable? The role of insight, 2020, Psychological Research

The most frequent co-authors in Ball's work include John E. Marsh, Beth H. Richardson, Emma Threadgold, Bo T. Christensen, and Wangbing Shen, indicating collaborative research efforts across various projects and topics.

Ball's research has appeared prominently in several publication venues, most notably:

  • Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • Journal of Intelligence
  • Design Studies
  • Psychological Research
  • Auditory Perception & Cognition

The scientist's main research interests reflect a multidisciplinary approach, involving these topics:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Design Education and Practice

Best Publications

  • Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices

    Linden J Ball;Thomas C Ormerod;Nicola J Morley

  • An Eye Movement Analysis of Web Page Usability

    Laura Cowen;Linden J.s Ball;Judy Delin

  • The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking

    Valerie A. Thompson;Jamie A. Prowse Turner;Gordon Pennycook;Linden J. Ball

  • Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution

    Linden J. Ball;Bo Thomas Christensen

  • Putting ethnography to work: the case for a cognitive ethnography of design

    Linden J. Ball;Thomas C. Ormerod

  • Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design

    Stefan Wiltschnig;Bo T. Christensen;Linden J. Ball

  • Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study

    L. J. Ball;J. St. B. T. Evans;I. Dennis

  • Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion

    Linden J. Ball;Thomas C. Ormerod

  • Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models.

    Linden J. Ball;Peter Phillips;Caroline N. Wade;Jeremy D. Quayle

  • Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection

    Damien Litchfield;Linden J. Ball;Tim Donovan;David J. Manning

  • Structure in idea sketching behaviour

    Manolya Kavakli;Stephen A.R Scrivener;Linden J Ball

  • Applying ethnography in the analysis and support of expertise in engineering design

    Linden J Ball;Thomas C Ormerod

  • Belief-logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model

    Edward J. N. Stupple;Linden J. Ball

  • Disfluent Fonts Don't Help People Solve Math Problems

    Andrew Meyer;Shane Frederick;Terence C. Burnham;Juan D. Guevara Pinto

  • Working memory, metacognitive uncertainty, and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.

    Jeremy D. Quayle;Linden J. Ball

  • In Search of Salience: A Response-time and Eye-movement Analysis of Bookmark Recognition

    Alex Poole;Linden J Ball;Peter Phillips

  • Inspection times and the selection task: What do eye-movements reveal about relevance effects?

    Linden J. Ball;Erica J. Lucas;Jeremy N. V. Miles;Alastair G. Gale

  • Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design

    Linden J. Ball;Balder Onarheim;Bo Thomas Christensen

  • When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model

    Edward J. N. Stupple;Linden J. Ball;Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Emily Kamal-Smith

  • Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects

    Linden J. Ball;Bo T. Christensen

  • Cueing retrospective verbal reports in usability testing through eye-movement replay

    Nicola Eger;Linden J. Ball;Robert Stevens;Jon Dodd

  • How the detection of insurance fraud succeeds and fails

    Nicola J. Morley;Linden J. Ball;Thomas C. Ormerod

  • Uncertainty and sketching behaviour

    Stephen A. R. Scrivener;Linden J. Ball;Winger S-W Tseng

  • Detecting insider threats through language change.

    Paul J. Taylor;Coral J. Dando;Thomas C. Ormerod;Linden J. Ball

Frequent Co-Authors

Valerie A. Thompson
Valerie A. Thompson University of Saskatchewan
Corina Sas
Corina Sas Lancaster University
Alan Dix
Alan Dix Swansea University
Mark L. Howe
Mark L. Howe City, University of London
Gordon Pennycook
Gordon Pennycook Cornell University
Trevor J. Crawford
Trevor J. Crawford Lancaster University
Kim Halskov
Kim Halskov Aarhus University
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans Plymouth University
Charlie Lewis
Charlie Lewis Lancaster University
Jeremy N. V. Miles
Jeremy N. V. Miles Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of meaningful careers, particularly in school counseling and mental health services. Online programs make it easier than ever to earn the necessary credentials, even if you plan to work in specific states.

If you’re interested in becoming a school counselor, each state has unique requirements. For instance, you can review the Missouri school counselor education requirements to understand the qualifications for that state. Want to work in Montana? Check out this guide on how to become a school counselor in Montana for state-specific information.

Certification processes can also differ greatly. Familiarize yourself with the Nebraska school counselor certification requirements or learn about the steps for becoming a school counselor in Nevada.

Understanding the certification journey in each state helps future counselors choose the right online degree and plan their career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Linden J. Ball

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles