World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
7950
World Ranking
5510
National Ranking
1887

Evan H. Campbell Grant publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan H. Campbell Grant sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Evan H. Campbell Grant D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan H. Campbell Grant sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evan H. Campbell Grant is a researcher affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with an emphasis on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling. Their research also intersects with Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, as well as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • A Synthesis of Evidence of Drivers of Amphibian Declines (2020), published in Herpetologica
  • Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity (2022), published in Science
  • Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) not detected in an intensive survey of wild North American amphibians (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • A National-Scale Assessment of Mercury Bioaccumulation in United States National Parks Using Dragonfly Larvae As Biosentinels through a Citizen-Science Framework (2020), published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Identifying research needs to inform white-nose syndrome management decisions (2020), published in Conservation Science and Practice

Their research topics encompass:

  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Journal of Herpetology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Conservation
  • Herpetologica

Collaborations are a significant component of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Brittany A. Mosher
  • Graziella V. DiRenzo
  • Adrianne B. Brand
  • Michael C. Runge
  • Erin Muths

Best Publications

  • Presence‐only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?

    Charles B. Yackulic;Charles B. Yackulic;Richard Chandler;Elise F. Zipkin;J. Andrew Royle

  • Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks.

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;Winsor H. Lowe;William F. Fagan

  • Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods

    James D. Nichols;Larissa L. Bailey;Allan F. O’Connell;Neil W. Talancy

  • Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: non‐detection and species misidentification

    David A Miller;James D Nichols;Brett T Mcclintock;Evan H Campbell Grant

  • Metacommunity theory as a multispecies, multiscale framework for studying the influence of river network structure on riverine communities and ecosystems

    Bryan L. Brown;Christopher M. Swan;Daniel A. Auerbach;Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Quantitative evidence for the effects of multiple drivers on continental-scale amphibian declines

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;David A. W. Miller;Benedikt R. Schmidt;Michael J. Adams

  • Trends in Amphibian Occupancy in the United States

    Michael J. Adams;David A. W. Miller;David A. W. Miller;Erin Muths;Paul Stephen Corn

  • Use of multiple dispersal pathways facilitates amphibian persistence in stream networks

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;James D. Nichols;Winsor H. Lowe;William F. Fagan

  • Evaluating the predictive abilities of community occupancy models using AUC while accounting for imperfect detection

    Elise F. Zipkin;Elise F. Zipkin;Evan H. Campbell Grant;William F. Fagan

  • Effects of host species and environment on the skin microbiome of Plethodontid salamanders

    Carly R. Muletz Wolz;Carly R. Muletz Wolz;Stephanie A. Yarwood;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Robert C. Fleischer

  • Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities

    David A. W. Miller;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Erin Muths;Staci M. Amburgey

  • A Synthesis of Evidence of Drivers of Amphibian Declines

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;David A.W. Miller;Erin Muths

  • Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity

    Unknown

  • Modeling structured population dynamics using data from unmarked individuals

    Elise F. Zipkin;James T. Thorson;Kevin See;Heather J. Lynch

  • Experimental investigation of false positive errors in auditory species occurrence surveys.

    David A. W. Miller;Linda A. Weir;Brett T. McClintock;Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: patches, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes

    Tibor Erős;Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Visual Implant Elastomer Mark Retention Through Metamorphosis in Amphibian Larvae

    Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

    Evan H Campbell Grant;Erin Muths;Rachel A Katz;Rachel A Katz;Stefano Canessa

  • Interbasin water transfer, riverine connectivity, and spatial controls on fish biodiversity.

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;Heather J. Lynch;Rachata Muneepeerakul;Muthukumarasamy Arunachalam

  • Spatial variation in risk and consequence of Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans introduction in the USA.

    Katherine L. D. Richgels;Katherine L. D. Richgels;Robin E. Russell;Michael J. Adams;C. LeAnn White

  • Relaxing the closure assumption in occupancy models: staggered arrival and departure times

    William L. Kendall;James E. Hines;James D. Nichols;Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Landscape matrix mediates occupancy dynamics of Neotropical avian insectivores.

    Christina M. Kennedy;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Maile C. Neel;William F. Fagan

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. W. Miller
David A. W. Miller Pennsylvania State University
Erin Muths
Erin Muths United States Geological Survey
Larissa L. Bailey
Larissa L. Bailey Colorado State University
Elise F. Zipkin
Elise F. Zipkin Michigan State University
Karen R. Lips
Karen R. Lips University of Maryland, College Park
James D. Nichols
James D. Nichols United States Geological Survey
Robin E. Russell
Robin E. Russell United States Geological Survey
Susan C. Walls
Susan C. Walls United States Geological Survey
Benedikt R. Schmidt
Benedikt R. Schmidt University of Zurich
William F. Fagan
William F. Fagan University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution unlocks a range of interdisciplinary career opportunities, from environmental consulting to research and education. Many related fields now offer flexible learning options online, enabling students to tailor their academic journey to fit unique career goals.

For example, a strong foundation in mathematics is essential for analyzing ecological data, making a bachelor in mathematics online a valuable complementary degree. Those interested in the design and communication side of ecology may consider programs such as the best 2 year graphic design degree online, which equips students to visualize and present scientific findings.

Architecture intersects with sustainable environments, and naab-accredited online architecture degrees focus on ecological design and conservation. Alternatively, for those seeking even more flexibility in combining interests, exploring online interdisciplinary studies admissions and costs can open doors to customizable education pathways that integrate ecology, policy, and other relevant fields.

Online degrees not only enable students worldwide to access quality education but also prepare graduates for diverse, evolving career landscapes in ecology, sustainability, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Evan H. Campbell Grant

Trending Scientists