World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6122
World Ranking
7752
National Ranking
2760

Erin Muths publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Muths sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erin Muths D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Muths sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erin Muths is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Ecological Modeling. Additional subfields include Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics within biological and environmental sciences. Main topics include:

  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Frequent publication venues for Erin Muths reflect a focus on herpetological and ecological research. These include:

  • Herpetologica
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Scientific Reports
  • Biological Conservation
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Research collaborations are an important aspect of Erin Muths' career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Blake R. Hossack
  • Evan H. Campbell Grant
  • Brent H. Sigafus
  • Larissa L. Bailey
  • Brian J. Halstead

Among recent publications associated with the scientist, notable papers include:

  • "Determinants and Consequences of Dispersal in Vertebrates with Complex Life Cycles: A Review of Pond-Breeding Amphibians," 2020, The Quarterly Review of Biology
  • "A Synthesis of Evidence of Drivers of Amphibian Declines," 2020, Herpetologica
  • "Amphibian Population Declines: 30 Years of Progress in Confronting a Complex Problem," 2020, Herpetologica
  • "Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity," 2022, Science
  • "Why disease ecology needs life-history theory: a host perspective," 2021, Ecology Letters

Best Publications

  • Evidence for disease-related amphibian decline in Colorado

    Erin Muths;Paul Stephen Corn;Allan P Pessier;D Earl Green

  • Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis

    Douglas C. Woodhams;Douglas C. Woodhams;Jaime Bosch;Cheryl J. Briggs;Scott Cashins

  • Quantitative evidence for the effects of multiple drivers on continental-scale amphibian declines

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;David A. W. Miller;Benedikt R. Schmidt;Michael J. Adams

  • Non-native and native organisms moving into high elevation and high latitude ecosystems in an era of climate change : new challenges for ecology and conservation

    Aníbal Pauchard;Ann Milbau;Ann Milbau;Ann Albihn;Ann Albihn;Jake Alexander

  • Trends in Amphibian Occupancy in the United States

    Michael J. Adams;David A. W. Miller;David A. W. Miller;Erin Muths;Paul Stephen Corn

  • Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycoses in nature

    Trenton W. J. Garner;Benedikt R. Schmidt;An Martel;Frank Pasmans

  • Effects of amphibian chytrid fungus on individual survival probability in wild boreal toads.

    David S. Pilliod;Erin Muths;Rick D. Scherer;Rick D. Scherer;Paul E. Bartelt

  • Pesticide concentrations in frog tissue and wetland habitats in a landscape dominated by agriculture.

    Kelly L. Smalling;Rebecca A. Reeves;Erin Muths;Mark Vandever

  • Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities

    David A. W. Miller;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Erin Muths;Staci M. Amburgey

  • Compensatory effects of recruitment and survival when amphibian populations are perturbed by disease

    Erin Muths;Rick D. Scherer;Rick D. Scherer;David S. Pilliod

  • Distribution and environmental limitations of an amphibian pathogen in the Rocky Mountains, USA

    Erin Muths;David S. Pilliod;Lauren J. Livo

  • Determinants and consequences of dispersal in vertebrates with complex life cycles: A review of pond-breeding amphibians

    Hugo Cayuela;Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez;Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez;Loïc Teulier;Íñigo Martínez-Solano

  • A Synthesis of Evidence of Drivers of Amphibian Declines

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;David A.W. Miller;Erin Muths

  • Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity

    Unknown

  • Home Range and Movements of Boreal Toads in Undisturbed Habitat

    Erin Muths

  • Amphibian Population Declines: 30 Years of Progress in Confronting a Complex Problem

    David M. Green;Michael J Lannoo;David LesBarreres;Erin L. Muths

  • Spatial occupancy models for predicting metapopulation dynamics and viability following reintroduction

    Richard B. Chandler;Erin L. Muths;Brent H. Sigafus;Cecil R. Schwalbe

  • An evaluation of weather and disease as causes of decline in two populations of boreal toads

    Rick D. Scherer;Erin L. Muths;Barry R. Noon;Paul Stephen Corn

  • Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

    Evan H Campbell Grant;Erin Muths;Rachel A Katz;Rachel A Katz;Stefano Canessa

  • VARIABLE BREEDING PHENOLOGY AFFECTS THE EXPOSURE OF AMPHIBIAN EMBRYOS TO ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION

    Paul Stephen Corn;Erin Muths

  • Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.

    Paige E. Howell;Erin Muths;Blake R. Hossack;Brent H. Sigafus

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Stephen Corn
Paul Stephen Corn United States Geological Survey
Larissa L. Bailey
Larissa L. Bailey Colorado State University
Benedikt R. Schmidt
Benedikt R. Schmidt University of Zurich
Evan H. Campbell Grant
Evan H. Campbell Grant United States Geological Survey
David S. Pilliod
David S. Pilliod United States Geological Survey
Robert N. Fisher
Robert N. Fisher United States Geological Survey
David A. W. Miller
David A. W. Miller Pennsylvania State University
Susan C. Walls
Susan C. Walls United States Geological Survey
Pieter T. J. Johnson
Pieter T. J. Johnson University of Colorado Boulder
Gary M. Fellers
Gary M. Fellers United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads students to consider related fields that complement their knowledge and expand career opportunities. For those looking for a broad academic foundation, a cheap online general studies degree can provide flexibility and affordability while covering multiple disciplines.

Students eager to complete their degree efficiently might explore what the easiest degree to get options are, many of which include programs related to natural sciences or conservation studies. These pathways often balance accessibility with practical skills.

For those specifically interested in earth sciences, pursuing the best online geology degree offers in-depth knowledge about the planet’s physical structure — essential for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, or research.

Additionally, expertise in spatial data is increasingly valuable. Colleges with gis programs train students in Geographic Information Systems, a critical tool for environmental planning, urban development, and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Erin Muths

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles