World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
34
Citations
6302
World Ranking
867
National Ranking
48

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
5071
World Ranking
7573
National Ranking
587

Ben C. Scheele publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ben C. Scheele sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ben C. Scheele D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ben C. Scheele sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Ben C. Scheele is affiliated with the Australian National University and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The scientist's published work reflects a focus on topics such as Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, and Land Use and Ecosystem Services.

Ben C. Scheele has contributed to various academic journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Biological Conservation
  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • PLoS ONE
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Recent papers include:

  • Impact of 2019-2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019-2020 Australian megafires, 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019-2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions, 2021, Diversity and Distributions
  • A checklist of attributes for effective monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Why We Need to Invest in Large-Scale, Long-Term Monitoring Programs in Landscape Ecology and Conservation Biology, 2022, Current Landscape Ecology Reports

Collaborations are a notable aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • David B. Lindenmayer
  • John C. Z. Woinarski
  • David Newell
  • Wade Blanchard
  • Stephen T. Garnett

Best Publications

  • Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity

    Ben C. Scheele;Ben C. Scheele;Frank Pasmans;Lee F. Skerratt;Lee Berger

  • Impact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat

    Michelle Ward;Ayesha I. T. Tulloch;Ayesha I. T. Tulloch;James Q. Radford;Brooke A. Williams

  • Interventions for Reducing Extinction Risk in Chytridiomycosis-Threatened Amphibians

    Ben C. Scheele;Ben C. Scheele;David A. Hunter;Laura Frances Grogan;Lee Berger

  • After the epidemic: Ongoing declines, stabilizations and recoveries in amphibians afflicted by chytridiomycosis

    Ben C. Scheele;Lee F. Skerratt;Laura F. Grogan;David A. Hunter

  • Niche Contractions in Declining Species: Mechanisms and Consequences

    Ben C. Scheele;Claire N. Foster;Samuel C. Banks;David B Lindenmayer

  • Do not publish

    David B Lindenmayer;Ben Scheele

  • The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. Systematic review

    Don A. Driscoll;Sam C. Banks;Philip S. Barton;Karen Ikin

  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time‐bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019–2020 Australian megafires

    Unknown

  • Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria

    David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Michael Mahony;Harry Hines;Jane Elith

  • How to improve threatened species management: An Australian perspective.

    Ben C. Scheele;Sarah Legge;D. P. Armstrong;P. Copley

  • Low impact of chytridiomycosis on frog recruitment enables persistence in refuges despite high adult mortality

    Ben C. Scheele;Ben C. Scheele;David A. Hunter;Lee F. Skerratt;Laura A. Brannelly

  • Why We Need to Invest in Large-Scale, Long-Term Monitoring Programs in Landscape Ecology and Conservation Biology

    Unknown

  • Continental-scale assessment reveals inadequate monitoring for threatened vertebrates in a megadiverse country

    Benjamin Scheele;Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;Wade Blanchard;Stephen Garnett

  • Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019–2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions

    Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;John C.Z. Woinarski;Ben C. Scheele;Stephen T. Garnett

  • Priorities for management of chytridiomycosis in Australia: saving frogs from extinction

    Lee F. Skerratt;Lee F. Skerratt;Lee Berger;Lee Berger;Nick Clemann;Dave A. Hunter

  • How to ensure threatened species monitoring leads to threatened species conservation

    Natasha M. Robinson;Ben C. Scheele;Sarah Legge;Darren M. Southwell

  • Reservoir-host amplification of disease impact in an endangered amphibian

    Ben C. Scheele;Ben C. Scheele;David A. Hunter;Laura A. Brannelly;Lee F. Skerratt

  • Decline and re-expansion of an amphibian with high prevalence of chytrid fungus

    Ben C. Scheele;Fiorenzo Guarino;William Osborne;David A. Hunter

  • A checklist of attributes for effective monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems.

    David B Lindenmayer;John Woinarski;Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;Darren Southwell

  • The response of arboreal marsupials to long‐term changes in forest disturbance

    David B. Lindenmayer;Wade Blanchard;David Blair;Lachlan McBurney

  • Key perspectives on early successional forests subject to stand-replacing disturbances

    David B. Lindenmayer;Martin J. Westgate;Ben C. Scheele;Claire N. Foster

  • Living with the enemy: Facilitating amphibian coexistence with disease

    Benjamin Scheele;Claire Foster;David A. Hunter;David B Lindenmayer

  • Decision‐making for mitigating wildlife diseases: From theory to practice for an emerging fungal pathogen of amphibians

    Stefano Canessa;Claudio Bozzuto;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Sam S. Cruickshank

  • Evolution of resistance to chytridiomycosis is associated with a robust early immune response

    Laura F. Grogan;Laura F. Grogan;Laura F. Grogan;Scott D. Cashins;Lee F. Skerratt;Lee Berger

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Lee F. Skerratt
Lee F. Skerratt University of Melbourne
Don A. Driscoll
Don A. Driscoll Deakin University
Lee Berger
Lee Berger University of Melbourne
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Sam C. Banks
Sam C. Banks Charles Darwin University
Trenton W. J. Garner
Trenton W. J. Garner Zoological Society of London
Sarah Legge
Sarah Legge Australian National University
Wade Blanchard
Wade Blanchard Australian National University
Juan M. Guayasamin
Juan M. Guayasamin Universidad San Francisco de Quito

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can pave the way to many exciting and interdisciplinary careers. Today’s digital landscape makes it easier than ever to enhance your qualifications with flexible online degree programs. Whether you’re interested in scientific research, environmental policy, or education, there are a variety of degrees that complement your studies or enable a career shift.

For example, professionals considering a switch in fields might find inspiration from those who have transitioned from teacher to SLP. If design thinking or sustainable environments intrigue you, consider the architecture online degree. Analytical minds often excel by pursuing online math degree programs to strengthen their quantitative and research skills. Alternatively, those with a creative edge may thrive by exploring the best online graphic design programs.

These diverse degree options can open unique career pathways and empower you to make a meaningful impact in science, design, or education. Explore what works best for your aspirations and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Ben C. Scheele

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles