World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
42196
World Ranking
9927
National Ranking
5109

Paul M. Vespa publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Vespa sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 481 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul M. Vespa D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Vespa sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul M. Vespa is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research focuses mainly on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to several subfields such as Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics, prominently including Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Epilepsy research and treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology.

Frequent publication venues for this scientist include:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Intensive Care Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul M. Vespa comprise:

  • Martin M. Monti
  • J. Claude Hemphill
  • Brandon Foreman
  • Joseph T. Giacino
  • Yelena G. Bodien

Selected recent publications authored or co-authored by Paul M. Vespa include:

  • "Global Incidence of Neurological Manifestations Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19-A Report for the GCS-NeuroCOVID Consortium and the ENERGY Consortium," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)," 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • "The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting," 2020, Neurocritical Care
  • "Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study," 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    E. Sander Connolly;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;Colin P. Derdeyn

  • Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group.

    Joseph Broderick;Sander Connolly;Edward Feldmann;Daniel Hanley

  • Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Status Epilepticus

    Gretchen M. Brophy;Rodney Bell;Jan Claassen;Brian Alldredge

  • American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version.

    Lawrence J. Hirsch;S. M. Laroche;N. Gaspard;E. Gerard

  • Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

    Michael N. Diringer;Thomas P. Bleck;J. Claude Hemphill;David Menon

  • Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis

    Michael R Wilson;Hannah A Sample;Kelsey C Zorn;Shaun Arevalo

  • Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver;Jeffrey L. Saver;James Mattiello;Sidney Starkman;Sidney Starkman

  • Increased incidence and impact of nonconvulsive and convulsive seizures after traumatic brain injury as detected by continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

    Paul M. Vespa;Marc R. Nuwer;Valeriy Nenov;Elisabeth Ronne-Engstrom

  • Cerebral hyperglycolysis following severe traumatic brain injury in humans: a positron emission tomography study

    Marvin Bergsneider;David A. Hovda;Ehud Shalmon;Daniel F. Kelly

  • Metabolic Crisis without Brain Ischemia is Common after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Combined Microdialysis and Positron Emission Tomography Study:

    Paul Vespa;Marvin Bergsneider;Nayoa Hattori;Hsiao-Ming Wu

  • Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage A factor in progressive midline shift and outcome

    Paul M. Vespa;K. O'Phelan;M. Shah;J. Mirabelli

  • Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

    Peter Le Roux;David Krishna Menon;Giuseppe Citerio;Paul Vespa

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Microbleeds Before Thrombolysis An Emerging Application

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver;J. Pablo Villablanca;Gary Duckwiler

  • Nonconvulsive electrographic seizures after traumatic brain injury result in a delayed, prolonged increase in intracranial pressure and metabolic crisis.

    Paul M. Vespa;Chad Miller;David McArthur;Mathew Eliseo

  • Analysis of Thrombi Retrieved From Cerebral Arteries of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Victor J. Marder;Dennis J. Chute;Sidney Starkman;Anna M. Abolian

  • Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial.

    Daniel F Hanley;Karen Lane;Nichol McBee;Wendy Ziai

  • A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)

    Gregory W. J. Hawryluk;Sergio Aguilera;Andras Buki;Eileen Bulger

  • Translational Neurochemical Research in Acute Human Brain Injury: The Current Status and Potential Future for Cerebral Microdialysis

    Lars Hillered;Paul M. Vespa;David A. Hovda

  • Intensive insulin therapy reduces microdialysis glucose values without altering glucose utilization or improving the lactate/pyruvate ratio after traumatic brain injury.

    Paul Vespa;Robert Boonyaputthikul;David L. McArthur;Chad Miller

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Decreases Perihematomal Edema

    W. Andrew Mould;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;John Muschelli;Karen Lane

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil A. Martin
Neil A. Martin University of California, Los Angeles
David A. Hovda
David A. Hovda University of California, Los Angeles
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Gary Duckwiler
Gary Duckwiler University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
Xiao Hu
Xiao Hu University of Hong Kong
Fernando Vinuela
Fernando Vinuela University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffry R. Alger
Jeffry R. Alger University of California, Los Angeles
John D. Van Horn
John D. Van Horn University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA opens many possibilities beyond the traditional MD route. Many students now choose nursing or allied health degrees because of the flexible, affordable online options available today.

For registered nurses looking to advance, seeking out the cheapest rn to bsn online programs can make further education both accessible and affordable. These programs help nurses deepen their knowledge and increase their career prospects.

If you’re already an RN, it’s also worth investigating the cheapest rn to bsn online options that best fit your schedule and budget. These online degrees often allow you to work while studying.

For those interested in advanced practice or teaching, choosing the cheapest phd nursing programs can significantly reduce student debt and open doors to research and academic roles.

If you don’t have a nursing background but want to become an advanced nurse, there are entry level msn programs online that let you switch careers quickly and efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Vespa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles