World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10846 10189 1030 983 493 33322

Peter Smielewski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Smielewski between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Smielewski published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2021. 16 of the 443 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2021. 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 48 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

443 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Smielewski: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 4
1995 2
1996 6
1997 7
1998 5
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 7
2004 5
2005 10
2006 5
2007 8
2008 12
2009 12
2010 12
2011 9
2012 30
2013 11
2014 17
2015 21
2016 30
2017 29
2018 38
2019 26
2020 39
2021 48
2022 4
2023 12
2024 7
2025 15
2026 1
Total 443
Download as CSV

Peter Smielewski publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Smielewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 493 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 493
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Smielewski D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Smielewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Smielewski is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work centers on topics related to traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, traumatic brain injury research, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, optical imaging and spectroscopy techniques, S100 proteins and annexins, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, and acute ischemic stroke management.

Peter Smielewski has contributed to multiple papers, including:

  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Continuous cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of advances in neurocritical care (2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Incidence, Risk Factors, and Effects on Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury (2020, CHEST Journal)
  • Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: An Overview of Recent Advances in Personalized Medicine (2022, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • Brain Tissue Oxygen and Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Exploratory Analysis of Insult Burden (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter Smielewski include:

  • Marek Czosnyka
  • Erta Beqiri
  • Ari Ercole
  • Frederick A. Zeiler
  • Manuel Cabeleira

Peter Smielewski's research has appeared in various scientific venues that publish neurocritical care and trauma-related research. The prominent publication venues include:

  • Neurocritical Care
  • Critical Care
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum
  • Acta Neurochirurgica

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial

    Thomas Santarius;Peter J Kirkpatrick;Dharmendra Ganesan;Hui Ling Chia

  • Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients

    M Czosnyka;P Smielewski;P Kirk-patrick;D K Menon

  • Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury.

    Marcel J.H. Aries;Marek Czosnyka;Karol P. Budohoski;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Limbic hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    Peter J Nestor;Tim D Fryer;Peter Smielewski;John R Hodges;John R Hodges

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Diffusion limited oxygen delivery following head injury.

    David K. Menon;Jonathan P. Coles;Arun K. Gupta;Tim D. Fryer

  • Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.

    E. Sorrentino;J. Diedler;M. Kasprowicz;K. P. Budohoski

  • Cerebral extracellular chemistry and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study of 223 patients

    Ivan Timofeev;Keri L H Carpenter;Jürgens Nortje;Pippa G Al-Rawi

  • Predictive value of Glasgow coma scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years

    M Balestreri;M Czosnyka;D A Chatfield;L A Steiner

  • Effect of hyperventilation on cerebral blood flow in traumatic head injury: clinical relevance and monitoring correlates.

    Jonathan P. Coles;Pawan S. Minhas;Tim D. Fryer;Peter Smielewski

  • Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit

    Nino Stocchetti;Nino Stocchetti;Marco Carbonara;Giuseppe Citerio;Ari Ercole

  • Consensus statement from the 2014 International Microdialysis Forum

    Peter J. Hutchinson;Ibrahim Jalloh;Adel Helmy;Keri L.H. Carpenter

  • Real-Time Continuous Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    Kenneth Brady;Brijen Joshi;Christian Zweifel;Peter Smielewski

  • Evaluation of a Near-Infrared Spectrometer (NIRO 300) for the Detection of Intracranial Oxygenation Changes in the Adult Head

    Pippa G. Al-Rawi;Peter Smielewski;Peter J. Kirkpatrick

  • Hyperventilation following head injury: effect on ischemic burden and cerebral oxidative metabolism.

    Jonathan P. Coles;Tim D. Fryer;Martin R. Coleman;Peter Smielewski

  • Transcranial Doppler Pulsatility Index: What it is and What it Isn’t

    Nicolás de Riva;Nicolás de Riva;Karol P. Budohoski;Peter Smielewski;Magdalena Kasprowicz;Magdalena Kasprowicz

  • Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium

    David Pfister;Martin Siegemund;Salome Dell-Kuster;Peter Smielewski

  • Effect of decompressive craniectomy on intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal compensation following traumatic brain injury.

    Ivan Timofeev;Marek Czosnyka;Jurgens Nortje;Peter Smielewski

  • Impairment of Cerebral Autoregulation Predicts Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Prospective Observational Study

    Karol P. Budohoski;Marek Czosnyka;Peter Smielewski;Magdalena Kasprowicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Peter J. Hutchinson
Peter J. Hutchinson University of Cambridge
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge
Nino Stocchetti
Nino Stocchetti University of Milan
Tim D. Fryer
Tim D. Fryer University of Cambridge
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld Monash University
Guy B. Williams
Guy B. Williams University of Cambridge
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying medicine in the USA opens up multiple career pathways beyond becoming a doctor. Health care professionals are in high demand, and online degree programs make it easier than ever to pursue a career in the field—either as a first step or as a way to further your qualifications.

For those interested in nursing, there are options such as the lpn program no entrance exam, which allow prospective nurses to start their journey without standardized entrance barriers. If you’re looking to lead or manage healthcare teams, consider an online healthcare administration degree. These programs prepare graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Advancing from nursing to clinical roles is also possible. Programs like adn to fnp bridge degrees help registered nurses move toward family nurse practitioner credentials, expanding career options and earning potential. Additionally, those interested in wellness and preventive care can explore online nutrition degree programs to become nutritionists or health coaches.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Smielewski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles