World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
56953
World Ranking
3868
National Ranking
385

Marek Czosnyka publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Czosnyka sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 925 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marek Czosnyka D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Czosnyka sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marek Czosnyka is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Neurology, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

Marek Czosnyka has published extensively in these areas, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Neurocritical Care (25 publications)
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (21 publications)
  • Brain and Spine (13 publications)
  • Critical Care (9 publications)
  • Acta Neurochirurgica (9 publications)

Some of their recent noteworthy publications include:

  • "Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research" (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • "Targeting Autoregulation-Guided Cerebral Perfusion Pressure after Traumatic Brain Injury (COGiTATE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial" (2021, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • "Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury" (2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  • "Differences between Men and Women in Treatment and Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury" (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • "Impact of duration and magnitude of raised intracranial pressure on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI high-resolution group study" (2020, PLoS ONE)

Marek Czosnyka frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Ari Ercole (89 joint publications)
  • Manuel Cabeleira (82 joint publications)
  • Giuseppe Citerio (74 joint publications)
  • Bart Depreitere (72 joint publications)
  • Shirin Frisvold (69 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.

    Peter J. Hutchinson;Angelos G. Kolias;Ivan S. Timofeev;Elizabeth A. Corteen

  • Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure

    M Czosnyka;J D Pickard

  • Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury

    Marek Czosnyka;Piotr Smielewski;Peter Kirkpatrick;Rodney J. Laing

  • Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

    Luzius A. Steiner;Marek Czosnyka;Stefan K. Piechnik;Piotr Smielewski

  • Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients

    M Czosnyka;P Smielewski;P Kirk-patrick;D K Menon

  • Effects of Acute Treatment With Pravastatin on Cerebral Vasospasm, Autoregulation, and Delayed Ischemic Deficits After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Phase II Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Ming-Yuan Tseng;Marek Czosnyka;Hugh Richards;John D. Pickard

  • Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury.

    Marcel J.H. Aries;Marek Czosnyka;Karol P. Budohoski;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

    Peter Le Roux;David Krishna Menon;Giuseppe Citerio;Paul Vespa

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury

    Marcella Balestreri;Marek Czosnyka;Peter Hutchinson;Luzius A. Steiner;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.

    E. Sorrentino;J. Diedler;M. Kasprowicz;K. P. Budohoski

  • Cerebral extracellular chemistry and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study of 223 patients

    Ivan Timofeev;Keri L H Carpenter;Jürgens Nortje;Pippa G Al-Rawi

  • Predictive value of Glasgow coma scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years

    M Balestreri;M Czosnyka;D A Chatfield;L A Steiner

  • Monitoring of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation: Facts, Myths, and Missing Links

    Marek Czosnyka;Kenneth Martin Brady;Matthias Reinhard;Piotr Smielewski

  • Cerebral autoregulation following head injury.

    Marek Czosnyka;Piotr Smielewski;Stefan Piechnik;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Continuous Time-Domain Analysis of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

    Kenneth Martin Brady;Jennifer K. Lee;Kathleen K. Kibler;Piotr Smielewski

  • Real-Time Continuous Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    Kenneth Brady;Brijen Joshi;Christian Zweifel;Peter Smielewski

  • Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Chiara Robba;Gregorio Santori;Marek Czosnyka;Marek Czosnyka;Francesco Corradi

  • Cerebral perfusion pressure in head-injured patients: a noninvasive assessment using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.

    Marek Czosnyka;Basil F. Matta;Piotr Smielewski;Peter J. Kirkpatrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Smielewski
Peter Smielewski University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Peter J. Hutchinson
Peter J. Hutchinson University of Cambridge
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge
Nino Stocchetti
Nino Stocchetti University of Milan
Stefan K Piechnik
Stefan K Piechnik University of Oxford
Giuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio University of Milano-Bicocca
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld Monash University
Philip Lewis
Philip Lewis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

After completing a medical degree in the USA, graduates have various options for further education and career advancement. Online programs have become increasingly popular among working professionals seeking flexible, accredited pathways into healthcare leadership, pharmacy, advanced practice, and health information management.

For those interested in healthcare administration, pursuing the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration can open doors to executive and management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Nurses aiming to provide specialized care or move into leadership positions can explore the cheapest dnp programs online to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice, enhancing their clinical and decision-making skills.

Those interested in pharmaceuticals can consider a pharmacy degree online, a flexible option designed for aspiring pharmacists ready to serve in various healthcare environments.

Additionally, the field of health information continues to grow. Earning credentials through respected him programs can set you up for roles that bridge healthcare, data, and patient privacy.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Czosnyka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles