World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nino Stocchetti

Nino Stocchetti

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14448 13605 554 531 458 32898

Nino Stocchetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nino Stocchetti between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nino Stocchetti published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 3 of the 496 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

496 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nino Stocchetti: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 2
1986 3
1987 5
1988 3
1989 2
1990 4
1991 4
1992 4
1993 6
1994 4
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 13
1999 15
2000 15
2001 7
2002 8
2003 12
2004 16
2005 16
2006 14
2007 24
2008 29
2009 15
2010 12
2011 20
2012 9
2013 19
2014 28
2015 9
2016 12
2017 9
2018 10
2019 22
2020 30
2021 29
2022 24
2023 20
2024 9
2025 2
2026 1
Total 496
Download as CSV

Nino Stocchetti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nino Stocchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 458 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 458
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nino Stocchetti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nino Stocchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nino Stocchetti is affiliated with the University of Milan in Italy. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine with an emphasis on Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

Their main research topics include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Stocchetti has contributed to various high-impact journals, frequently publishing in:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Critical Care
  • The Lancet Neurology

Notable recent papers by or associated with Stocchetti include:

  • "Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research" (2022), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • "A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)" (2020), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute brain injury in the intensive care unit (SYNAPSE-ICU): an international, prospective observational cohort study" (2021), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • "Management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: an update for the intensivist" (2022), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Intracranial pressure: current perspectives on physiology and monitoring" (2022), published in Intensive Care Medicine

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Giuseppe Citerio
  • Ari Ercole
  • Marco Carbonara
  • Marek Czosnyka
  • David Menon

Best Publications

  • Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults.

    Andrew I R Maas;Nino Stocchetti;Ross Bullock

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

    Michael N. Diringer;Thomas P. Bleck;J. Claude Hemphill;David Menon

  • The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time

    Graham Teasdale;Andrew Maas;Fiona Lecky;Geoffrey Manley

  • EBIC-Guidelines for Management of Severe Head Injury in Adults

    A. I. R. Maas;M. Dearden;G. M. Teasdale;R. Braakman

  • Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

    Peter Le Roux;David Krishna Menon;Giuseppe Citerio;Paul Vespa

  • The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries

    G D Murray;G M Teasdale;R Braakman;F Cohadon

  • A Clinical Trial of Progesterone for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Brett E. Skolnick;Andrew I. R. Maas;Raj K. Narayan;Roland Gerritsen van der Hoop

  • Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?

    D M Morales;N Marklund;D Lebold;H J Thompson

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)

    Gregory W. J. Hawryluk;Sergio Aguilera;Andras Buki;Eileen Bulger

  • Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM.

    Jan Claassen;Fabio S. Taccone;Peter Horn;Martin Holtkamp

  • Hypoxemia and arterial hypotension at the accident scene in head injury

    Nino Stocchetti;Adriano Furlan;Franco Volta

  • Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: a narrative review

    Nino Stocchetti;Elisa Roncati Zanier

  • Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension

    Nino Stocchetti;Andrew I R Maas

  • Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit

    Nino Stocchetti;Nino Stocchetti;Marco Carbonara;Giuseppe Citerio;Ari Ercole

  • Brain temperature, body core temperature, and intracranial pressure in acute cerebral damage

    S Rossi;E R Zanier;I Mauri;A Columbo

  • Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas.

    Lorenzo Bello;Marcello Gallucci;Marica Fava;Giorgio Carrabba

  • Temporal window of vulnerability to repetitive experimental concussive brain injury.

    Luca Longhi;Kathryn E. Saatman;Scott Fujimoto;Ramesh Raghupathi

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio University of Milano-Bicocca
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
Fabio Silvio Taccone
Fabio Silvio Taccone Université Libre de Bruxelles
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Peter Smielewski
Peter Smielewski University of Cambridge
Mauro Oddo
Mauro Oddo University of Lausanne
Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter J. Hutchinson
Peter J. Hutchinson University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA is an evolving field, and many healthcare careers now start or advance through flexible online study. One popular path is an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, ideal for those interested in preventive care and public health. Programs in nutrition create opportunities to influence community wellness and pave the way toward graduate study.

For professionals aiming for leadership roles, top cahme-accredited mha programs offer robust training in healthcare administration. These degrees can fast-track careers in managing hospitals or large healthcare systems.

Existing registered nurses can advance with online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, earning a bachelor’s degree with maximum flexibility and no additional on-site requirements. This is a practical choice for working nurses seeking career growth.

Ambitious nurses may even consider the fastest dnp program for practice-based leadership, paving the way to advanced clinical or academic roles. These online options open new pathways for healthcare professionals, keeping pace with the demands of modern medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Nino Stocchetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles