World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lucia Regolin

Lucia Regolin

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8518
World Ranking
5725
National Ranking
100

Lucia Regolin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Regolin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lucia Regolin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Regolin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lucia Regolin is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily encompasses the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with significant contributions in subfields such as statistics and probability, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, social psychology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scholar's work covers a variety of topics related to cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, child and animal learning development, hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, animal vocal communication and behavior, primate behavior and ecology, animal behavior and reproduction, and animal nutrition and physiology.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Regolin are:

  • A sense of number in invertebrates (2020, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications)
  • Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks (2020, eLife)
  • Statistical learning in domestic chicks is modulated by strain and sex (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Hemispheric specialization in spatial versus ordinal processing in the day-old domestic chick (Gallus gallus) (2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences)
  • Infants' preferences for approachers over repulsers shift between 4 and 8 months of age (2022, Aggressive Behavior)

Regolin frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Maria Loconsole, Rosa Rugani, Giorgio Vallortígara, Massimo De Agrò, and Yujia Zhang. Collaboration counts indicate a strong ongoing research partnership.

The most common publication venues for Regolin's work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Scientific Reports, Animals, and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Best Publications

  • A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby

    Francesca Simion;Lucia Regolin;Hermann Bulf

  • Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line

    Rosa Rugani;Rosa Rugani;Giorgio Vallortigara;Konstantinos Priftis;Lucia Regolin

  • Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns

    Giorgio Vallortigara;Lucia Regolin;Fabio Marconato

  • Arithmetic in newborn chicks.

    Rosa Rugani;Laura Fontanari;Eleonora Simoni;Lucia Regolin

  • Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks

    Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Biological motion preference in humans at birth: role of dynamic and configural properties

    Lara Bardi;Lucia Regolin;Francesca Simion

  • Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks.

    Giorgio Vallortigara;Lucia Regolin

  • Innate sensitivity for self-propelled causal agency in newly hatched chicks

    Elena Mascalzoni;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks.

    Rosa Rugani;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • The evolution of social orienting: evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns.

    Orsola Rosa Salva;Teresa Farroni;Teresa Farroni;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli.

    Orsola Rosa-Salva;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks

    Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara;Mario Zanforlin

  • Numerical discrimination by frogs (Bombina orientalis).

    G. Stancher;R. Rugani;L. Regolin;G. Vallortigara

  • Lateral asymmetries due to preferences in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks

    G. Vallortigara;L. Regolin;G. Bortolomiol;L. Tommasi

  • Imprinted Numbers: Newborn Chicks' Sensitivity to Number vs. Continuous Extent of Objects They Have Been Reared with.

    Rosa Rugani;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure.

    Lucia Regolin;Luca Tommasi;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Cerebral and behavioural assymetries in animal social recognition

    Orsola Rosa Salva;Lucia Regolin;Elena Mascalzoni;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position.

    Rosa Rugani;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara

  • A mental number line in human newborns

    Elisa Di Giorgio;Marco Lunghi;Rosa Rugani;Rosa Rugani;Lucia Regolin

  • Detour behaviour, imprinting and visual lateralization in the domestic chick

    Giorgio Vallortigara;Lucia Regolin;Piero Pagni

  • The cradle of causal reasoning: newborns' preference for physical causality.

    Elena Mascalzoni;Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara;Francesca Simion

  • Perceptual and motivational aspects of detour behaviour in young chicks

    Lucia Regolin;Giorgio Vallortigara;Mario Zanforlin

  • Numerical abstraction in young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).

    Rosa Rugani;Giorgio Vallortigara;Lucia Regolin

Frequent Co-Authors

Giorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara University of Trento
Francesca Simion
Francesca Simion University of Padua
Lesley J. Rogers
Lesley J. Rogers University of New England
Luca Tommasi
Luca Tommasi University of Chieti-Pescara
Teresa Farroni
Teresa Farroni University of Padua
Steven P. R. Rose
Steven P. R. Rose The Open University
Onur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün Ruhr University Bochum
Paolo Carnier
Paolo Carnier University of Padua
Marco Bertamini
Marco Bertamini University of Padua
Daniel Osorio
Daniel Osorio University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree program involves considering many factors, including cost, flexibility, and future career options. More students are exploring online psychology degrees, which offer accessibility and affordability without sacrificing educational quality. The growing availability of accredited programs means aspiring psychologists can tailor their educational journey to fit personal interests and career goals.

Affordability is a key concern for many, and program costs can vary widely depending on location and school. For those seeking value, there are most affordable psychology degree programs in Indiana and affordable psychology degrees in Kentucky to consider. Urban areas also provide budget-friendly options, such as the cheapest psychology programs in Los Angeles and cheapest psychology programs in Louisville.

After earning an online psychology degree, graduates can pursue diverse career pathways. Opportunities range from mental health services and counseling to human resources, research, or advanced clinical training. Online study can be a practical first step towards a rewarding and impactful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Lucia Regolin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles