World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marco Bertamini

Marco Bertamini

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7662 7148 159 157 244 5567

Marco Bertamini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Bertamini between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Bertamini published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2018. 26 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2018. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 11 publications
1988 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Bertamini: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 6
2005 7
2006 7
2007 5
2008 6
2009 3
2010 10
2011 5
2012 11
2013 15
2014 12
2015 22
2016 19
2017 12
2018 23
2019 21
2020 16
2021 21
2022 17
2023 9
2024 15
2025 11
Total 295
Download as CSV

Marco Bertamini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Bertamini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 244 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 244
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Bertamini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Bertamini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco Bertamini is a researcher affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their work spans primarily across the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Bertamini's research contributions extend into subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, as well as statistics and probability.

Their research topics encompass a range of areas related to perception and brain function. Major topics addressed in Bertamini's work include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Color perception and design
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Aesthetic perception and analysis
  • Face recognition and perception

Some significant recent papers authored by or involving Bertamini include:

  • Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, published in BMC Psychiatry
  • Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model, 2021, published in PLoS ONE
  • The Italian COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (IT C19PRC): General Overview and Replication of the UK Study, 2020, published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Visual preference for abstract curvature and for interior spaces: Beyond undergraduate student samples., 2020, published in Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Individual differences in the Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions are stable across different contexts, 2020, published in Journal of Vision

Bertamini collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Alexis D. J. Makin
  • Giulia Rampone
  • John Tyson-Carr
  • Giulio Contemori
  • Luca Battaglini

Their publications often appear in specific venues known for cognitive and psychological sciences. Frequent publication venues for Bertamini are:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Vision
  • Symmetry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cortex

Best Publications

  • Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity

    Marco Bertamini;Letizia Palumbo;Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes;Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes;Mai Galatsidas

  • Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Unknown

  • Understanding projectile acceleration.

    Heiko Hecht;Marco Bertamini

  • Implicit Affective Evaluation of Visual Symmetry

    Alexis David James Makin;Anna Pecchinenda;Marco Bertamini

  • Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.

    Letizia Palumbo;Nicole Ruta;Marco Bertamini

  • Brain Activity in Response to Visual Symmetry

    Marco Bertamini;Alexis D.J. Makin

  • Amodal Completion of Partly Occluded Surfaces: Is There a Mosaic Stage?

    Nicola Bruno;Marco Bertamini;Fulvio Domini

  • Symmetry perception and affective responses: A combined EEG/EMG study

    Alexis D.J. Makin;Moon M Wilton;Anna Pecchinenda;Marco Bertamini

  • Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors

    Marco Bertamini;Alice Spooner;Heiko Hecht

  • Examining visual complexity and its influence on perceived duration.

    Letizia Palumbo;Ruth Ogden;Alexis James Makin;Marco Bertamini

  • Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level

    Marco Bertamini;Tyrone L. Yang;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.

    Katherine N Cotter;Paul J Silvia;Marco Bertamini;Letizia Palumbo

  • Implicit Association of Symmetry with Positive Valence, High Arousal and Simplicity

    Marco Bertamini;Alexis Makin;Giulia Rampone

  • Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model.

    Anna Panzeri;Marco Bertamini;Marco Bertamini;Sarah Butter;Liat Levita

  • The neural basis of visual symmetry and its role in mid- and high-level visual processing

    Marco Bertamini;Juha Silvanto;Anthony M. Norcia;Alexis D.J. Makin

  • The shape of holes

    Marco Bertamini;Camilla J Croucher

  • Hierarchical motion organization in random dot configurations.

    Marco Bertamini;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Naive optics: understanding the geometry of mirror reflections.

    Camilla J. Croucher;Marco Bertamini;Heiko Hecht

  • Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: The way a lock-and-key process works

    Marco Bertamini;Jay D. Friedenberg;Michael Kubovy

  • Haptic perception after a change in hand size.

    Nicola Bruno;Marco Bertamini

  • The Venus effect: people's understanding of mirror reflections in paintings.

    Marco Bertamini;Richard Latto;Alice Spooner

  • Memory for position and dynamic representations

    Marco Bertamini

Frequent Co-Authors

Kate M. Bennett
Kate M. Bennett University of Liverpool
Dennis R. Proffitt
Dennis R. Proffitt University of Virginia
Michael H. Herzog
Michael H. Herzog École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Paul J. Silvia
Paul J. Silvia University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Giorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara University of Trento
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Liat Levita
Liat Levita University of Sussex
Richard P. Bentall
Richard P. Bentall University of Sheffield
Christoph Redies
Christoph Redies Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open diverse career pathways, particularly in the growing fields of counseling and therapy. Many students interested in mental health careers choose to become Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs), a role that requires specialized graduate education and state-specific licensure.

Requirements for MFTs can differ depending on your location. For a detailed breakdown of how to become a marriage and family therapist in Santa Ana, you’ll learn about the necessary degrees, supervised clinical hours, and state exams needed to practice. Similarly, Scottsdale mft education requirements highlight region-specific coursework and internship expectations.

Those interested in practicing in Washington should look into Seattle mft certification requirements and Spokane mft education requirements for guidance on local licensing and training standards. Pursuing online psychology and MFT programs can help you meet these requirements more flexibly, paving the way toward meaningful and in-demand careers in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Bertamini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles