World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
4980
World Ranking
11321
National Ranking
5918

Helene Intraub publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helene Intraub sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Helene Intraub D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helene Intraub sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helene Intraub is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as the main subfield. Additional interdisciplinary interests include Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Human Motion and Animation
  • Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Color perception and design

Helene Intraub has published research in a variety of venues, such as:

  • Current Biology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Visual Cognition
  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent publications by Intraub include:

  • "Searching for boundary extension," 2020, published in Current Biology
  • "Anticipatory memory for regular and random patterns," 2020, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • "The effect of colour matching on perceptual integration of pictures and frames," 2021, published in Visual Cognition
  • "Neural correlates of boundary extension during visual imagination," 2024, published in Journal of Vision
  • "Neural correlates of boundary extension during visual imagination," 2025, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators include Banjit Singh, Timothy J. Vickery, Alyssa P. Levy, Kallie Sweetman, and Zoe Cronin. Collaboration with some of these co-authors has resulted in multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Wide-Angle Memories of Close-Up Scenes

    Helene Intraub;Michael Richardson

  • Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures.

    Helene Intraub

  • Looking at pictures but remembering scenes.

    Helene Intraub;Rachel S. Bender;Jennifer A. Mangels

  • Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory.

    Helene Intraub

  • Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures.

    Helene Intraub;Carmela V. Gottesman;Amy J. Bills

  • Boundary Extension for Briefly Glimpsed Photographs: Do Common Perceptual Processes Result in Unexpected Memory Distortions?

    Helene Intraub;Carmela V. Gottesman;Edward V. Willey;Ilan J. Zuk

  • The representation of visual scenes.

    Helene Intraub

  • Attenuated Boundary Extension Produces a Paradoxical Memory Advantage in Amnesic Patients

    Sinéad L. Mullally;Helene Intraub;Eleanor A. Maguire

  • Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact?

    Helene Intraub;Jennifer L. Bodamer

  • Beyond the Edges of a View: Boundary Extension in Human Scene-Selective Visual Cortex

    Soojin Park;Helene Intraub;Do Joon Yi;David Widders

  • Scenes, Spaces, and Memory Traces What Does the Hippocampus Do?

    Eleanor A. Maguire;Helene Intraub;Sinéad L. Mullally

  • Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes.

    Carmela V. Gottesman;Helene Intraub

  • Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures.

    Helene Intraub

  • Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

    Christopher A. Dickinson;Helene Intraub

  • The role of implicit naming in pictorial encoding.

    Helene Intraub

  • Reading and visual memory: remembering scenes that were never seen.

    Helene Intraub;James E. Hoffman

  • Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement?

    Helene Intraub

  • Rethinking visual scene perception.

    Helene Intraub

  • False Memory 1/20th of a Second Later What the Early Onset of Boundary Extension Reveals About Perception

    Helene Intraub;Christopher A. Dickinson

  • Looking at scenes while searching for numbers: Dividing attention multiplies space

    Helene Intraub;Karen K. Daniels;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Hoffman
James E. Hoffman University of Delaware
Jeremy M. Wolfe
Jeremy M. Wolfe Brigham and Women's Hospital
Eleanor A. Maguire
Eleanor A. Maguire University College London
Todd S. Horowitz
Todd S. Horowitz National Institutes of Health
Marvin M. Chun
Marvin M. Chun Yale University
Adele M. Hayes
Adele M. Hayes University of Delaware
Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Jamie O. Edgin
Jamie O. Edgin Virginia Tech
Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Elisa Ciaramelli
Elisa Ciaramelli University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career pathways, particularly in fields like counseling, therapy, and clinical care. Many students choose specialized routes, such as becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires a blend of academic credentials and state-specific licensure.

Understanding the Scottsdale mft education requirements is essential if you are planning to practice in Arizona. Each state has its own pathway and criteria. For instance, those interested in practicing in Washington should consider the steps outlined for how to become an mft in Seattle or how to become an mft in Spokane.

If your career goals take you to the Midwest, understanding how to become an mft in St. Louis will help you navigate the unique education and licensing standards there. Exploring these resources can guide you in selecting the right online degree and mapping a career pathway in psychology that matches both your interests and your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Helene Intraub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles