World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1834 1653 1079 950 222 32890

Daniel J. Simons publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel J. Simons between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel J. Simons published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2010. 16 of the 332 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2010. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
1969 2025

332 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel J. Simons: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 3
1985 4
1986 2
1987 3
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 7
1997 5
1998 6
1999 4
2000 12
2001 7
2002 7
2003 15
2004 12
2005 16
2006 8
2007 8
2008 8
2009 5
2010 30
2011 10
2012 10
2013 15
2014 14
2015 14
2016 18
2017 13
2018 10
2019 13
2020 3
2021 4
2022 4
2023 3
2024 11
2025 5
Total 332
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Simons publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Simons sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 222 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 222
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Simons D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Simons sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel J. Simons is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focused on physics and neuroscience, with an emphasis on subfields such as nuclear and high energy physics, cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and general decision sciences.

Their recent publications cover topics in both physics and behavioral sciences. Notable papers include:

  • The Trajectory of Truth: A Longitudinal Study of the Illusory Truth Effect, 2021, Journal of Cognition
  • A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Gamma-ray performance study of the HERD payload, 2021, Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference - PoS(ICRC2021)
  • Nerve Wrap for Local Delivery of FK506/Tacrolimus Accelerates Nerve Regeneration, 2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Form factor and model dependence in neutrino-nucleus cross section predictions, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their research output is distributed among several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Frequent co-authors in their work are:

  • Yifan Ding
  • Yannick Meurice
  • Connor M. Hults
  • Emma Henderson
  • Rishi Raja

The main topics of research include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Neutrino Physics Research
  • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Nerve injury and regeneration

This extensive body of work reflects a multidisciplinary approach, bridging gaps between physical sciences and cognitive neuroscience through both theoretical and experimental methods. Their investigations in particle physics focus on neutrino interactions and quantum chromodynamics, while their neuroscience-related work examines behavioral psychology, decision-making processes, and neural regeneration.

Best Publications

  • Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.

    Daniel J Simons;Christopher F Chabris

  • Change blindness: past, present, and future.

    Daniel J. Simons;Ronald A. Rensink

  • The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control.

    Walter R. Boot;Arthur F. Kramer;Daniel J. Simons;Monica Fabiani

  • Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction

    Daniel J. Simons;Daniel T. Levin

  • Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?:

    Daniel J. Simons;Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Susan E. Gathercole

  • The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us

    Christopher F. Chabris;Daniel J. Simons

  • Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers:

    Daniel J. Simons;Yuichi Shoda;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Current Approaches to Change Blindness

    Daniel J. Simons

  • Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.

    Steven L. Franconeri;Daniel J. Simons

  • Attentional capture and inattentional blindness

    Daniel J. Simons

  • Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures

    Daniel T. Levin;Daniel J. Simons

  • What You See Is What You Set: Sustained Inattentional Blindness and the Capture of Awareness.

    Steven B. Most;Brian J. Scholl;Erin R. Clifford;Daniel J. Simons

  • The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects

    Walter R. Boot;Daniel J. Simons;Cary Stothart;Cassie Stutts

  • The Value of Direct Replication

    Daniel J. Simons

  • In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail

    Daniel J. Simons

  • Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition

    Walter Richard Boot;Daniel P Blakely;Daniel J Simons

  • How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness

    Steven B. Most;Daniel J. Simons;Brian J. Scholl;Rachel Jimenez

  • Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy

    Elizabeth S. Spelke;Roberta Kestenbaum;Daniel J. Simons;Debra Wein

  • Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes

    Daniel J. Simons;Ranxiao Frances Wang

  • Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability.

    Daniel T. Levin;Nausheen Momen;Sarah B. Drivdahl;Daniel J. Simons

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Christopher F. Chabris
Christopher F. Chabris Geisinger Health System
Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Daniel Memmert
Daniel Memmert German Sport University Cologne
Steven Franconeri
Steven Franconeri Northwestern University
Philip Furley
Philip Furley German Sport University Cologne
Gabriele Gratton
Gabriele Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Monica Fabiani
Monica Fabiani University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Stephen R. Mitroff
Stephen R. Mitroff George Washington University
Kirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a range of online programs and career options. Many students consider becoming a licensed therapist or counselor, both of which require a blend of online coursework, supervised experience, and state-specific licensure. Popular fields include mental health counseling, clinical social work, and especially marriage and family therapy (MFT).

Pathways to becoming an MFT differ by location. For example, if you are interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Seattle, you will notice unique education and supervised clinical hour requirements. Similarly, aspiring therapists can discover how to become an mft in Spokane or review mft requirements in St. Louis for specific details about degrees, exams, and licensure. If you're considering the southeast, you can learn more about mft requirements in St. Petersburg.

Choosing an online psychology program allows for flexibility while maximizing career opportunities in various counseling and therapy fields across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Simons

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles