World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3664
World Ranking
10659
National Ranking
513

Philip Furley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Furley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Philip Furley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Furley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Reproducible research in sport and exercise psychology: The role of sample sizes

    Geoffrey Schweizer;Philip Furley

  • Working Memory, Attentional Control, and Expertise in Sports: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research

    Philip Furley;Greg Wood

  • "I spy with my little eye!": breadth of attention, inattentional blindness, and tactical decision making in team sports.

    Daniel Memmert;Philip Furley

  • The role of working memory in sport

    Philip Alexander Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making.

    Philip A. Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers

    Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • The dark side of visual awareness in sport: Inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task

    Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert;Christian Heller

  • Is ego depletion associated with increased distractibility? Results from a basketball free throw task

    Christoph Englert;Alex Bertrams;Philip Furley;Raôul R. D. Oudejans

  • Ego depletion, attentional control, and decision making in sport.

    Philip Furley;Alex Bertrams;Christoph Englert;Ana Delphia

  • Coaches’ implicit associations between size and giftedness: implications for the relative age effect

    Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • The two modes of an athlete: dual-process theories in the field of sport.

    Philip Furley;Geoffrey Schweizer;Alex Bertrams

  • Nonverbal behavior in soccer: the influence of dominant and submissive body language on the impression formation and expectancy of success of soccer players.

    Philip Furley;Matt Dicks;Daniel Memmert

  • Differences in spatial working memory as a function of team sports expertise: the Corsi Block-tapping task in sport psychological assessment

    Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities

    Carina Kreitz;Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert;Daniel J. Simons

  • Top 10 Research Questions Related to Teaching Games for Understanding

    Daniel Memmert;Len Almond;David Bunker;Joy Butler

  • The relationship between working memory, reinvestment, and heart rate variability.

    Sylvain Laborde;Sylvain Laborde;Philip Furley;Caroline Schempp

  • Systematic vs. Narrative Reviews in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Is Either Approach Superior to the Other?

    Philip Furley;Nadav Goldschmied

  • The development of a method for identifying penalty kick strategies in association football

    Benjamin Noël;Philip Furley;John van der Kamp;Matt Dicks

  • Working Memory Capacity, Visual Attention and Hazard Perception in Driving

    G. Wood;G. Wood;G. Hartley;P.A. Furley;M.R. Wilson

  • A critical review of research on executive functions in sport and exercise

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Memmert
Daniel Memmert German Sport University Cologne
Sylvain Laborde
Sylvain Laborde German Sport University Cologne
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Raôul R. D. Oudejans
Raôul R. D. Oudejans Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Mark R. Wilson
Mark R. Wilson University of Wollongong
John van der Kamp
John van der Kamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alain Ptito
Alain Ptito McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philip Furley

Recently Published Articles