World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
9408
World Ranking
5255
National Ranking
301

Damian Farrow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damian Farrow sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Damian Farrow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damian Farrow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Damian Farrow is affiliated with Victoria University in Australia and specializes in research within the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

Their research primarily addresses topics linked to Sport Psychology and Performance, Sports Performance and Training, Sports Injuries and Prevention, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Sports Analytics and Performance, Physical Education and Pedagogy, as well as Children's Physical and Motor Development.

Recent publications by Damian Farrow cover various aspects of sports science and psychology. Notable papers include:

  • "Examining the representativeness of a virtual reality environment for simulation of tennis performance" (2020, Journal of Sports Sciences)
  • "Sports Coaches' Knowledge and Beliefs About the Provision, Reception, and Evaluation of Verbal Feedback" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Defining cricket batting expertise from the perspective of elite coaches" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "Scaling sports equipment for children promotes functional movement variability" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "An analysis of in-game feedback provided by coaches in an Australian Football League competition" (2020, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy)

Damian Farrow frequently collaborates with several researchers including Tim Buszard, Machar Reid, Ian Renshaw, Robert J. Mason, and John Hattie.

Their work has been published often in the following venues:

  • Journal of Sports Sciences
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport

Throughout their career, Damian Farrow has contributed to advancing knowledge about sports coaching, performance evaluation, and movement variability in children's sports equipment scaling. These contributions reflect a multidisciplinary approach integrating psychological, physical, and educational perspectives relevant to sports science and practice.

Best Publications

  • An Integrated, Multifactorial Approach to Periodization for Optimal Performance in Individual and Team Sports.

    Iñigo Mujika;Shona Halson;Louise M. Burke;Gloria Balagué

  • Do expertise and the degree of perception-action coupling affect natural anticipatory performance?

    Damian Farrow;Bruce Abernethy

  • How do world-class cricket batsmen anticipate a bowler's intention?

    Sean Müller;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

  • Can anticipatory skills be learned through implicit video based perceptual training

    Damian Farrow;Bruce Abernethy

  • The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology

    D Farrow;W Young;Lyndell Bruce

  • The effects of fatigue on decision making and shooting skill performance in water polo players.

    Kylie A. Royal;Damian Farrow;Iñigo Mujika;Shona L. Halson

  • The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve.

    Damian Farrow;Paula Chivers;Carl Hardingham;Shane Sachse

  • Probing expert anticipation with the temporal occlusion paradigm: experimental investigations of some methodological issues.

    Damian Farrow;Bruce Abernethy;Robin C. Jackson

  • Action specificity increases anticipatory performance and the expert advantage in natural interceptive tasks.

    David L. Mann;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

  • The development of anticipation: a cross-sectional examination of the practice experiences contributing to skill in cricket batting.

    Juanita Weissensteiner;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow;Sean Müller

  • The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players

    Damian Farrow;Machar Reid

  • Developing sport expertise: Researchers and coaches put theory into practice

    Damian Farrow;Joseph Baker;Clare MacMahon

  • Scaling the Equipment and Play Area in Children’s Sport to improve Motor Skill Acquisition: A Systematic Review

    Tim Buszard;Machar Reid;Rich Masters;Damian Farrow;Damian Farrow

  • Fundamental Movement Skills Are More than Run, Throw and Catch: The Role of Stability Skills

    James R. Rudd;Lisa M. Barnett;Michael L. Butson;Damian Farrow

  • The contribution of situational probability information to anticipatory skill

    Damian Farrow;Damian Farrow;Machar Reid

  • IMPLICIT PERCEPTUAL TRAINING :HOW, WHEN AND WHY?

    Robin C. Jackson;Damian Farrow

  • Training perceptual-cognitive skills: Can sport psychology research inform military decision training?

    Paul Ward;Damian Farrow;Kevin R. Harris;A. Mark Williams

  • Fatigue in tennis: Mechanisms of fatigue and effect on performance

    Daniel J. Hornery;Damian Farrow;Inigo Mujika;Warren B. Young

  • Constraints and issues in the development of a general theory of expert perceptual-motor performance: A critique of the deliberate practice framework

    A.B. Abernethy;D. Farrow;J. T. Berry

  • Routledge Handbook of Sport Expertise

    Joseph Baker;Damian Farrow

  • Towards the Development of a Conceptual Model of Expertise in Cricket Batting: A Grounded Theory Approach

    Juanita Weissensteiner;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
Remco Polman
Remco Polman Queensland University of Technology
Joseph Baker
Joseph Baker University of Toronto
Rich S. W. Masters
Rich S. W. Masters University of Waikato
David B. Pyne
David B. Pyne University of Canberra
Lisa M. Barnett
Lisa M. Barnett Deakin University
Geert J.P. Savelsbergh
Geert J.P. Savelsbergh Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Keith Davids
Keith Davids Sheffield Hallam University
Ian Renshaw
Ian Renshaw Queensland University of Technology
Bruce Elliott
Bruce Elliott University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to various rewarding career paths, especially in the social work field. Many students choose online degrees for flexibility and accessibility as they prepare for these professions. However, it's important to understand that social work careers often have specific state-by-state education requirements.

For example, in North Carolina, aspiring social workers must meet the North Carolina minimum degree requirement for social workers, which typically involves at least a bachelor's degree in social work or a related field. Other states have their own standards; check the North Dakota education requirements for social workers or learn about the degree needed to be a social worker in Ohio. Similarly, those interested in practicing in the South Central region should be aware of the Oklahoma minimum degree requirement for social workers.

Before enrolling in any online psychology or social work program, always review your targeted state’s licensing requirements. Understanding degree pathways and accreditation ensures your education leads to professional success and eligibility for essential certifications.

Best Scientists Citing Damian Farrow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles