World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4415 4085 203 200 248 10808

Daniel Memmert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Memmert between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Memmert published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 22.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 168 publications in 2025. 199 of the 607 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 168. Peak 168 publications in 2025. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 60 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 168 publications
1999 2025

607 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Memmert: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 9
2007 5
2008 5
2009 17
2010 13
2011 6
2012 16
2013 14
2014 16
2015 23
2016 23
2017 29
2018 38
2019 21
2020 23
2021 44
2022 42
2023 60
2024 31
2025 168
Total 607
Download as CSV

Daniel Memmert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Memmert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 248 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 248
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Memmert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Memmert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel Memmert is affiliated with the German Sport University Cologne in Germany. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on psychology, medicine, and economics, econometrics, and finance. Within these, Memmert's substantial work emphasizes orthopedics and sports medicine, economics and econometrics, developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad spectrum connected to sports performance. These include sports performance and training, sports analytics and performance, sport psychology and performance, sports injuries and prevention, motivation and self-concept in sports, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and sports dynamics and biomechanics.

Memmert has contributed numerous articles throughout their career with notable recent papers, including:

  • Video assistant referees (VAR): The impact of technology on decision making in association football referees (2020), published in the Journal of Sports Sciences
  • How does spectator presence affect football? Home advantage remains in European top-class football matches played without spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • Perceptual-cognitive processes underlying creative expert performance in soccer (2020), published in Psychological Research
  • Artificial Intelligence Based Body Sensor Network Framework-Narrative Review: Proposing an End-to-End Framework using Wearable Sensors, Real-Time Location Systems and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Collection, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery in Sports and Healthcare (2021), published in Sports Medicine - Open
  • Innovative Approaches in Sports Science-Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis as a Tool to Analyze Sports-Related Twitter Communication (2020), published in Applied Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Robert Rein
  • Fabian Wunderlich
  • Dominik Raabe
  • Ashwin Phatak
  • Saumya Mehta

Memmert's research outputs have appeared regularly in a set of scholarly venues, notably:

  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
  • Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport
  • German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research

Their body of work reflects a deep engagement with the analysis, application, and advancement of knowledge in sports science, particularly focusing on performance, psychology, analytics, and injury prevention. Their publications contribute to a diverse array of academic discussions ranging from the impact of new technologies in sports to psychological and behavioral analyses in athletic contexts.

Best Publications

  • Play and practice in the development of sport‐specific creativity in team ball sports

    Daniel Memmert;Joseph Baker;Claudia Bertsch

  • The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports

    Daniel Memmert;Klaus Roth

  • The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports.

    Daniel Memmert;Daniel J. Simons;Thorsten Grimme

  • The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some Concerns and Solutions for Further Development

    Daniel Memmert;Stephen Harvey

  • The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness.

    Daniel Memmert

  • Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage.

    Christian Unkelbach;Daniel Memmert

  • A Systematic Review of Collective Tactical Behaviours in Football Using Positional Data.

    Benedict Low;Diogo Coutinho;Bruno Gonçalves;Robert Rein

  • Measurement of cognitive functions in experts and elite athletes: A meta-analytic review

    Hans‐Erik Scharfen;Daniel Memmert

  • “Which pass is better?” Novel approaches to assess passing effectiveness in elite soccer

    Robert Rein;Dominik Raabe;Daniel Memmert

  • Pay attention! A review of visual attentional expertise in sport

    Daniel Memmert

  • Can Creativity Be Improved by an Attention-Broadening Training Program? An Exploratory Study Focusing on Team Sports

    Daniel Memmert

  • "I spy with my little eye!": breadth of attention, inattentional blindness, and tactical decision making in team sports.

    Daniel Memmert;Philip Furley

  • The role of working memory in sport

    Philip Alexander Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • Creative Motor Actions As Emerging from Movement Variability.

    Dominic Orth;John van der Kamp;Daniel Memmert;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

  • Game Management, Context Effects, and Calibration: The Case of Yellow Cards in Soccer

    Christian Unkelbach;Daniel Memmert

  • Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making.

    Philip A. Furley;Daniel Memmert

  • The Impact of a Sports Vision Training Program in Youth Field Hockey Players

    Sebastian Schwab;Daniel Memmert

  • Teaching Tactical Creativity in Sport: Research and Practice

    Daniel Memmert

  • Testing of Tactical Performance in Youth Elite Soccer

    Daniel Memmert

  • Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers

    Philip Furley;Daniel Memmert

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Furley
Philip Furley German Sport University Cologne
Christian Unkelbach
Christian Unkelbach University of Cologne
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John van der Kamp
John van der Kamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Thomas Schack
Thomas Schack Bielefeld University
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Ilona Papousek
Ilona Papousek University of Graz
Andreas Fink
Andreas Fink University of Graz
Paul R. Ford
Paul R. Ford St. Mary's University
Elisabeth M. Weiss
Elisabeth M. Weiss University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens the door to many related online degrees and career pathways. One notable field is Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which shares overlapping skills with psychology, such as communication, client assessment, and behavioral understanding.

If you're interested in becoming a speech-language pathologist, it's essential to understand that requirements can differ by state. For example, you can review the New York slp certification requirements to get an idea of the process. Similarly, those considering practice in the southeast can learn about how to become a speech language pathologist in North Carolina.

The certification journey in the Midwest is also unique, as demonstrated by the steps on how to become a speech language pathologist in North Dakota. Prospective candidates in Ohio will also find specific guidelines on Ohio slp certification requirements.

A psychology background can provide a solid foundation for many health and human services professions, so consider these pathways as you plan your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Memmert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles