World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10278 9620 491 484 188 4131

Petra Jansen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Petra Jansen between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Petra Jansen published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 41 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 20 publications
2003 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Petra Jansen: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 11
2011 6
2012 10
2013 9
2014 12
2015 8
2016 12
2017 18
2018 17
2019 29
2020 13
2021 35
2022 17
2023 21
2024 21
2025 20
Total 266
Download as CSV

Petra Jansen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 188
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Petra Jansen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Petra Jansen is affiliated with the University of Regensburg in Germany, with an extensive publication record primarily in the field of psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Automotive Engineering. The focus on Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology is particularly prominent, featuring the highest numbers of their scholarly works.

Themes central to their work encompass a range of psychological topics. These include:

  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Jansen has regularly collaborated with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include Leonardo Jost, Markus Siebertz, Martina Rahe, Franziska Anna Schroter, and Philipp Hofmann. These partnerships reflect recurring joint efforts across their body of work.

Their publication history includes studies in a variety of journals, often in venues recognized within psychological and behavioral sciences. Regular publication outlets include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
  • Scientific Reports
  • Psychological Research

Representative recent papers illustrate the focus and scope of Jansen's research. These include:

  • Resistance training in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Clinical Rehabilitation
  • Aquatic therapy in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
  • Diverging implicit measurement of sense of agency using interval estimation and Libet clock, 2022, Consciousness and Cognition
  • Affective explicit and implicit attitudes towards vegetarian and vegan food consumption: The role of mindfulness, 2021, Appetite
  • What Can Affect Competition Anxiety in Athletes? The Role of Self-Compassion and Repetitive Negative Thinking, 2021, Psychological Reports

Best Publications

  • Effects of physical activity on executive function and motor performance in children with ADHD

    Susanne Ziereis;Petra Jansen

  • Different Mental Rotation Performance in Students of Music, Sport and Education.

    Stefanie Pietsch;Petra Jansen

  • Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type?

    Sarah Neuburger;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil;Claudia Quaiser-Pohl

  • Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis.

    Daniel Voyer;Petra Jansen

  • Mental rotation in female fraternal twins: Evidence for intra-uterine hormone transfer?

    Martin Heil;Michael Kavšek;Bettina Rolke;Christian Beste

  • Correlation of motor skill, mental rotation, and working memory in 3- to 6-year-old children

    Jennifer Lehmann;Claudia Quaiser-Pohl;Petra Jansen

  • Mental rotation performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults

    Corinna Titze;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil

  • Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: a study in a virtual environment.

    Petra Jansen;Andrea Schmelter;Martin Heil

  • Mental Rotation Performance in Male Soccer Players

    Petra Jansen;Jennifer Lehmann;Jessica Van Doren

  • Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests?

    P. Jansen;A. Schmelter;C. Quaiser-Pohl;S. Neuburger

  • The Relation Between Motor Development and Mental Rotation Ability in 5- to 6-Year-old Children

    Petra Jansen;Martin Heil

  • Gender differences in mental rotation across adulthood.

    Petra Jansen;Martin Heil

  • Preschoolers' mental rotation: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry

    Nicola Hahn;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil

  • A Threat in the Classroom Gender Stereotype Activation and Mental-Rotation Performance in Elementary-School Children

    Sarah Neuburger;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil;Claudia Quaiser-Pohl

  • The influence of juggling on mental rotation performance.

    P. Jansen;C. Titze;M. Heil

  • Effects of cognitive, motor, and karate training on cognitive functioning and emotional well-being of elderly people.

    Petra Jansen;Katharina Dahmen-Zimmer

  • Effects of Karate Training Versus Mindfulness Training on Emotional Well-Being and Cognitive Performance in Later Life:

    Petra Jansen;Katharina Dahmen-Zimmer;Brigitte M. Kudielka;Anja Schulz

  • Is tDCS an Adjunct Ergogenic Resource for Improving Muscular Strength and Endurance Performance? A Systematic Review.

    Sergio Machado;Petra Jansen;Victor Almeida;Jitka Veldema

  • Associations between parent-adolescent attachment relationship quality, negative life events and mental health.

    Rienke Bannink;Suzanne Broeren;Petra M. van de Looij – Jansen;Hein Raat

  • Embodied mental rotation: a special link between egocentric transformation and the bodily self.

    Sandra Kaltner;Bernhard E. Riecke;Petra Jansen

  • Mental rotation performance in soccer players and gymnasts in an object-based mental rotation task.

    Petra Jansen;Jennifer Lehmann

  • Impaired mental rotation performance in overweight children.

    Petra Jansen;Andrea Schmelter;Laura Kasten;Martin Heil

  • The influence of juggling on mental rotation performance in children

    Petra Jansen;Léonie F. Lange;Martin Heil

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Heil
Martin Heil Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Brigitte M. Kudielka
Brigitte M. Kudielka University of Regensburg
Daniel Memmert
Daniel Memmert German Sport University Cologne
Bernhard E. Riecke
Bernhard E. Riecke Simon Fraser University
Alireza Gharabaghi
Alireza Gharabaghi University of Tübingen
Jürgen Götz
Jürgen Götz University of Queensland
Marta Ghisi
Marta Ghisi University of Padua
Heidrun Stoeger
Heidrun Stoeger University of Regensburg
Sergio A.S. Machado
Sergio A.S. Machado Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in Psychology, there are a variety of online programs that open doors to meaningful career pathways. Popular routes include clinical psychology, counseling, and social work—each requiring a strong understanding of human behavior and mental processes.

For those interested in social work, the path to licensure varies by state. Before starting, it's essential to know the North Dakota social work license requirements, which outline the academic credentials and supervised experience needed to practice.

Different states have unique professional standards. Prospective social workers should review what’s needed in their region, such as how to become a social worker in Ohio or understand the requirements to be a social worker in Oklahoma. These resources detail the degrees, exams, and fieldwork required for licensure.

Oregon, for example, has its own process, so be sure to investigate how to become a social worker in Oregon. Exploring these pathways can help you decide which online psychology or social work program best fits your goals and prepares you for a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Petra Jansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles