World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6533 6142 374 359 1010 41771

Peter Bartenstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Bartenstein between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Bartenstein published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 28.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2020. 15 of the 985 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2020. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 47 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 46 publications 2016: 61 publications 2017: 60 publications 2018: 55 publications 2019: 60 publications 2020: 88 publications 2021: 82 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
1991 2025

985 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Bartenstein: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 1
1993 7
1994 4
1995 5
1996 8
1997 3
1998 14
1999 17
2000 11
2001 14
2002 11
2003 17
2004 29
2005 17
2006 24
2007 18
2008 16
2009 30
2010 47
2011 35
2012 33
2013 47
2014 36
2015 46
2016 61
2017 60
2018 55
2019 60
2020 88
2021 82
2022 36
2023 35
2024 10
2025 5
Total 985
Download as CSV

Peter Bartenstein publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bartenstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,010 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,010
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Bartenstein D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bartenstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Bartenstein is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research predominantly focuses on the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Physiology, and Oncology.

The scientist's work spans several core topics, including:

  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Among recent publications, some notable papers include:

  • "Nuclear Medicine Operations in the Times of COVID-19: Strategies, Precautions, and Experiences" (2020), published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics" (2020), published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
  • "Toward Single-Time-Point Image-Based Dosimetry of177Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy" (2023), published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Microglial Activation and Connectivity in Alzheimer Disease and Aging" (2022), published in Annals of Neurology
  • "Biodistribution and dosimetry for combined [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy using multi-isotope quantitative SPECT imaging" (2023), published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Collaborations with frequent coauthors reflect a network of active academic partnerships including:

  • Matthias Brendel (56 joint publications)
  • Leonie Beyer (32 joint publications)
  • Marcus Unterrainer (32 joint publications)
  • Nathalie L. Albert (28 joint publications)
  • Lena M. Unterrainer (24 joint publications)

Their publication output is often featured in journals such as:

  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine (41 publications)
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (9 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (7 publications)
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine (6 publications)
  • NeuroImage (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • German Multicenter Study Investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients.

    Kambiz Rahbar;Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar;Clemens Kratochwil;Uwe Haberkorn

  • Correlation between dopamine D(2) receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving.

    Andreas Heinz;Thomas Siessmeier;Jana Wrase;Derik Hermann

  • Cerebral amyloid-β PET with florbetaben (18F) in patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls: a multicentre phase 2 diagnostic study

    Henryk Barthel;Hermann-Josef Gertz;Stefan Dresel;Oliver Peters

  • Dominance for Vestibular Cortical Function in the Non-dominant Hemisphere

    M. Dieterich;S. Bense;S. Lutz;A. Drzezga

  • EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [(18)F]FDG : version 2

    Andrea Varrone;Susanne Asenbaum;Thierry Vander Borght;Jan Booij

  • Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

    Thomas Brandt;Peter Bartenstein;Anika Janek;Marianne Dieterich

  • Loss of TREM2 function increases amyloid seeding but reduces plaque-associated ApoE.

    Samira Parhizkar;Thomas Arzberger;Matthias Brendel;Gernot Kleinberger

  • Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: A positron emission tomography correlation analysis

    Thomas R. Tölle;Tanja Kaufmann;Thomas Siessmeier;Stefan Lautenbacher

  • Overexpression of Glut‐1 and increased glucose metabolism in tumors are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

    Martin Kunkel;Torsten E. Reichert M.D.;Peter Benz;Hans-Anton Lehr M.D.

  • Nodal/Activin Signaling Drives Self-Renewal and Tumorigenicity of Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells and Provides a Target for Combined Drug Therapy

    Enza Lonardo;Patrick C. Hermann;Maria Theresa Mueller;Stephan Huber

  • Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison.

    Christian la Fougère;Andreas Zwergal;Axel Rominger;Stefan Förster

  • Combined targeted treatment to eliminate tumorigenic cancer stem cells in human pancreatic cancer.

    Maria Theresa Mueller;Patrick C. Hermann;Patrick C. Hermann;Juliane Witthauer;Belen Rubio-Viqueira

  • 18F-FDG PET/CT Identifies Patients at Risk for Future Vascular Events in an Otherwise Asymptomatic Cohort with Neoplastic Disease

    Axel Rominger;Tobias Saam;Sarah Wolpers;Clemens C. Cyran

  • A positron emission tomographic study of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease: enhanced movement-related activity of motor-association cortex and decreased motor cortex resting activity.

    Andrés O. Ceballos-Baumann;Henning Boecker;Peter Bartenstein;Isabella von Falkenhayn

  • Correlation of alcohol craving with striatal dopamine synthesis capacity and D2/3 receptor availability: a combined [18F]DOPA and [18F]DMFP PET study in detoxified alcoholic patients.

    Andreas Heinz;Thomas Siessmeier;Jana Wrase;Hans Georg Buchholz

  • Focal metabolic activation in the predominant left auditory cortex in patients suffering from tinnitus: a PET study with [18F]deoxyglucose.

    Wolfgang Arnold;Peter Bartenstein;Elmar Oestreicher;Wolfgang Römer

  • Central activation by histamine-induced itch: analogies to pain processing: a correlational analysis of O-15 H2O positron emission tomography studies.

    Alexander Drzezga;Ulf Darsow;Rolf-Detlef Treede;Hartwig Siebner

  • Regional myocardial sympathetic dysinnervation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. An analysis using 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy.

    T Wichter;G Hindricks;H Lerch;P Bartenstein

  • Nasal high flow clears anatomical dead space in upper airway models

    Winfried Möller;Gülnaz Celik;Sheng Feng;Peter Bartenstein

  • Impact of combined selective internal radiation therapy and sorafenib on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Jens Ricke;Heinz Josef Klümpen;Holger Amthauer;Irene Bargellini

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Brendel
Matthias Brendel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Paul Cumming
Paul Cumming Queensland University of Technology
Christian Haass
Christian Haass Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Claus Belka
Claus Belka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Marianne Dieterich
Marianne Dieterich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Günter U. Höglinger
Günter U. Höglinger Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Henryk Barthel
Henryk Barthel Leipzig University
Christian G. Stief
Christian G. Stief Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas Brandt
Thomas Brandt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career doesn’t just mean attending traditional medical school. There are many other high-demand roles and alternative pathways available. For example, if you want to enter nursing quickly and already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses. These fast-track programs let you transition into advanced nursing without starting from scratch.

Some nursing programs offer more accessible admission requirements, making them ideal if you need a less competitive option. You can check out nursing schools with high acceptance rates to increase your chances of enrollment.

Not all healthcare careers require clinical training. If you’d prefer to work on the administrative side, you might be interested in online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa—an excellent choice for those seeking in-demand remote healthcare positions.

Lastly, advancing your nursing credentials could be more straightforward than you think. Some bridge programs, such as lpn to rn programs without teas test, let you progress without the hurdle of extra entrance exams. Explore these pathways to find the right fit for your healthcare career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Bartenstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles