World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
31502
World Ranking
10107
National Ranking
557

Ken Herrmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Herrmann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 609 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ken Herrmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Herrmann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken Herrmann is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. Their research spans primarily the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology, and Cancer Research.

Herrmann's major topics of work reflect this focus and include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances, Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis, and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Frequent publication venues where Herrmann has contributed numerous articles include:

  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancers

Notable recent papers by Herrmann feature significant topics in oncology and nuclear medicine such as:

  • Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET, 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection, 2021, JAMA Oncology
  • Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities, 2022, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0, 2023, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Herrmann collaborates frequently with a network of scholars with whom they have multiple coauthored publications. Key collaborators include Wolfgang P. Fendler, Lale Umutlu, Christoph Rischpler, Boris Hadaschik, and Matthias Eiber.

Best Publications

  • Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

    Oliver Sartor;Johann de Bono;Kim N Chi;Karim Fizazi

  • PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

    Florian Lordick;Katja Ott;Bernd-Joachim Krause;Wolfgang A Weber

  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0.

    Wolfgang P. Fendler;Wolfgang P. Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Mohsen Beheshti;Jamshed Bomanji

  • Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial

    Wolfgang P Fendler;Wolfgang P Fendler;Jeremie Calais;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Robert R Flavell

  • Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

    Katja Ott;Wolfgang A. Weber;Florian Lordick;Karen Becker

  • Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT

    Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Ken Herrmann;Jeremie Calais;Boris Hadaschik

  • The detection rate of [11C]Choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

    B. J. Krause;M. Souvatzoglou;M. Tuncel;K. Herrmann

  • Economic Evaluation of PET and PET/CT in Oncology: Evidence and Methodologic Approaches

    Andreas K. Buck;Ken Herrmann;Tom Stargardt;Tobias Dechow

  • EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT).

    Clemens Kratochwil;Wolfgang Peter Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Richard Baum

  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning

    Jeremie Calais;Johannes Czernin;Minsong Cao;Amar U. Kishan

  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET Imaging in Neuroendocrine Tumors.

    Thomas A. Hope;Thomas A. Hope;Emily K. Bergsland;Murat Fani Bozkurt;Michael Graham

  • 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Disease in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy

    Heiko Schöder;Ken Herrmann;Mithat Gönen;Hedvig Hricak

  • First-in-Human Experience of CXCR4-Directed Endoradiotherapy with 177Lu- and 90Y-Labeled Pentixather in Advanced-Stage Multiple Myeloma with Extensive Intra- and Extramedullary Disease

    Ken Herrmann;Margret Schottelius;Constantin Lapa;Theresa Osl

  • E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET

    Francesco Ceci;Daniela E. Oprea-Lager;Louise Emmett;Judit A. Adam

  • PET/CT with 11 C-choline for evaluation of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: meta-analysis and critical review of available data

    Stefano Fanti;Silvia Minozzi;Paolo Castellucci;Sara Balduzzi

  • 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT.

    Christina Bluemel;Markus Krebs;Bülent Polat;Fränze Linke

  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron-Emission Tomography in Men with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

    Wolfgang P. Fendler;Manuel Weber;Amir Iravani;Michael S. Hofman

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial

    Thomas A Hope;Thomas A Hope;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Wesley Robert Armstrong;Roxanna Juarez

  • (18)F-FDG PET-guided salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the MUNICON II trial.

    Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde;Ken Herrmann;Tibor Schuster;Hans Geinitz

  • Comparison of Integrin αvβ3 Expression and Glucose Metabolism in Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Cancer Patients: A PET Study Using 18F-Galacto-RGD and 18F-FDG

    Ambros J. Beer;Sylvie Lorenzen;Stephan Metz;Ken Herrmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Czernin
Johannes Czernin University of California, Los Angeles
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Gerald Antoch
Gerald Antoch Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Hans-Jürgen Wester Technical University of Munich
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
Stefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti University of Bologna
Tibor Schuster
Tibor Schuster McGill University
Christian Peschel
Christian Peschel Technical University of Munich
Florian Lordick
Florian Lordick Leipzig University
Jürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA often opens doors to a variety of healthcare careers beyond becoming a physician. For those seeking practical entry points, some students consider programs like the easiest nursing schools to get into, which offer more accessible admission requirements and a faster pathway to working in patient care.

If you prefer administrative or technical roles, the best online medical billing and coding schools provide flexible learning so you can earn certification and begin your career in medical records management.

Some nursing programs support alternative admissions for motivated learners. For instance, you may find a nursing school without teas test requirements, reducing barriers for applicants and streamlining the enrollment process.

Interested in healthcare leadership? Consider earning an online healthcare management degree to qualify for management roles within hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations. These options give students a wide array of alternative pathways in the ever-growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Ken Herrmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles