World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
13679
World Ranking
2337
National Ranking
938

Julie K. Lundquist publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie K. Lundquist sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 280 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Julie K. Lundquist D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie K. Lundquist sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie K. Lundquist is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields with a primary focus on environmental science, engineering, and earth and planetary sciences. These main fields are further refined through subfields that include atmospheric science, aerospace engineering, environmental engineering, global and planetary change, and computational mechanics.

The core topics within their research include meteorological phenomena and simulations, wind and air flow studies, wind energy research and development, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, climate variability and models, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, and fluid dynamics and turbulent flows.

Lundquist's publication record covers a variety of venues, with a notable presence in the following:

  • Wind energy science
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Their recent papers include:

  • Continued results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm - Part 2, 2020, Wind energy science
  • Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling, 2022, Joule
  • Turbulent kinetic energy over large offshore wind farms observed and simulated by the mesoscale model WRF (3.8.1), 2020, Geoscientific model development
  • The effect of wind direction shear on turbine performance in a wind farm in central Iowa, 2020, Wind energy science
  • The Importance of Weather and Climate to Energy Systems: A Workshop on Next Generation Challenges in Energy-Climate Modeling, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent collaborators contributing to joint work with Lundquist are:

  • Miguel Sanchez Gomez
  • Daniel Zalkind
  • Nicola Bodini
  • Patrick Moriarty
  • Raghavendra Krishnamurthy

Their body of work addresses critical challenges related to energy systems, climate modeling, and the physical dynamics of wind energy through both observational and simulation-based approaches. This research contributes to a multidisciplinary understanding of atmospheric processes relevant to renewable energy development and environmental impacts.

Best Publications

  • Grand challenges in the science of wind energy

    Paul Veers;Katherine Dykes;Eric Lantz;Stephan Barth

  • An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer

    Robert J. Beare;Malcolm K. Macvean;Albert A.M. Holtslag;Joan Cuxart

  • CASES-99: A Comprehensive Investigation of the Stable Nocturnal Boundary Layer

    Gregory S. Poulos;William Blumen;David C. Fritts;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Local and mesoscale impacts of wind farms as parameterized in a mesoscale NWP model

    Anna C. Fitch;Joseph B. Olson;Julie K. Lundquist;Jimy Dudhia

  • Nocturnal Low-Level Jet Characteristics Over Kansas During Cases-99

    R.M. Banta;R. K. Newsom;J. K. Lundquist;Y. L. Pichugina

  • Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine power collection

    Sonia Wharton;Julie K Lundquist

  • Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development

    J. K. Lundquist;J. K. Lundquist;K. K. DuVivier;D. Kaffine;J. M. Tomaszewski

  • Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 1

    Paul Fleming;Jennifer King;Katherine Dykes;Eric Simley

  • Southward shift of the global wind energy resource under high carbon dioxide emissions

    Kristopher B. Karnauskas;Kristopher B. Karnauskas;Julie K. Lundquist;Lei Zhang

  • Implementation of a Nonlinear Subfilter Turbulence Stress Model for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Advanced Research WRF Model

    J. D. Mirocha;J. K. Lundquist;B. Kosović

  • Quantifying Wind Turbine Wake Characteristics from Scanning Remote Sensor Data

    Matthew L. Aitken;Robert M. Banta;Yelena L. Pichugina;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Crop Wind Energy Experiment (CWEX): Observations of Surface-Layer, Boundary Layer, and Mesoscale Interactions with a Wind Farm

    Daniel A. Rajewski;Eugene S. Takle;Julie K. Lundquist;Steven Oncley

  • Mesoscale Influences of Wind Farms throughout a Diurnal Cycle

    Anna C. Fitch;Julie K. Lundquist;Joseph B. Olson

  • Assessing atmospheric stability and its impacts on rotor-disk wind characteristics at an onshore wind farm

    Sonia Wharton;Julie K. Lundquist;Julie K. Lundquist

  • The Perdigão: Peering into Microscale Details of Mountain Winds

    H. J. S. Fernando;J. Mann;J. M. L. M. Palma;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Development of a Coupled Groundwater–Atmosphere Model

    Reed M. Maxwell;Julie K. Lundquist;Jeffrey D. Mirocha;Steven G. Smith

  • Implementation of a generalized actuator disk wind turbine model into the weather research and forecasting model for large-eddy simulation applications

    J. D. Mirocha;B. Kosovic;M. L. Aitken;J. K. Lundquist

  • An Immersed Boundary Method for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model

    Katherine A. Lundquist;Fotini Katopodes Chow;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling

    Unknown

  • Improving Wind Energy Forecasting through Numerical Weather Prediction Model Development

    Joseph B. Olson;Jaymes S. Kenyon;Irina Djalalova;Laura Bianco

  • Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics

    J. K. Lundquist;J. K. Lundquist;M. J. Churchfield;S. Lee;A. Clifton

  • An Immersed Boundary Method Enabling Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow over Complex Terrain in the WRF Model

    Katherine A. Lundquist;Fotini Katopodes Chow;Julie K. Lundquist

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Wilczak
James M. Wilczak National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Patrick Moriarty
Patrick Moriarty National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Larry K. Berg
Larry K. Berg Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Robert M. Banta
Robert M. Banta National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Eugene S. Takle
Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University
Daniel E. Wolfe
Daniel E. Wolfe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
William J. Shaw
William J. Shaw Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
John H. Prueger
John H. Prueger Agricultural Research Service
Matthew J. Churchfield
Matthew J. Churchfield National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Stefan Emeis
Stefan Emeis Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to interdisciplinary careers that often intersect with technology, public administration, sociology, and education. For example, obtaining a gis degree can enhance your ability to analyze environmental data spatially, a critical skill in conservation and urban planning roles.

In addition to technical expertise, leadership and policy skills are essential for driving environmental initiatives. Online programs such as the 1 year mpa programs equip students with public administration knowledge, preparing them for management positions in governmental and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Understanding the human and social dimensions of environmental issues is equally important. Scholars often pursue a bachelors degree in sociology online to explore societal impacts and behaviors related to environmental change.

For those interested in education and leadership roles without the intensive research requirements, an edd without dissertation offers a practical path to advance educational practices in environmental education settings.

Best Scientists Citing Julie K. Lundquist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles