World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
9056
World Ranking
5006
National Ranking
1840

Eugene S. Takle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene S. Takle sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 181 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Eugene S. Takle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene S. Takle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene S. Takle is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States and works primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Engineering, and Environmental Science. Their research focuses on subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Aerospace Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Earth-Surface Processes.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, particularly Wind Energy Research and Development, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Aeolian Processes and Effects, Climate Change and Permafrost, as well as Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows.

Takle has contributed to a number of academic publications, including:

  • Understanding Physical Processes Represented by the Monin-Obukhov Bulk Formula for Momentum Transfer (2020) in Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • Iowa's agriculture is losing its Goldilocks climate (2020) in Physics Today
  • Observations Show That Wind Farms Substantially Modify the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Thermal Stratification Transition in the Early Evening (2020) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Windbreak Practices (2021) in ASSA, CSSA and SSSA
  • Wind Energy Potential at Elevated Hub Heights in the US Midwest Region (2021) in Journal of Energy Engineering

Frequent co-authors in Takle's research include D. A. Rajewski, Bin Cai, Masrur Mahedi, Halil Ceylan, and Sunghwan Kim. These collaborative efforts have appeared in various scientific outlets.

The scientist's articles have been published in several venues such as Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Physics Today, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Energy Engineering, and Transportation Geotechnics, reflecting a broad engagement with multiple relevant journals in the environmental and engineering sciences.

Best Publications

  • The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results

    Linda O. Mearns;Ray Arritt;Sébastien Biner;Melissa S. Bukovsky

  • Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation

    Charles L. Walthall;Christoper J. Anderson;Lance H. Baumgard;Eugene Takle

  • Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States

    S. C. Pryor;R. J. Barthelmie;D. T. Young;Eugene S. Takle

  • Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I

    Donald J. Wuebbles;David W. Fahey;Kathy A. Hibbard;Jeff R. Arnold

  • Hydrological responses to dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output

    Robert L. Wilby;Robert L. Wilby;Lauren E. Hay;William J. Gutowski;Raymond W. Arritt

  • Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: A regional climate model perspective

    Manoj K. Jha;Zaitao Pan;Zaitao Pan;Eugene S. Takle;Roy R. Gu

  • Note on the Use of Weibull Statistics to Characterize Wind-Speed Data

    Eugene S. Takle;J. M. Brown

  • Altered hydrologic feedback in a warming climate introduces a “warming hole”

    Zaitao Pan;Raymond W. Arritt;Eugene S. Takle;William J. Gutowski

  • Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations

    Lauren E. Hay;Martyn P. Clark;Robert L. Wilby;William J. Gutowski Jr.

  • Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS): Description and initial results

    Eugene S. Takle;William J. Gutowski;Raymond W. Arritt;Zaitao Pan

  • Climate change impacts on mycotoxin risks in US maize

    F. Wu;D. Bhatnagar;T. Bui-Klimke;I. Carbone

  • Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)

    L. O. Mearns;Steve Sain;Lai-Yung R. Leung;M. S. Bukovsky

  • Crop Wind Energy Experiment (CWEX): Observations of Surface-Layer, Boundary Layer, and Mesoscale Interactions with a Wind Farm

    Daniel A. Rajewski;Eugene S. Takle;Julie K. Lundquist;Steven Oncley

  • A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts

    Hao Wang;Eugene S. Takle

  • Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations

    Z. Pan;J. H. Christensen;R. W. Arritt;W. J. Gutowski

  • Influence of high-frequency ambient pressure pumping on carbon dioxide efflux from soil

    Eugene S. Takle;William J. Massman;James R. Brandle;R. A. Schmidt

  • Temporal–Spatial Scales of Observed and Simulated Precipitation in Central U.S. Climate

    William J. Gutowski;Steven G. Decker;Rodney A. Donavon;Zaitao Pan

  • SHELTERBELTS AND WINDBREAKS: Mathematical Modeling and Computer Simulations of Turbulent Flows

    Hao Wang;Eugene S Takle;Jinmei Shen

  • On the Potential Impact of Irrigated Areas in North America on Summer Rainfall Caused by Large-Scale Systems.

    Moti Segal;Zaitao Pan;R. W. Turner;Eugene S. Takle

  • Boundary-layer flow and turbulence near porous obstacles

    Hao Wang;Eugene S. Takle

  • Reply to “Comments on ‘The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results'”

    Linda O. Mearns;Melissa S. Bukovsky;Ruby Leung;Yun Qian

  • Impacts of Climate Change on Stream Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: A Regional Climate Model Perspective, The

    Manoj Jha;Zaitao Pan;Eugene Takle;Roy Gu

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Gutowski
William J. Gutowski Iowa State University
Raymond W. Arritt
Raymond W. Arritt Iowa State University
Julie K. Lundquist
Julie K. Lundquist University of Colorado Boulder
John O. Roads
John O. Roads University of California, San Diego
John H. Prueger
John H. Prueger Agricultural Research Service
Tsing-Chang Chen
Tsing-Chang Chen Iowa State University
William A. Gallus
William A. Gallus Iowa State University
Daniel Caya
Daniel Caya University of Quebec at Montreal
Linda O. Mearns
Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research
Lisa C. Sloan
Lisa C. Sloan University of California, Santa Cruz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences or related fields, exploring a variety of online degree options can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals seek advanced credentials like doctoral degrees but are concerned about balancing studies with work and life. Online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements offer a flexible alternative, allowing students to achieve their academic goals without the extended commitment of a dissertation.

Additionally, educators aiming to expand their expertise often consider enrolling in an eds to edd bridge program. These programs provide a streamlined path for those holding a Doctor of Education (EdS) degree to advance to an EdD, enhancing leadership opportunities within environmental education or policy roles.

For social work professionals interested in environmental justice and community health, online dsw programs in social work provide specialized training that complements environmental sciences knowledge. These programs emphasize applied skills for addressing complex social and environmental issues.

Students seeking affordable and flexible options might explore a cheap online general studies degree to establish a strong interdisciplinary foundation. This can be a stepping stone towards specialized environmental roles or further study. Leveraging these varied degree options can help shape meaningful careers at the intersection of environment, policy, and social impact.

Learn more about these opportunities by visiting online doctoral programs without dissertation, the eds to edd bridge program, online dsw programs in social work, and cheap online general studies degree.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene S. Takle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles