World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
12353
World Ranking
7901
National Ranking
356

Daniel Caya publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Caya sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 86 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel Caya D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Caya sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Caya is affiliated with the University of Quebec at Montreal in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on several interconnected fields within environmental sciences, earth sciences, and biological sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within those areas, Daniel Caya has explored subfields including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Their research topics are centered around issues such as:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

Daniel Caya has published in the journal Climatic Change. One of their recent papers is titled Remaining error sources in bias-corrected climate model outputs, published in 2020 in Climatic Change. This paper has received 37 citations.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Jie Chen
  • François Brissette

Daniel Caya's research contributes to the understanding of climate variability, improving climate model accuracy, and analyzing the impacts of changing climatic conditions on agricultural systems.

Best Publications

  • Regional climate projections

    J. H. Christensen;B. Hewitson;A. Busuioc;A. Chen

  • The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results

    Linda O. Mearns;Ray Arritt;Sébastien Biner;Melissa S. Bukovsky

  • A Semi-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian Regional Climate Model: The Canadian RCM

    Daniel Caya;René Laprise

  • Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment

    B. Denis;R. Laprise;D. Caya;J. Côté

  • Climate and Climate Change over North America as Simulated by the Canadian RCM

    David A. Plummer;D. Caya;A. Frigon;H. Côté

  • Assessment of future change in intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves for Southern Quebec using the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM)

    Alain Mailhot;Sophie Duchesne;Daniel Caya;Guillaume Talbot

  • Challenging some tenets of Regional Climate Modelling

    R. Laprise;R. de Elía;D. Caya;S. Biner

  • Modelling the sea ice-ocean seasonal cycle in Hudson Bay, Foxe Basin and Hudson Strait, Canada

    F. J. Saucier;S. Senneville;S. Prinsenberg;F. Roy

  • Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS): Description and initial results

    Eugene S. Takle;William J. Gutowski;Raymond W. Arritt;Zaitao Pan

  • Evaluation of the Hydrological Cycle over the Mississippi River Basin as Simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM)

    Biljana Music;Daniel Caya

  • Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)

    L. O. Mearns;Steve Sain;Lai-Yung R. Leung;M. S. Bukovsky

  • On the need for bias correction in regional climate scenarios to assess climate change impacts on river runoff

    Markus Muerth;B. Gauvin St-Denis;S. Ricard;J. A. Velázquez

  • Sensitivity of a regional climate model to the resolution of the lateral boundary conditions

    B. Denis;R. Laprise;D. Caya

  • Climate and climate change in western canada as simulated by the Canadian regional climate model

    Rene Laprise;Daniel Caya;Michel Giguere;Guy Bergeron

  • Northern Lake Impacts on Local Seasonal Climate

    Z. Long;W. Perrie;J. Gyakum;D. Caya

  • An ensemble approach to assess hydrological models' contribution to uncertainties in the analysis of climate change impact on water resources

    J. A. Velázquez;J. Schmid;S. Ricard;Markus Muerth

  • Investigation of regional climate models' internal variability with a ten-member ensemble of 10-year simulations over a large domain

    Philippe Lucas-Picher;Philippe Lucas-Picher;Daniel Caya;Ramón de Elía;René Laprise

  • Internal variability of RCM simulations over an annual cycle

    D. Caya;S. Biner

  • Future changes in intense precipitation over Canada assessed from multi-model NARCCAP ensemble simulations

    Alain Mailhot;Ian Beauregard;Guillaume Talbot;Daniel Caya

  • Current and perturbed climate as simulated by the second-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM-II) over northwestern North America

    R. Laprise;D. Caya;A. Frigon;D. Paquin

  • Reply to “Comments on ‘The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results'”

    Linda O. Mearns;Melissa S. Bukovsky;Ruby Leung;Yun Qian

Frequent Co-Authors

René Laprise
René Laprise University of Quebec at Montreal
Raymond W. Arritt
Raymond W. Arritt Iowa State University
William J. Gutowski
William J. Gutowski Iowa State University
Linda O. Mearns
Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research
Lisa C. Sloan
Lisa C. Sloan University of California, Santa Cruz
Eugene S. Takle
Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University
Laxmi Sushama
Laxmi Sushama McGill University
John O. Roads
John O. Roads University of California, San Diego
François Brissette
François Brissette École de Technologie Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider programs that offer flexibility and affordability, such as a online eds to edd programs, which provide pathways to advanced education leadership roles in environmental policy and education sectors.

Social work intersects with environmental issues in areas like community health and sustainability. Students may benefit from fully funded options, including fully funded dsw programs online, which prepare graduates for impactful careers supporting vulnerable populations affected by environmental change.

For those seeking a broad foundational education, a cheap online general studies degree offers an affordable way to develop critical skills in various disciplines, including science and public policy, which are valuable in many environmental careers.

Furthermore, students new to higher education might explore the easiest bachelor degree options online to build confidence and transferable skills before specializing. This approach supports a smooth transition into more technical or research-focused environmental science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Caya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles