World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
8557
World Ranking
6853
National Ranking
147

Pierre Jannin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Jannin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 255 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pierre Jannin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Jannin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre Jannin is affiliated with the University of Rennes in France. Their research spans medicine with a focus on several subfields including surgery, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, health informatics, and artificial intelligence. The range of topics covered in their work includes surgical simulation and training, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, neurological disorders and treatments, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and simulation-based education in healthcare.

The scientist has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include the International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, arXiv (Cornell University), Surgical Endoscopy, Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research, and the European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Pierre Jannin include:

  • "Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation," 2024, Nature Methods
  • "Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation," 2024, Nature Methods
  • "Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery," 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • "Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement," 2021, European Urology Focus

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pierre Jannin include Arnaud Huaulmé, John S. H. Baxter, Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, and Annika Reinke.

Best Publications

  • Surgical data science for next-generation interventions.

    Lena Maier-Hein;Swaroop S. Vedula;Stefanie Speidel;Nassir Navab;Nassir Navab

  • Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

    Lena Maier-Hein;Matthias Eisenmann;Annika Reinke;Sinan Onogur

  • Surgical Data Science - from Concepts toward Clinical Translation

    Lena Maier-Hein;Lena Maier-Hein;Matthias Eisenmann;Duygu Sarikaya;Duygu Sarikaya;Keno März

  • Surgical process modelling: a review

    Florent Lalys;Florent Lalys;Florent Lalys;Pierre Jannin;Pierre Jannin

  • Virtual Reality Simulation in Nontechnical Skills Training for Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.

    Marie-Stéphanie Bracq;Estelle Michinov;Pierre Jannin

  • Vision-based and marker-less surgical tool detection and tracking: a review of the literature

    David Bouget;Max Allan;Danail Stoyanov;Pierre Jannin

  • Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy

    P. Jannin;J.M. Fitzpatrick;D.J. Hawkes;X. Pennec

  • Surgical data science: Enabling next-generation surgery

    Lena Maier-Hein;S. Swaroop Vedula;Stefanie Speidel;Nassir Navab;Nassir Navab

  • The state of the art of visualization in mixed reality image guided surgery.

    Marta Kersten-Oertel;Pierre Jannin;D. Louis Collins

  • Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models.

    Thomas Neumuth;Pierre Jannin;Pierre Jannin;Pierre Jannin;Gero Strauss;Juergen Meixensberger

  • Automatic data-driven real-time segmentation and recognition of surgical workflow.

    Olga Dergachyova;David Bouget;David Bouget;Arnaud Huaulmé;Arnaud Huaulmé;Arnaud Huaulmé;Xavier Morandi;Xavier Morandi

  • A Framework for the Recognition of High-Level Surgical Tasks From Video Images for Cataract Surgeries

    F. Lalys;L. Riffaud;D. Bouget;P. Jannin

  • Comparative validation of single-shot optical techniques for laparoscopic 3-D surface reconstruction.

    L. Maier-Hein;A. Groch;A. Bartoli;S. Bodenstedt

  • Detecting Surgical Tools by Modelling Local Appearance and Global Shape

    David Bouget;Rodrigo Benenson;Mohamed Omran;Laurent Riffaud

  • Unsupervised Trajectory Segmentation for Surgical Gesture Recognition in Robotic Training

    Fabien Despinoy;David Bouget;Germain Forestier;Cedric Penet

  • BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges.

    Lena Maier-Hein;Annika Reinke;Michal Kozubek;Anne L. Martel

  • Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery.

    Pierre Jannin;Xavier Morandi

  • Integration of sulcal and functional information for multimodal neuronavigation.

    Pierre Jannin;Xavier Morandi;Oliver J. Fleig;Elisabeth Le Rumeur

  • Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models.

    Thomas Neumuth;Pierre Jannin;Pierre Jannin;Juliane Schlomberg;Jürgen Meixensberger

  • Learning procedural skills with a virtual reality simulator: An acceptability study.

    Marie-Stéphanie Bracq;Estelle Michinov;Bruno Arnaldi;Benoît Caillaud

  • DVV: A Taxonomy for Mixed Reality Visualization in Image Guided Surgery

    M. Kersten-Oertel;P. Jannin;D. L. Collins

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017

    Maxime Descoteaux;Lena Maier-Hein;Alfred Franz;Pierre Jannin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Christophe Grova
Christophe Grova Concordia University
Danail Stoyanov
Danail Stoyanov University College London
Stefanie Speidel
Stefanie Speidel National Center for Tumor Diseases
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marc Vérin
Marc Vérin University of Orléans
Bennett A. Landman
Bennett A. Landman Vanderbilt University
Habib Benali
Habib Benali Concordia University
Tal Arbel
Tal Arbel McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens pathways for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. Many learners seek the cheapest online colleges to lower tuition costs while gaining essential skills. Affordability is a key concern, but students should also factor in accreditation and curriculum quality.

If you are interested in technical fields, online engineering programs offer flexibility and a range of specializations that often overlap with computer science disciplines. These programs can prepare you for careers in various industries, from software to hardware.

For professionals aiming for leadership roles, pursuing executive mba online programs can complement a technical background, equipping you with advanced business and management skills valuable in tech-driven organizations.

Additionally, those interested in the information management side of tech may consider the cheapest mlis degree online. This degree can lead to roles in digital archiving, information systems, or data management.

With a variety of affordable online degree options, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to match your career goals in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Jannin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles