World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
8820
World Ranking
5930
National Ranking
138

Elena De Momi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena De Momi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 324 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elena De Momi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena De Momi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elena De Momi is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of engineering, medicine, and computer science. Their research spans multiple subfields, including biomedical engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, surgery, control and systems engineering, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's work focuses on a range of topics primarily related to robotics and medical technologies. Main research areas include:

  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology

Among recent publications, several papers stand out for addressing autonomous systems and minimally invasive surgery through automation and machine learning approaches:

  • "Autonomy in Surgical Robotics," 2020, Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • "Toward Teaching by Demonstration for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
  • "Improved recurrent neural network-based manipulator control with remote center of motion constraints: Experimental results," 2020, Neural Networks
  • "Deep Neural Network Approach in Robot Tool Dynamics Identification for Bilateral Teleoperation," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "An Incremental Learning Framework for Human-Like Redundancy Optimization of Anthropomorphic Manipulators," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Elena De Momi include:

  • Arash Ajoudani
  • Giancarlo Ferrigno
  • Sara Moccia
  • Aldo Marzullo
  • Benoît Rosa

Publications by Elena De Momi are commonly found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

The body of work presents a significant integration of engineering principles with medical applications, emphasizing robotic assistance, learning algorithms, and human-robot interaction in surgical and rehabilitative contexts.

Best Publications

  • Blood vessel segmentation algorithms — Review of methods, datasets and evaluation metrics

    Sara Moccia;Sara Moccia;Elena De Momi;Sara El Hadji;Leonardo S. Mattos

  • Haptics in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Challenges and Benefits

    Nima Enayati;Elena De Momi;Giancarlo Ferrigno

  • Improved Human–Robot Collaborative Control of Redundant Robot for Teleoperated Minimally Invasive Surgery

    Hang Su;Chenguang Yang;Giancarlo Ferrigno;Elena De Momi

  • Autonomy in Surgical Robotics

    Aleks Attanasio;Bruno Scaglioni;Elena De Momi;Paolo Fiorini

  • Improved recurrent neural network-based manipulator control with remote center of motion constraints: Experimental results.

    Hang Su;Yingbai Hu;Hamid Reza Karimi;Alois C. Knoll

  • Toward Teaching by Demonstration for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery

    Hang Su;Andrea Mariani;Salih Ertug Ovur;Arianna Menciassi

  • Validation of FreeSurfer-Estimated Brain Cortical Thickness: Comparison with Histologic Measurements

    Francesco Cardinale;Giuseppa Chinnici;Manuela Bramerio;Roberto Mai

  • Deep Neural Network Approach in Robot Tool Dynamics Identification for Bilateral Teleoperation

    Hang Su;Wen Qi;Chenguang Yang;Juan Sandoval

  • Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review.

    Alice Segato;Aldo Marzullo;Francesco Calimeri;Elena De Momi

  • Enhanced real-time pose estimation for closed-loop robotic manipulation of magnetically actuated capsule endoscopes:

    Addisu Z Taddese;Piotr R Slawinski;Marco Pirotta;Elena De Momi

  • An Incremental Learning Framework for Human-like Redundancy Optimization of Anthropomorphic Manipulators

    Hang Su;Wen Qi;Yingbai Hu;Hamid Reza Karimi

  • Finger kinematic modeling and real-time hand motion estimation.

    P. Cerveri;E. De Momi;N. Lopomo;G. Baud-Bovy

  • Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

    Alfonso Manzotti;Pietro Cerveri;Elena De Momi;Chris Pullen

  • Review of Robotic Technology for Stereotactic Neurosurgery

    Carlos Faria;Wolfram Erlhagen;Manuel Rito;Elena De Momi

  • A new tool for touch-free patient registration for robot-assisted intracranial surgery: application accuracy from a phantom study and a retrospective surgical series.

    Francesco Cardinale;Michele Rizzi;Piergiorgio d’Orio;Giuseppe Casaceli

  • Deep Learning Based Robotic Tool Detection and Articulation Estimation With Spatio-Temporal Layers

    Emanuele Colleoni;Sara Moccia;Xiaofei Du;Elena De Momi

  • A Fast and Robust Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone.

    Wen Qi;Hang Su;Chenguang Yang;Giancarlo Ferrigno

  • A Quaternion-Based Unscented Kalman Filter for Robust Optical/Inertial Motion Tracking in Computer-Assisted Surgery

    Nima Enayati;Elena De Momi;Giancarlo Ferrigno

  • Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning.

    E. De Momi;J. Chapuis;I. Pappas;G. Ferrigno

  • Deep Neural Network Approach in EMG-Based Force Estimation for Human–Robot Interaction

    Hang Su;Wen Qi;Zhijun Li;Ziyang Chen

  • Unscented Kalman Filter Based Sensor Fusion for Robust Optical and Electromagnetic Tracking in Surgical Navigation

    A. Vaccarella;E. De Momi;A. Enquobahrie;G. Ferrigno

Frequent Co-Authors

Giancarlo Ferrigno
Giancarlo Ferrigno Polytechnic University of Milan
Arash Ajoudani
Arash Ajoudani Italian Institute of Technology
Francesco Cardinale
Francesco Cardinale University of Parma
Alois Knoll
Alois Knoll Technical University of Munich
Daniele Dini
Daniele Dini Imperial College London
Wansoo Kim
Wansoo Kim Italian Institute of Technology
Pietro Valdastri
Pietro Valdastri University of Leeds
Danail Stoyanov
Danail Stoyanov University College London
Paolo Fiorini
Paolo Fiorini University of Verona
Domenico Prattichizzo
Domenico Prattichizzo University of Siena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a broad range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are now considering an accelerated computer science degree, which allows for faster completion and quicker entry into the workforce.

For those interested in related fields, a degree such as an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can combine technical skills with environmental problem-solving, while maintaining flexible study options.

Cost is often a major consideration. Prospective students frequently research the mechanical engineering cost of education to compare affordable choices that don’t sacrifice academic quality.

Another in-demand area is physics, where earning a bachelor of science in physics online prepares graduates for roles in research, technology, teaching, and beyond.

As online education options expand, students seeking flexibility and specialization can now pursue a wide variety of related degrees to launch or advance their tech-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Elena De Momi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles