World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
11663
World Ranking
5813
National Ranking
2644

Peter Kazanzides publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kazanzides sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Kazanzides D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kazanzides sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Kazanzides is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on engineering and medicine, with significant contributions in biomedical engineering and surgery.

Their scholarly output includes a substantial number of publications, with notable work in surgical simulation and training, soft robotics and applications, augmented reality applications, anatomy and medical technology, teleoperation and haptic systems, medical imaging and analysis, and robot manipulation and learning.

Frequent publication venues for their work include arXiv (Cornell University) with 22 publications, the International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery with 7, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters with 5, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics with 5, and IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine with 2.

  • Russell H. Taylor (22 coauthored papers)
  • Anton Deguet (17 coauthored papers)
  • Adnan Munawar (13 coauthored papers)
  • Jie Ying Wu (11 coauthored papers)
  • Francis X. Creighton (9 coauthored papers)

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Peter Kazanzides include:

  • Accelerating Surgical Robotics Research: A Review of 10 Years With the da Vinci Research Kit, 2021, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
  • A Surgical Robotic System for Treatment of Pelvic Osteolysis Using an FBG-Equipped Continuum Manipulator and Flexible Instruments, 2020, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
  • Fully immersive virtual reality for skull-base surgery: surgical training and beyond, 2023, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • Open Simulation Environment for Learning and Practice of Robot-Assisted Surgical Suturing, 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • AR-Loupe: Magnified Augmented Reality by Combining an Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display and a Loupe, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Best Publications

  • Medical robotics—Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy

    Guang Zhong Yang;James Cambias;Kevin Cleary;Eric Daimler

  • An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery

    R.H. Taylor;B.D. Mittelstadt;H.A. Paul;W. Hanson

  • An open-source research kit for the da Vinci® Surgical System

    Peter Kazanzides;Zihan Chen;Anton Deguet;Gregory S. Fischer

  • Methods and apparatus for registering CT-scan data to multiple fluoroscopic images

    Andre Pierre Gueziec;Peter Kazanzides;Russell H. Taylor

  • Design and Integration of a Telerobotic System for Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Throat

    Nabil Simaan;Kai Xu;Wei Wei;Ankur Kapoor

  • Interactive user interfaces for minimally invasive telesurgical systems

    Simon P. DiMaio;Christopher J. Hasser;Russell H. Taylor;David Q. Larkin

  • Development and Application of a New Steady-Hand Manipulator for Retinal Surgery

    B. Mitchell;J. Koo;M. Iordachita;P. Kazanzides

  • Anatomy-based registration of CT-scan and intraoperative X-ray images for guiding a surgical robot

    A. Gueziec;P. Kazanzides;B. Williamson;R.H. Taylor

  • Force sensing and control for a surgical robot

    P. Kazanzides;J. Zuhars;B. Mittelstadt;R.H. Taylor

  • Investigation of Attitude Tracking Using an Integrated Inertial and Magnetic Navigation System for Hand-Held Surgical Instruments

    Hongliang Ren;Peter Kazanzides

  • Computer-integrated revision total hip replacement surgery: concept and preliminary results.

    Russell H. Taylor;Leo Joskowicz;Bill Williamson;André Guéziec

  • Surgical and Interventional Robotics - Core Concepts, Technology, and Design [Tutorial]

    P. Kazanzides;G. Fichtinger;G.D. Hager;A.M. Okamura

  • An integrated system for planning, navigation and robotic assistance for skull base surgery.

    Tian Xia;Clint Baird;George Jallo;Kathryn Hayes

  • Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy

    Gabor Fichtinger;Jonathan Fiene;Christopher W. Kennedy;Gernot Kronreif

  • Intraoperative Image-based Multiview 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery: Incorporation of Fiducial-Based C-Arm Tracking and GPU-Acceleration

    Y. Otake;M. Armand;R. S. Armiger;M. D. Kutzer

  • An integrated system for cementless hip replacement

    P. Kazanzides;B.D. Mittelstadt;B.L. Musits;W.L. Bargar

  • A Review of Augmented Reality in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

    Long Qian;Jie Ying Wu;Simon P. DiMaio;Nassir Navab

  • Accelerating Surgical Robotics Research: Reviewing 10 Years of Research with the dVRK.

    Claudia D'Ettorre;Andrea Mariani;Agostino Stilli;Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena

  • A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery

    H.A. Paul;B. Mittlestadt;W.L. Bargar;B. Musits

  • Comparison of optical see-through head-mounted displays for surgical interventions with object-anchored 2D-display.

    Long Qian;Alexander Barthel;Alexander Barthel;Alex Johnson;Greg Osgood

  • Surgical and Interventional Robotics

    Peter Kazanzides;Gabor Fichtinger;Gregory D. Hager;Allison M. Okamura

  • An Image-directed Robotic System For Precise Orthopaedic Surgery

    R.H. Taylor;H.A. Paul;B.D. Mittelstadt;W. Hanson

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell H. Taylor
Russell H. Taylor Johns Hopkins University
Iulian Iordachita
Iulian Iordachita Johns Hopkins University
John Wong
John Wong Johns Hopkins University
Gabor Fichtinger
Gabor Fichtinger Queen's University
Louis L. Whitcomb
Louis L. Whitcomb Johns Hopkins University
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Emad M. Boctor
Emad M. Boctor Johns Hopkins University
Joseph M. Herman
Joseph M. Herman National Cancer Institute
Gregory D. Hager
Gregory D. Hager Johns Hopkins University
Hongliang Ren
Hongliang Ren Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of options for online education and career development. For those seeking a streamlined entry into tech, some of the easy online associate degrees can help students build foundational skills quickly and at lower costs, making them ideal for career changers or beginners.

For educators or professionals interested in advanced leadership roles, pursuing edd programs online can provide in-depth expertise and opportunities for advancement within academia or administration.

It’s crucial to ensure that any online degree program comes from a reputable institution. Researching the best online accredited universities helps guarantee recognized qualifications and better career outcomes.

For those interested in the gaming industry, there are specialized paths like a game design degree online, which focuses on the creative and technical aspects of interactive entertainment.

Exploring these diverse online degree options can help you find the educational pathway that best aligns with your career goals in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Kazanzides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles