World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
113
Citations
110373
World Ranking
72
National Ranking
27

Jerome R. Morgan publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome R. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 202 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jerome R. Morgan D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome R. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Structural engineering

His primary areas of investigation include Surgical stapling, Tissue thickness, STAPLE DRIVER, Robot end effector and Mechanical engineering. His Surgical stapling research incorporates elements of Structural engineering, Engineering drawing and Cartridge. His Tissue thickness research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Surgical instrument, Buttress, Mechanism and Control theory.

His Surgical instrument research incorporates themes from Vibration, Tube, Simulation, Port and Biomedical engineering. In his papers, Jerome R. Morgan integrates diverse fields, such as STAPLE DRIVER and Geology. His research integrates issues of Control engineering, Bar, Longitudinal axis and Drive shaft in his study of Robot end effector.

His most cited work include:

  • Articulating surgical stapling instrument incorporating a two-piece e-beam firing mechanism (1344 citations)
  • Motor-driven surgical cutting and fastening instrument with tactile position feedback (1265 citations)
  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with audible and visual feedback features (1064 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Robot end effector, Surgical instrument, Cartridge, Mechanical engineering and Surgical stapling. His work carried out in the field of Robot end effector brings together such families of science as Control theory, Drive shaft, Control engineering, Simulation and Surgical device. His work deals with themes such as Acoustics, Ultrasonic sensor, Computer hardware, Actuator and Signal, which intersect with Surgical instrument.

His Cartridge study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Engineering drawing, Fastener, Structural engineering, Deck and Biomedical engineering. Particularly relevant to Mechanism is his body of work in Mechanical engineering. His STAPLE DRIVER and Surgical staple study, which is part of a larger body of work in Surgical stapling, is frequently linked to Geology, bridging the gap between disciplines.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Robot end effector (35.34%)
  • Surgical instrument (32.47%)
  • Cartridge (31.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Surgical instrument (32.47%)
  • Robot end effector (35.34%)
  • Mechanical engineering (31.03%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Mechanical engineering, Biomedical engineering and Computer hardware. His studies in Surgical instrument integrate themes in fields like Electrical contacts, Optoelectronics, Bending and Medical physics. His Robot end effector research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mechanism, Clamping, Surgery, Actuator and Stroke.

His work on Limiting and Interlock as part of general Mechanical engineering study is frequently connected to Articulation and Section, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. Jerome R. Morgan combines subjects such as Layer, Cartridge and Molding with his study of Biomedical engineering. The various areas that Jerome R. Morgan examines in his Cartridge study include Bracket, Surgical stapling and Base.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • SURGICAL ANVIL MANUFACTURING METHODS (85 citations)
  • SURGICAL FIRING MEMBER ARRANGEMENTS (84 citations)
  • ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCER TECHNIQUES FOR ULTRASONIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT (21 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Surgery

Jerome R. Morgan focuses on Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Biomedical engineering, Surgical stapling and Computer hardware. His research integrates issues of Acoustics, Node, Medical physics and Machining in his study of Surgical instrument. The concepts of his Robot end effector study are interwoven with issues in Clamping and Surgery.

His Biomedical engineering study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Layer and Cartridge. He performs multidisciplinary study in the fields of Surgical stapling and Geology via his papers. His study in Computer hardware is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Synchronizing, Communication link, Image frame, STERILE FIELD and Visualization.

Best Publications

  • Articulating surgical stapling instrument incorporating a two-piece e-beam firing mechanism

    Frederick E. Shelton;Michael E. Setser;Kevin R. Doll;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Staple cartridge including a compressible member

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan;Christopher J. Hess;II William B. Weisenburgh

  • Motor-driven surgical cutting and fastening instrument with tactile position feedback

    Frederick E. Shelton;John N. Ouwerkerk;Jerome R. Morgan;Jeffrey S. Swayze

  • CARTRIDGE FOR SURGICAL FASTENERS

    Riestenberg Paul F;Shelton Iv Frederick E;Swayze Jeffrey S;Morgan Jerome R

  • Surgical stapling instruments with collapsible features for controlling staple height

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jeffrey S. Swayze;Leslie M. Fugikawa;Eugene L. Timperman

  • Staple cartridge comprising staples with different unformed heights

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jeffrey S. Swayze;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with audible and visual feedback features

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan;Eugene L. Timperman;Leslie M. Fugikawa

  • Motor-driven surgical cutting/fastening instrument with adaptive user feedback

    Jerome R Morgan;John N Ouwerkerk;Frederick E Shelton;ジェローム・アール・モルガン

  • Surgical system comprising drive systems

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Surgical instrument for assessing the state of a staple cartridge

    James R. Giordano;Jeffrey S. Swayze;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Robotically-driven surgical instrument including a drive system

    Frederick E. Shelton;Michael E. Setser;Kevin R. Doll;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Stapling instrument for use with a surgical robot

    Kyle P. Moore;Frederick E. Shelton;II William B. Weisenburgh;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with electrical control and recording mechanisms

    Frederick E. Shelton;Randall J. Tanguay;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Surgical system with selectively articulatable end effector

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with improved volume storage

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Surgical stapling devices having laterally movable anvils

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan

  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with mechanical linkage coupling end effector and trigger motion

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan;Eugene L. Timperman;Leslie M. Fugikawa

  • Fastener cartridge assembly comprising a fixed anvil and a staple driver arrangement

    Jeffrey S. Swayze;Joseph C. Hueil;Jerome R. Morgan;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Pneumatically powered surgical cutting and fastening instrument with manually operated retraction apparatus

    Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan;Eugene L. Timperman;Leslie M. Fugikawa

  • instrumento grampeador cirúrgico possuindo effector de extremidade de espaçamento de força controlada

    Iv Fredrick E Shelton;Morgan Jerome R

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick E. Shelton
Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jeffrey S. Swayze
Jeffrey S. Swayze Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Iv Frederick E. Shelton
Iv Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Chester O. Baxter
Chester O. Baxter Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Christopher J. Hess
Christopher J. Hess Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Eugene L. Timperman
Eugene L. Timperman Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Bret W. Smith
Bret W. Smith Johnson & Johnson
Kevin L. Houser
Kevin L. Houser Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Taylor W. Aronhalt
Taylor W. Aronhalt Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Chad P. Boudreaux
Chad P. Boudreaux Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jerome R. Morgan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles