World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 63 1709 1624 546 494 117 48442

Chester O. Baxter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chester O. Baxter between 1998 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chester O. Baxter published across 24 years, from 1998 to 2021, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2020. 65 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2020. 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 24 publications
1998 2021

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chester O. Baxter: publications per year, 1998 to 2021
Year Publications
1998 4
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 12
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 5
2010 3
2011 10
2012 32
2013 25
2014 9
2015 12
2016 14
2017 28
2018 28
2019 11
2020 41
2021 24
Total 282
Download as CSV

Chester O. Baxter publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester O. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369 117
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Chester O. Baxter D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester O. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131 63
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Structural engineering

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Tissue thickness, Cartridge, Engineering drawing, Surgical stapling and Biomedical engineering. His work carried out in the field of Cartridge brings together such families of science as Surgical instrument, Composite material and Fastener. His research on Engineering drawing frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Mechanical engineering.

His studies deal with areas such as Structural engineering and Compression pressure as well as Mechanical engineering. STAPLE DRIVER is the focus of his Surgical stapling research. Chester O. Baxter combines subjects such as Tube, Insert and Anatomy with his study of Biomedical engineering.

His most cited work include:

  • Selectively orientable implantable fastener cartridge (980 citations)
  • Lockout arrangement for a surgical stapler (920 citations)
  • Surgical stapling instruments with cam-driven staple deployment arrangements (873 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Surgical instrument, Cartridge, Robot end effector, Mechanical engineering and Biomedical engineering. In his work, Clamping is strongly intertwined with Acoustics, which is a subfield of Surgical instrument. Chester O. Baxter interconnects Tissue thickness, Engineering drawing, Surgical stapling, Deck and Fastener in the investigation of issues within Cartridge.

His study explores the link between Surgical stapling and topics such as Base that cross with problems in Surgical staple. His study in Mechanical engineering is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Structural engineering and Actuator. Chester O. Baxter has researched Biomedical engineering in several fields, including Surgical site and Ultrasonic sensor.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Surgical instrument (29.28%)
  • Cartridge (26.52%)
  • Robot end effector (25.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Surgical instrument (29.28%)
  • Robot end effector (25.97%)
  • Cartridge (26.52%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Chester O. Baxter spends much of his time researching Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Cartridge, Mechanical engineering and Surgical stapling. His Surgical instrument research includes elements of Computer hardware, Control, Simulation and Biomedical engineering, Surgical device. His research in Biomedical engineering intersects with topics in Surgical site and Visual feedback.

His work in Cartridge addresses subjects such as Suturing instrument, which are connected to disciplines such as STRIPS, Composite material, Tissue compression and Punching. His study on Mechanical engineering is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Turn. His Surgical stapling research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Clamp, Bracket, Structural engineering, Orthodontics and Base.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • CLOSED LOOP VELOCITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT (33 citations)
  • METHOD FOR OPERATING A POWERED ARTICULATING MULTI-CLIP APPLIER (22 citations)
  • SURGICAL TOOLS CONFIGURED FOR INTERCHANGEABLE USE WITH DIFFERENT CONTROLLER INTERFACES (21 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Structural engineering

His scientific interests lie mostly in Robot end effector, Surgical instrument, Control theory, Computer hardware and Closed position. His Robot end effector investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Actuator and Position. His Actuator study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Mechanical engineering, Rotation and Reciprocating motion.

His studies in Surgical instrument integrate themes in fields like Control and Biomedical engineering, Surgical device. His Biomedical engineering research incorporates themes from Surgical site and Visual feedback. Along with Closure, other disciplines of study including Cartridge and Surgical staple are integrated into his research.

Best Publications

  • CARTRIDGE FOR SURGICAL FASTENERS

    Riestenberg Paul F;Shelton Iv Frederick E;Swayze Jeffrey S;Morgan Jerome R

  • Lockout arrangement for a surgical stapler

    Chester O. Baxter;James J. Bedi

  • Surgical stapling instrument with improved firing trigger arrangement

    Chester O. Baxter;James J. Bedi

  • Surgical stapling instrument with apparatus for providing anvil position feedback

    John P. Measamer;Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Richard P. Fuchs

  • Surgical stapling instrument with cutting member arrangement

    Chester O. Baxter;James J. Bedi

  • Retainer assembly including a tissue thickness compensator

    Chester O. Baxter;Frederick E. Shelton;Katherine J. Schmid;Jerome R. Morgan

  • END EFFECTOR HAVING COATING LAYER FOR ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT

    Yates David C;Shuster Phillip Q;Moran Kenneth;Baxter Iii Chester O

  • Staple cartridge comprising staples positioned within a compressible portion thereof

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Joseph E. Young

  • Tissue thickness compensator comprising at least one medicament

    Frederick E. Shelton;Katherine J. Schmid;Charles J. Scheib;Taylor W. Aronhalt

  • Surgical stapler with floating anvil

    Frederick E. Shelton;Joseph E. Young;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Chester O. Baxter

  • Tissue thickness compensator comprising a reservoir

    Venkataramanan Mandakolathur Vasudevan;Cortney E. Henderson;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Jeffrey L. Aldridge

  • Tissue thickness compensator comprising detachable portions

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Charles J. Scheib

  • Tissue thickness compensator comprising a plurality of capsules

    Venkataramanan Mandakolathur Vasudevan;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Jeffrey L. Aldridge;Charles J. Scheib

  • Surgical stapler anvil comprising a plurality of forming pockets

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter

  • Tissue thickness compensator for a surgical stapler

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter

  • Staple cartridge comprising compressible distortion resistant components

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Joseph E. Young

  • Motor driven surgical instruments with lockable dual drive shafts

    Shailendra K. Parihar;Robert L. Koch;Chester O. Baxter;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Staple cartridge comprising a tissue thickness compensator

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Joseph E. Young

  • Replaceable clip cartridge for a clip applier

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter

  • Staple cartridge loading assembly

    Frederick E. Shelton;Chester O. Baxter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Venkataramanan Mandakolathur Vasudevan

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick E. Shelton
Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jerome R. Morgan
Jerome R. Morgan Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Taylor W. Aronhalt
Taylor W. Aronhalt Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jeffrey S. Swayze
Jeffrey S. Swayze Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Michael J. Stokes
Michael J. Stokes Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Kevin L. Houser
Kevin L. Houser Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Kevin W. Smith
Kevin W. Smith Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Chad P. Boudreaux
Chad P. Boudreaux Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Christopher J. Hess
Christopher J. Hess Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Iv Frederick E. Shelton
Iv Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Chester O. Baxter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles