World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 40 7141 6894 1934 1793 86 25536

Mark D. Overmyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark D. Overmyer between 2008 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark D. Overmyer published across 14 years, from 2008 to 2021, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2015. 16 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2015. 2008: 7 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 1 publication
2008 2021

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark D. Overmyer: publications per year, 2008 to 2021
Year Publications
2008 7
2009 2
2010 4
2011 9
2012 3
2013 3
2014 11
2015 24
2016 15
2017 21
2018 8
2019 18
2020 15
2021 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Mark D. Overmyer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Overmyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190 86
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark D. Overmyer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Overmyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348 40
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Electrical engineering
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Surgery

Mark D. Overmyer mostly deals with Surgical instrument, Simulation, Robot end effector, Signal and Computer hardware. His studies in Surgical instrument integrate themes in fields like Control engineering, Control system and Control. His Simulation study combines topics in areas such as Creep, Stability and Viscoelasticity.

Robot end effector is intertwined with Articulation, Cartridge, Biomedical engineering, Endoscopic Procedure and Piston in his research. His Signal study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Power and Electronic engineering. The study incorporates disciplines such as Surgical stapling, Electrical contacts, Electric motor and Current sensor, Current in addition to Microcontroller.

His most cited work include:

  • Articulatable surgical instrument comprising a firing drive (789 citations)
  • Surgical instrument comprising a sensor system (744 citations)
  • Control systems for surgical instruments (713 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Simulation, Mechanical engineering and Electrical engineering. His Surgical instrument research integrates issues from Control engineering, Stroke, Computer hardware and Signal. His Signal research focuses on Electronic engineering and how it relates to Microcontroller.

The Simulation study combines topics in areas such as Mode and Cartridge. As a member of one scientific family, Mark D. Overmyer mostly works in the field of Mechanical engineering, focusing on Surgical stapling and, on occasion, Base and Lock. His work in Electrical engineering addresses subjects such as Power, which are connected to disciplines such as Voltage.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Surgical instrument (49.26%)
  • Robot end effector (30.88%)
  • Simulation (18.38%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Surgical instrument (49.26%)
  • Robot end effector (30.88%)
  • Simulation (18.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Simulation, Mechanical engineering and Surgical stapling. In his work, Blocking is strongly intertwined with Biomedical engineering, which is a subfield of Surgical instrument. His Simulation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Mode, Reset, Fuse, Cartridge and Stroke.

His Cartridge research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Lock and Closed position. His Surgical stapling research includes elements of Control system, Control engineering, Barrel, Electric motor and Battery. His work is dedicated to discovering how Control system, Control are connected with Bridge circuit and Automotive engineering and other disciplines.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Jaw actuated lock arrangements for preventing advancement of a firing member in a surgical end effector unless an unfired cartridge is installed in the end effector (145 citations)
  • SHAFT ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A CLUTCH CONFIGURED TO ADAPT THE OUTPUT OF A ROTARY FIRING MEMBER TO TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS (144 citations)
  • ROBOTIC ATTACHMENT COMPRISING EXTERIOR DRIVE ACTUATOR (21 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Surgery

Mark D. Overmyer mainly investigates Robot end effector, Surgical instrument, Cartridge, Simulation and Mechanical engineering. His Robot end effector investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Calibration, Longitudinal axis, Acoustics, Rotation and Controller. The concepts of his Surgical instrument study are interwoven with issues in Tension and Biomedical engineering.

The various areas that Mark D. Overmyer examines in his Cartridge study include Lock, Closed position, Reset, Fuse and Stroke. Mark D. Overmyer has researched Simulation in several fields, including Mode, Transmission and Clutch. His Actuator research extends to the thematically linked field of Mechanical engineering.

Best Publications

  • Articulatable surgical instrument comprising a firing drive

    Wendy A. Kerr;Thomas W. Lytle;Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Surgical instrument comprising a sensor system

    Richard L. Leimbach;Shane R. Adams;Mark D. Overmyer;Iv Frederick E Shelton

  • sistemas de controle para instrumentos cirúrgicos

    Mark D Overmyer;Richard L Leimbach;Shane R Adams

  • Device for applying adjunct in endoscopic procedure

    Brian W. Bear;Thu Anh Le;Thomas W. Lytle;Mark D. Overmyer

  • Control arrangements for a drive member of a surgical instrument

    Richard L. Leimbach;Mark D. Overmyer;Shane R. Adams;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Modular powered surgical instrument with detachable shaft assemblies

    Richard L. Leimbach;Mark D. Overmyer;Shane R. Adams

  • Power management through segmented circuit and variable voltage protection

    Richard L. Leimbach;Shane R. Adams;Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Feedback algorithms for manual bailout systems for surgical instruments

    Richard L. Leimback;Shane R. Adams;Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Surgical stapling instrument system

    Richard L. Leimbach;Shane R. Adams;Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Power management through sleep options of segmented circuit and wake up control

    Richard L. Leimbach;Shane R. Adams;Brett E. Swensgard;Mark D. Overmyer

  • Sterilization verification circuit

    Richard L. Leimbach;Shane R. Adams;Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Modular surgical instrument system

    Mark D. Overmyer;Kevin L. Houser;Frederick E. Shelton;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Surgical instrument comprising interactive systems

    Thomas W. Lytle;Mark D. Overmyer;Shane R. Adams;Richard L. Leimback

  • Interface systems for use with surgical instruments

    Mark D. Overmyer;Brett E. Swensgard;Shane R. Adams;Thomas W. Lytle

  • DRIVE STRUCTURES FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITH POSSIBILITY OF ARTICULATED TURN

    Overmajer Mark D;Bakster Iii Chester O;Shelton Iv Frederik E;Morgan Dzherom R

  • SURGICAL INSTRUMENT ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SYSTEMS WITH POSSIBILITY OF BLOCKING

    Kerr Uendi A;Litl Iv Tomas U;Overmajer Mark D;Svensgard Brett E

  • Mechanisms for compensating for drivetrain failure in powered surgical instruments

    Frederick E. Shelton;Mark D. Overmyer;David C. Yates;Jason L. Harris

  • Methods and devices for locking a surgical device based on loading of a fastener cartridge in the surgical device

    Sol A. Posada;Mark D. Overmyer;Frederick E. Shelton;Brian F. DiNardo

  • Jaw actuated lock arrangements for preventing advancement of a firing member in a surgical end effector unless an unfired cartridge is installed in the end effector

    Morgan R. Hunter;Taylor W. Aronhalt;Austin E. Wise;James A. Vandewalle

  • Shaft assembly comprising a manually-operable retraction system for use with a motorized surgical instrument system

    Mark D. Overmyer;Frederick E. Shelton;Jeffrey S. Swayze

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick E. Shelton
Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jeffrey S. Swayze
Jeffrey S. Swayze Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Kevin L. Houser
Kevin L. Houser Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Iv Frederick E. Shelton
Iv Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
david c yates
david c yates Kaleidoscope Innovation and Product Design
Michael J. Stokes
Michael J. Stokes Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Bret W. Smith
Bret W. Smith Johnson & Johnson
Jerome R. Morgan
Jerome R. Morgan Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Christopher J. Hess
Christopher J. Hess Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Taylor W. Aronhalt
Taylor W. Aronhalt Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Overmyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles