World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 68 1176 1111 385 344 101 49078

david c yates publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by david c yates between 1994 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. david c yates published across 27 years, from 1994 to 2020, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2016. 4 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2016. 1994: 13 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications
1994 2020

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
david c yates: publications per year, 1994 to 2020
Year Publications
1994 13
1995 16
1996 16
1997 2
1998 2
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 7
2009 4
2010 0
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 10
2015 7
2016 26
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 4
Total 123
Download as CSV

david c yates publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where david c yates sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283 101
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

david c yates D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where david c yates sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87 68
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Electrical engineering
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Voltage

His primary areas of investigation include STAPLE DRIVER, Biomedical engineering, Electrical impedance, Tissue thickness and Bipolar forceps. David C. Yates interconnects Radio frequency energy, Electrically conductive, Cutting tool and Electric potential energy in the investigation of issues within STAPLE DRIVER. His work in Biomedical engineering addresses issues such as Clamping, which are connected to fields such as Process.

His research in the fields of Tissue impedance overlaps with other disciplines such as Energy source. David C. Yates has included themes like Generator and Voltage in his Tissue impedance study. In his study, Surgical instrument and Control theory is inextricably linked to Surgical stapling, which falls within the broad field of Tissue thickness.

His most cited work include:

  • Electrosurgical hemostatic device (1861 citations)
  • Impedance feedback monitor for electrosurgical instrument (1350 citations)
  • Hemostatic surgical cutting or stapling instrument (1192 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Robot end effector, Electrical engineering, Surgical instrument, Biomedical engineering and Battery are his primary areas of study. His Electrical engineering research includes themes of Battery pack, Battery and Electronic engineering. His research in Surgical instrument intersects with topics in Mechanism, Ultrasonic sensor, Automotive engineering and Simulation.

His work on STAPLE DRIVER as part of general Biomedical engineering research is often related to Bipolar forceps, thus linking different fields of science. His Battery research focuses on Motor control and how it connects with Electric motor. In his study, ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICE is strongly linked to Acoustics, which falls under the umbrella field of Electrical impedance.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Robot end effector (30.97%)
  • Electrical engineering (28.32%)
  • Surgical instrument (28.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2018)?

  • Surgical instrument (28.32%)
  • Robot end effector (30.97%)
  • Battery (15.04%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David C. Yates spends much of his time researching Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Battery, Modular design and Ultrasonic sensor. The concepts of his Surgical instrument study are interwoven with issues in Mechanism, Automotive engineering and Simulation. His Battery research focuses on Motor control and how it relates to Limiting.

His Ultrasonic sensor study also includes

  • Radio frequency and related Signal,
  • Generator, which have a strong connection to Electronic engineering, Waveform, Electronic circuit, Function generator and Arbitrary waveform generator,
  • Radio frequency energy together with Low impedance, Surgical site, Non-volatile memory and Biomedical engineering. His Signal research entails a greater understanding of Electrical engineering. His Electrical engineering research includes elements of Battery and Battery pack.

Between 2015 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Charging system that enables emergency resolutions for charging a battery (500 citations)
  • Modular stapling assembly (490 citations)
  • Reinforced battery for a surgical instrument (487 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Electrical engineering
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electronic engineering

David C. Yates mainly investigates Surgical instrument, Robot end effector, Electrical engineering, Mechanical engineering and Control engineering. His studies in Surgical instrument integrate themes in fields like Generator, Computer hardware, Rotation around a fixed axis and Stroke. He is studying Battery, which is a component of Electrical engineering.

His Battery research incorporates themes from Control system, Frame, Electric motor and Motor control. The various areas that he examines in his Control engineering study include Motion and Torque. His Cartridge study combines topics in areas such as Electrical contacts and Surgical stapling.

Best Publications

  • Electrosurgical hemostatic device

    David C. Yates;Jesse J. Kuhns;Steven H. Mersch;Martin Madden

  • Impedance feedback monitor for electrosurgical instrument

    Warren P. Loveland Williamson;David C. West Chester Yates

  • ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN SURGICAL CUTTING INSTRUMENT

    Jehjts Dehvid K;Shelton Frederik Eh;Smit Bret;Svensgard Brett Eh

  • Hemostatic surgical cutting or stapling instrument

    David C. Yates

  • Motorized surgical instrument

    David C. Yates;Thomas W. Huitema;Frederick E. Shelton;Brett E. Swensgard

  • Impedance feedback monitor with query electrode for electrosurgical instrument

    Warren P. Williamson;David C. Yates

  • Electrosurgical hemostatic device with recessed and/or offset electrodes

    David C. Yates;James W. Voegele

  • MOTORISED CUTTING AND FASTENING SURGICAL INSTRUMENT PROVIDED WITH POWER SOURCE ON HANDLE BASE

    Jehjts Dehvid K;Dzhiordano Dzhejms R;Shelton Frederik Eh

  • Impedance feedback electrosurgical system

    Paul C. Nardella;David Carlyle Yates

  • Electrosurgical clamping device with improved coagulation feedback

    David C. Yates;William D. Fox

  • Electrosurgical clamping device with coagulation feedback

    Dale R. Schulze;James Giordano;David Yates

  • Electrosurgical device and method

    David C. Yates;Jesse J. Kuhns;Steven H. Mersch;Martin Madden

  • Motorized surgical cutting and fastening instrument

    David C. Yates;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Method for using an electrosurgical device on lung tissue

    Warren D. Sheffield;Jesse Kuhns;David C. Yates;Steven H. Mersch

  • Motorized cutting and fastening instrument having control circuit for optimizing battery usage

    David C. Yates;Thomas W. Huitema;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Motorized surgical cutting and fastening instrument having a magnetic drive train torque limiting device

    David C. Yates;Thomas W. Huitema

  • RF bipolar mesentery severing and coagulating device

    Scott D. Wampler;Trevor W. V. Speeg;David C. Yates;Kendall L. Dobler

  • Surgical cutting and fastening instrument having rf electrodes

    David C. Yates;Thomas W. Huitema;Frederick E. Shelton

  • Electrosurgical device having a visible indicator

    Paul C. Nardella;David C. Yates

  • End effector with compliant clamping jaw

    Barry C. Worrell;Frederick E. Shelton;Jerome R. Morgan;Michael S. Cropper

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick E. Shelton
Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Kevin L. Houser
Kevin L. Houser Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Eitan T. Wiener
Eitan T. Wiener Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Mark D. Overmyer
Mark D. Overmyer Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jeffrey S. Swayze
Jeffrey S. Swayze Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Jerome R. Morgan
Jerome R. Morgan Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Iv Frederick E. Shelton
Iv Frederick E. Shelton Johnson & Johnson (United States)
John A. Hibner
John A. Hibner Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Chad P. Boudreaux
Chad P. Boudreaux Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Chester O. Baxter
Chester O. Baxter Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing david c yates

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles