World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
26502
World Ranking
4694
National Ranking
2601

Deborah E. Rupp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Deborah E. Rupp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah E. Rupp is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences and business disciplines, with a primary focus on organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their recent work includes a variety of publications across leading journals. Some notable papers are:

  • Corporate social responsibility and individual behaviour (2024) published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Job analysis and job classification for addressing pay inequality in organizations: Adjusting our methods within a shifting legal landscape (2022) published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • The role of justice perceptions in formal and informal university technology transfer (2021) published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Stronger Together: A Call for Gender-Inclusive Leadership in Business Schools (2023) published in Journal of Management
  • Addressing the so-called validity-diversity trade-off: Exploring the practicalities and legal defensibility of Pareto-optimization for reducing adverse impact within personnel selection (2020) published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephen J. Vodanovich
  • Nicole Strah
  • Anna N. Hoover
  • Herman Aguinis
  • Ellen Ernst Kossek

Deborah E. Rupp's publications often appear in these venues:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Their main fields of study are Business, Management and Accounting and Social Sciences, with work deeply rooted in subfields such as:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Psychology

Key research topics covered in their work are:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Management and Organizational Studies

Among their scholarly contributions is the book Employment Discrimination, published in 2022 by Oxford University Press.

Best Publications

  • Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations

    Ruth V. Aguilera;Deborah E. Rupp;Cynthia A. Williams;Jyoti Ganapathi

  • The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors.

    Russell Cropanzano;Deborah E. Rupp;Zinta S. Byrne

  • Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice.

    Russell Cropanzano;Zinta S. Byrne;D.Ramona Bobocel;Deborah E. Rupp

  • Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework

    Deborah E. Rupp;Jyoti Ganapathi;Ruth V. Aguilera;Cynthia A. Williams

  • The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice

    Deborah E Rupp;Russell Cropanzano

  • Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model†

    James J. Lavelle;Deborah E. Rupp;Joel Brockner

  • The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework.

    Hui Liao;Deborah E Rupp

  • Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US*

    Ruth V. Aguilera;Cynthia A. Williams;John M. Conley;Deborah E. Rupp

  • Three roads to organizational justice

    Russell Cropanzano;Deborah E. Rupp;Carolyn J. Mohler;Marshall Schminke

  • Applicants' and Employees' Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effects of First‐Party Justice Perceptions and Moral Identity

    Deborah E. Rupp;Ruodan Shao;Meghan A. Thornton;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • When customers lash out: the effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions.

    Deborah E. Rupp;Sharmin Spencer

  • The Multiple Pathways through which Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Organizational Identification and Multifoci Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Cultural and Social Orientations.

    Omer Farooq;Deborah E. Rupp;Mariam Farooq

  • Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological, Person-Centric, and Progressing

    Deborah E. Rupp;Drew B. Mallory

  • An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility:

    Deborah E. Rupp

  • The multidimensional nature of ageism: construct validity and group differences.

    Deborah E. Rupp;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Marcus Credé

  • How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: implications for job performance.

    Abraham Carmeli;Batia Ben-Hador;David A. Waldman;Deborah E. Rupp

  • Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level

    Marshall Schminke;Russell Cropanzano;Deborah E Rupp

  • Angry, guilty, and conflicted: injustice toward coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms.

    Sharmin Spencer;Deborah E. Rupp

  • Customer (In)Justice and Emotional Labor: The Role of Perspective Taking, Anger, and Emotional Regulation

    Deborah E. Rupp;A. Silke McCance;Sharmin Spencer;Karlheinz Sonntag

  • Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person‐Centric Work Psychology

    Howard M. Weiss;Deborah E. Rupp

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Stephen J. Vodanovich
Stephen J. Vodanovich University of West Florida
Alicia A. Grandey
Alicia A. Grandey Pennsylvania State University
James M. Diefendorff
James M. Diefendorff University of Akron
Marcus Credé
Marcus Credé Iowa State University
Zinta S. Byrne
Zinta S. Byrne Colorado State University
Hui Liao
Hui Liao University of Maryland, College Park
Samuel Aryee
Samuel Aryee University of Surrey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of fulfilling careers, both in clinical and non-clinical settings. Many graduates pursue advanced degrees in specialized areas closely connected to psychology, such as speech-language pathology or counseling. With the growth of flexible online programs, it’s increasingly possible to obtain foundational and advanced degrees while balancing work or family commitments.

Those interested in a hands-on healthcare career may consider becoming a speech-language pathologist. Each state has unique requirements for entering this field. For instance, you can explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Kentucky, becoming a speech therapist in Louisiana, Maine speech pathologist certification requirements, and Maryland speech pathologist certification requirements to compare steps, qualifications, and licensing procedures.

Whether you opt for online or traditional pathways, advancing your education in psychology or a related field can provide a solid foundation for a rewarding, in-demand career. Consider your state’s specific requirements and available online programs to find the best route for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah E. Rupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles