World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9005 8410 4773 4343 84 13666

Marcus Credé publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus Credé between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus Credé published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2017. 5 of the 90 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2017. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

90 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus Credé: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 1
2005 5
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 6
2011 3
2012 3
2013 6
2014 0
2015 2
2016 4
2017 11
2018 6
2019 11
2020 2
2021 6
2022 4
2023 3
2024 2
2025 3
Total 90
Download as CSV

Marcus Credé publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Credé sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 84
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus Credé D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Credé sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcus Credé is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology. Their research encompasses a variety of subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work is associated with several frequent publication venues, such as the Journal of Applied Psychology, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, The Leadership Quarterly, Educational Psychology Review, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This range reflects a focus on both applied and theoretical aspects of psychology.

Core research topics covered by Marcus Credé include:

  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The scientist has contributed to several papers in recent years, including:

  • "Does leadership still not need emotional intelligence? Continuing 'The Great EI Debate'" (2021), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • "Regarding Class Quizzes: a Meta-analytic Synthesis of Studies on the Relationship Between Frequent Low-Stakes Testing and Class Performance" (2020), published in Educational Psychology Review
  • "Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data" (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The common-sense model and mental illness outcomes: A meta-analysis" (2022), published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Should Language Acquisition Researchers Study 'Grit'? A Cautionary Note and Some Suggestions" (2021), published in Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning

Marcus Credé has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors. The most common collaborators are Lukas K. Sotola, P. D. Harms, Peter D. Harms, Paul B. Lester, and Tyler N. A. Fezzey. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications, supporting interdisciplinary and comprehensive approaches within their research domains.

Best Publications

  • Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.

    Marcus Credé;Michael C. Tynan;Peter D. Harms

  • The Validity of Self-Reported Grade Point Averages, Class Ranks, and Test Scores: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature

    Nathan R. Kuncel;Marcus Credé;Lisa L. Thomas

  • Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance

    Marcus Credé;Nathan R. Kuncel

  • Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis.

    Peter D. Harms;Marcus Credé

  • Class Attendance in College A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics

    Marcus Credé;Sylvia G. Roch;Urszula M. Kieszczynka

  • Adjustment to College as Measured by the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A Quantitative Review of its Structure and Relationships with Correlates and Consequences

    Marcus Credé;Sarah Niehorster

  • A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

    Marcus Credé;L. Alison Phillips

  • An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits.

    Marcus Credé;Peter D. Harms;Sarah Niehorster;Andrea Gaye-Valentine

  • Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review

    Peter D. Harms;Marcus Credé;Michael C. Tynan;Matthew R. Leon

  • The multidimensional nature of ageism: construct validity and group differences.

    Deborah E. Rupp;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Marcus Credé

  • What Shall We Do About Grit? A Critical Review of What We Know and What We Don’t Know:

    Marcus Credé

  • Age Bias in the Workplace: The Impact of Ageism and Causal Attributions1

    Deborah E. Rupp;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Marcus Credé

  • Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network

    Marcus Crede;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark;Reeshad S. Dalal

  • Two is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS).

    Rachel E. Brenner;Patrick J. Heath;David L. Vogel;Marcus Credé

  • An Assessment of the Magnitude of Effect Sizes Evidence From 30 Years of Meta-Analysis in Management

    Ted A. Paterson;P.D. Harms;Piers Steel;Marcus Credé

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and Undergraduate Grade Point Average (UGPA) for Graduate Student Academic Performance.

    Nathan R. Kuncel;Marcus Credé;Lisa L. Thomas

  • Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior

    Joel B. Carnevale;Lei Huang;Marcus Crede;Peter Harms

  • Random Responding as a Threat to the Validity of Effect Size Estimates in Correlational Research.

    Marcus Credé

  • 25 years of higher‐order confirmatory factor analysis in the organizational sciences: A critical review and development of reporting recommendations

    Marcus Credé;Peter D. Harms

  • Do First-Year Seminars Improve College Grades and Retention? A Quantitative Review of Their Overall Effectiveness and an Examination of Moderators of Effectiveness:

    Vahe Permzadian;Marcus Credé

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
Nathan R. Kuncel
Nathan R. Kuncel University of Minnesota
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Stephen J. Vodanovich
Stephen J. Vodanovich University of West Florida
Reeshad S. Dalal
Reeshad S. Dalal George Mason University
John P. Forsyth
John P. Forsyth University at Albany, State University of New York
Mitch Earleywine
Mitch Earleywine University at Albany, State University of New York
Dustin Wood
Dustin Wood University of Alabama
Ronald H. Humphrey
Ronald H. Humphrey Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a range of career opportunities, especially as the demand for qualified mental health professionals continues to rise across the US. Many students consider pursuing advanced study through flexible online programs, which can lead to roles such as licensed therapist, counselor, or clinical psychologist.

Requirements for becoming a licensed therapist can differ based on location. For example, see the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Fort Worth compared to licensed therapist requirements in Fremont. Each region may have specific educational prerequisites, supervised experience hours, and state-specific exams.

It’s also essential to understand local regulations. For instance, review the licensed therapist requirements in Fresno as well as the licensed therapist requirements in Garland. Staying informed about these requirements will help you select the program and career path that best fits your goals.

Ultimately, pursuing an online psychology degree offers flexibility and diverse opportunities. Make sure to research your area’s licensing pathways to maximize your career potential in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Credé

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles