World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
7600
World Ranking
10058
National Ranking
5303

Stephen J. Vodanovich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Vodanovich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen J. Vodanovich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Vodanovich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Vodanovich is affiliated with the University of West Florida in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding organizational and societal issues.

The scientist's scholarly output includes work in the following main fields of study:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Social Sciences
  • Arts and Humanities

Within these broad domains, specific subfields of study include:

  • Accounting
  • Gender Studies
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Religious studies

The main topics addressed in their research highlight areas of legal and social concern, including:

  • Business Law and Ethics
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Corporate Law and Human Rights
  • American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
  • Legal Cases and Commentary

Stephen J. Vodanovich has collaborated frequently with Deborah E. Rupp, with twelve collaborative works documented. This ongoing professional partnership suggests a shared research interest or complementary expertise in their fields.

Among their published works, they have authored at least one book published by Oxford University Press, titled Employment Discrimination, released in 2022. This book has accrued five citations, indicating its presence in scholarly discourse within its domain.

Best Publications

  • A Factor Analytic Study of the Boredom Proneness Scale

    Stephen J. Vodanovich;Steven J. Kass

  • Psychometric measures of boredom: a review of the literature.

    Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • The essence of boredom.

    William L. Mikulas;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • The multidimensional nature of ageism: construct validity and group differences.

    Deborah E. Rupp;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Marcus Credé

  • Boredom proneness: its relationship to psychological- and physical-health symptoms.

    Jennifer Sommers;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • State-Trait Boredom: Relationship to Absenteeism, Tenure, and Job Satisfaction

    Steven J. Kass;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Anne Callender

  • Workplace safety performance: conscientiousness, cognitive failure, and their interaction.

    J. Craig Wallace;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • A field study of distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction and organizational commitment.

    Rosemary H. Lowe;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: evidence for a two-factor short form.

    Stephen J. Vodanovich;J. Craig Wallace;Steven J. Kass

  • Age Bias in the Workplace: The Impact of Ageism and Causal Attributions1

    Deborah E. Rupp;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Marcus Credé

  • Self-Report Measures of Boredom: An Updated Review of the Literature.

    Stephen J Vodanovich;John D Watt

  • Boredom Proneness and Psychosocial Development

    John D. Watt;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • Boredom proneness: its relationship to positive and negative affect.

    Stephen J. Vodanovich;Kathryn M. Verner;Thomas V. Gilbride

  • Predicting cognitive failures from boredom proneness and daytime sleepiness scores: an investigation within military and undergraduate samples

    J.Craig Wallace;Stephen J Vodanovich;Becca M Restino

  • The Impact of Workaholism on Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction, and Perception of Leisure Activities

    Becca R. Brady;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Robert Rotunda

  • COGNITIVE CORRELATES OF BOREDOM PRONENESS : THE ROLE OF PRIVATE SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS AND ABSORPTION

    Hope M. Seib;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • CAN ACCIDENTS AND INDUSTRIAL MISHAPS BE PREDICTED? FURTHER INVESTIGATION INTO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COGNITIVE FAILURE AND REPORTS OF ACCIDENTS

    J. Craig Wallace;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • Boredom proneness and sleep disorders as predictors of adult attention deficit scores

    Steven J. Kass;J. Craig Wallace;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BOREDOM PRONENESS AND IMPULSIVITY

    John D. Watt;Stephen J. Vodanovich

  • Watching the Clock: Boredom and Vigilance Performance:

    Steven J. Kass;Stephen J. Vodanovich;Claudia J. Stanny;Tiffany M. Taylor

  • Are the Reported Barriers to Internet-Based Instruction Warranteed?: A Synthesis of Recent Research

    Chris Piotrowski;Stephen J. Vodanovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Marcus Credé
Marcus Credé Iowa State University
Frank Andrasik
Frank Andrasik University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students gravitate toward roles in counseling, mental health, and educational support, where specialized training and certifications are essential. Pursuing an online psychology degree can provide the flexibility to meet state-specific requirements while developing crucial skills for these careers.

If you're interested in school counseling, it's important to understand that each state sets its own standards for education and certification. For example, you can review the Montana school counselor education requirements to learn about the necessary coursework and licensure steps. Nebraska has its own set of Nebraska school counselor certification requirements, while Nevada outlines clear Nevada school counselor certification requirements for aspiring professionals. Those considering work in New England will want to familiarize themselves with the process of becoming a school counselor in New Hampshire.

Choosing the right online program and understanding various state pathways are crucial steps for anyone aiming for a rewarding psychology-based career in education or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Vodanovich

Trending Scientists