World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 881 770 559 478 449 31048
Medicine 87 13640 12835 6930 6410 387 27851

Jon D. Elhai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon D. Elhai between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon D. Elhai published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2021. 44 of the 515 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2021. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 31 publications
1997 2025

515 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon D. Elhai: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 5
1999 4
2000 3
2001 6
2002 2
2003 8
2004 10
2005 11
2006 9
2007 17
2008 18
2009 18
2010 16
2011 26
2012 16
2013 21
2014 29
2015 31
2016 26
2017 24
2018 18
2019 20
2020 37
2021 44
2022 27
2023 22
2024 13
2025 31
Total 515
Download as CSV

Jon D. Elhai publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Elhai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–450 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 449 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32 449
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon D. Elhai D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Elhai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon D. Elhai is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersections of social sciences and psychology, with a significant output in subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and education.

Their work covers a range of topics including the impact of technology on adolescents, digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, child development and digital technology, media influence and health, social media and politics, and posttraumatic stress disorder research.

Jon D. Elhai has published several papers, among which are:

  • COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Fear of missing out (FOMO): overview, theoretical underpinnings, and literature review on relations with severity of negative affectivity and problematic technology use, 2020, Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Depression, anxiety and fear of missing out as correlates of social, non-social and problematic smartphone use, 2020, Addictive Behaviors

Their frequent co-authors include Christian Montag, Haibo Yang, Cornelia Sindermann, Dmitri Rozgonjuk, and Brian J. Hall.

Jon D. Elhai contributes regularly to several scientific publication venues, notably:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Current Psychology
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
  • Psychiatry Research

The scientist has also published books with Frontiers Media, including "Online Psychology Beyond Addiction and Gaming: A Global Look at Mental Health and Internet-Related Technologies" (2022) and "Problematic Internet Technology Use: Assessment, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Adverse Consequences and Intervention" (2021).

Best Publications

  • Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology.

    Jon D. Elhai;Robert D. Dvorak;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall

  • Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Poly-victimization and risk of posttraumatic, depressive, and substance use disorders and involvement in delinquency in a national sample of adolescents.

    Julian D. Ford;Jon D. Elhai;Daniel F. Connor;B. Christopher Frueh

  • Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation.

    Claire A. Wolniewicz;Mojisola F. Tiamiyu;Justin W. Weeks;Jon D. Elhai

  • Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects?: A survey of traumatic stress professionals

    Jon D. Elhai;Matthew J. Gray;Todd B. Kashdan;C. Laurel Franklin

  • Coping style use predicts posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptom severity among college students reporting a traumatic loss

    Kimberly R. Schnider;Jon D. Elhai;Matt J. Gray

  • Reliability and validity of the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form.

    Jon D. Elhai;William Schweinle;Susan M. Anderson

  • Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model

    Cherie Armour;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Tory A. Durham;Ruby Charak

  • Current Directions in Videoconferencing Tele-Mental Health Research.

    Lisa K. Richardson;B. Christopher Frueh;Anouk L. Grubaugh;Leonard Egede

  • Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms

    Jon D. Elhai;Tracey L. Biehn;Cherie Armour;Cherie Armour;Jessica J. Klopper

  • Fear of missing out: Testing relationships with negative affectivity, online social engagement, and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Ahmad M. Alghraibeh;Ali A. Alafnan

  • Fear of missing out (FoMO) and rumination mediate relations between social anxiety and problematic Facebook use

    Abigail E. Dempsey;Kelsey D. O'Brien;Mojisola F. Tiamiyu;Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai

  • The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall

  • The underlying dimensions of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors.

    Ping Liu;Li Wang;Chengqi Cao;Richu Wang

  • COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults.

    Jon D. Elhai;Haibo Yang;Dean McKay;Gordon J.G. Asmundson

  • The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: a literature update, critique of methodology, and agenda for future research.

    Jon D. Elhai;Patrick A. Palmieri

  • The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall;Jon D. Elhai

  • A systematic literature review of PTSD's latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV to DSM-5.

    Cherie Armour;Jana Műllerová;Jon D. Elhai

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in DSM-5: Estimates of prevalence and symptom structure in a nonclinical sample of college students

    Jon D. Elhai;Megan E. Miller;Julian D. Ford;Tracey L. Biehn

Frequent Co-Authors

B. Christopher Frueh
B. Christopher Frueh University of Hawaii at Hilo
Cherie Armour
Cherie Armour Queen's University Belfast
Ateka A. Contractor
Ateka A. Contractor University of North Texas
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Dmitri Rozgonjuk University of Tartu
David Forbes
David Forbes University of Melbourne
Todd B. Kashdan
Todd B. Kashdan George Mason University
Ask Elklit
Ask Elklit University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and professional pathways. One popular avenue is becoming a substance abuse counselor—a role in high demand across the country. Online psychology degrees can help you gain the foundational knowledge necessary for this career, but it’s important to understand the certification and education requirements in different locations.

For example, local regulations can vary widely. If you're interested in working in California, review the Anaheim substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Similarly, those looking at opportunities in Alaska should consider the Anchorage substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Requirements are also unique in other regions, such as the Arlington substance abuse counselor certification requirements and the Atlanta substance abuse counselors education requirements. Researching each area’s standards is crucial before choosing your educational pathway. Online degrees provide flexibility and can help meet the prerequisites for licensure or certification, setting you up for a rewarding career in psychological services.

Best Scientists Citing Jon D. Elhai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles