World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27851
World Ranking
13641
National Ranking
6931

Psychology

D-Index
92
Citations
31048
World Ranking
881
National Ranking
559

Jon D. Elhai publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Elhai sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 449 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jon D. Elhai D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Elhai sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon D. Elhai is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersections of social sciences and psychology, with a significant output in subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and education.

Their work covers a range of topics including the impact of technology on adolescents, digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, child development and digital technology, media influence and health, social media and politics, and posttraumatic stress disorder research.

Jon D. Elhai has published several papers, among which are:

  • COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Fear of missing out (FOMO): overview, theoretical underpinnings, and literature review on relations with severity of negative affectivity and problematic technology use, 2020, Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Depression, anxiety and fear of missing out as correlates of social, non-social and problematic smartphone use, 2020, Addictive Behaviors

Their frequent co-authors include Christian Montag, Haibo Yang, Cornelia Sindermann, Dmitri Rozgonjuk, and Brian J. Hall.

Jon D. Elhai contributes regularly to several scientific publication venues, notably:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Current Psychology
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
  • Psychiatry Research

The scientist has also published books with Frontiers Media, including "Online Psychology Beyond Addiction and Gaming: A Global Look at Mental Health and Internet-Related Technologies" (2022) and "Problematic Internet Technology Use: Assessment, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Adverse Consequences and Intervention" (2021).

Best Publications

  • Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology.

    Jon D. Elhai;Robert D. Dvorak;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall

  • Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Poly-victimization and risk of posttraumatic, depressive, and substance use disorders and involvement in delinquency in a national sample of adolescents.

    Julian D. Ford;Jon D. Elhai;Daniel F. Connor;B. Christopher Frueh

  • Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation.

    Claire A. Wolniewicz;Mojisola F. Tiamiyu;Justin W. Weeks;Jon D. Elhai

  • Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects?: A survey of traumatic stress professionals

    Jon D. Elhai;Matthew J. Gray;Todd B. Kashdan;C. Laurel Franklin

  • Coping style use predicts posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptom severity among college students reporting a traumatic loss

    Kimberly R. Schnider;Jon D. Elhai;Matt J. Gray

  • Reliability and validity of the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form.

    Jon D. Elhai;William Schweinle;Susan M. Anderson

  • Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model

    Cherie Armour;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Tory A. Durham;Ruby Charak

  • Current Directions in Videoconferencing Tele-Mental Health Research.

    Lisa K. Richardson;B. Christopher Frueh;Anouk L. Grubaugh;Leonard Egede

  • On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findings

    Christian Montag;Haibo Yang;Jon D. Elhai

  • Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms

    Jon D. Elhai;Tracey L. Biehn;Cherie Armour;Cherie Armour;Jessica J. Klopper

  • Fear of missing out: Testing relationships with negative affectivity, online social engagement, and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Ahmad M. Alghraibeh;Ali A. Alafnan

  • Fear of missing out (FoMO) and rumination mediate relations between social anxiety and problematic Facebook use

    Abigail E. Dempsey;Kelsey D. O'Brien;Mojisola F. Tiamiyu;Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai

  • The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall

  • The underlying dimensions of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors.

    Ping Liu;Li Wang;Chengqi Cao;Richu Wang

  • COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults.

    Jon D. Elhai;Haibo Yang;Dean McKay;Gordon J.G. Asmundson

  • Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese young adults: Fear of missing out as a mediator.

    Jon D. Elhai;Haibo Yang;Jianwen Fang;Xuejun Bai

  • The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: a literature update, critique of methodology, and agenda for future research.

    Jon D. Elhai;Patrick A. Palmieri

  • The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall;Jon D. Elhai

  • A systematic literature review of PTSD's latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV to DSM-5.

    Cherie Armour;Jana Műllerová;Jon D. Elhai

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in DSM-5: Estimates of prevalence and symptom structure in a nonclinical sample of college students

    Jon D. Elhai;Megan E. Miller;Julian D. Ford;Tracey L. Biehn

Frequent Co-Authors

B. Christopher Frueh
B. Christopher Frueh University of Hawaii at Hilo
Cherie Armour
Cherie Armour Queen's University Belfast
Ateka A. Contractor
Ateka A. Contractor University of North Texas
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Dmitri Rozgonjuk University of Tartu
David Forbes
David Forbes University of Melbourne
Todd B. Kashdan
Todd B. Kashdan George Mason University
Ask Elklit
Ask Elklit University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and professional pathways. One popular avenue is becoming a substance abuse counselor—a role in high demand across the country. Online psychology degrees can help you gain the foundational knowledge necessary for this career, but it’s important to understand the certification and education requirements in different locations.

For example, local regulations can vary widely. If you're interested in working in California, review the Anaheim substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Similarly, those looking at opportunities in Alaska should consider the Anchorage substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Requirements are also unique in other regions, such as the Arlington substance abuse counselor certification requirements and the Atlanta substance abuse counselors education requirements. Researching each area’s standards is crucial before choosing your educational pathway. Online degrees provide flexibility and can help meet the prerequisites for licensure or certification, setting you up for a rewarding career in psychological services.

Best Scientists Citing Jon D. Elhai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles