World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3730 3440 13 13 588 11639

Ask Elklit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ask Elklit between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ask Elklit published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2014. 41 of the 677 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2014. 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 8 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 52 publications 2014: 58 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 46 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 22 publications
1975 2025

677 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ask Elklit: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 3
1976 3
1977 0
1978 2
1979 3
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 8
1986 1
1987 0
1988 4
1989 2
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 0
2000 7
2001 10
2002 8
2003 10
2004 9
2005 9
2006 14
2007 20
2008 18
2009 22
2010 23
2011 25
2012 30
2013 52
2014 58
2015 31
2016 38
2017 46
2018 26
2019 30
2020 22
2021 27
2022 22
2023 35
2024 19
2025 22
Total 677
Download as CSV

Ask Elklit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ask Elklit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–590 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 588 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9 588
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ask Elklit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ask Elklit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ask Elklit is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a strong emphasis on Clinical Psychology. Additional areas of research include General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Health.

Their research extensively covers topics related to trauma, mental health, and social factors affecting psychological well-being. Main topics of their work include:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Homelessness and Social Issues

Ask Elklit has published numerous studies, contributing across several prominent journals. Frequent publication venues with multiple contributions include:

  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses" (2022, Systematic Reviews)
  • "Compassion Protects Mental Health and Social Safeness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across 21 Countries" (2022, Mindfulness)
  • "Traumatic experiences, ICD-11 PTSD, ICD-11 complex PTSD, and the overlap with ICD-10 diagnoses" (2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica)
  • "The role of social connection on the experience of COVID-19 related post-traumatic growth and stress" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Adverse childhood experience is associated with an increased risk of reporting chronic pain in adulthood: a stystematic review and meta-analysis" (2023, European journal of psychotraumatology)

Collaborations form an important part of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Maria Louison Vang (25 coauthored papers)
  • Jesper Pihl-Thingvad (15 coauthored papers)
  • Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard (14 coauthored papers)
  • Paulo Ferrajão (13 coauthored papers)
  • Sarah Bøgelund Dokkedahl (8 coauthored papers)

Best Publications

  • Loneliness, Depressive Symptomatology, and Suicide Ideation in Adolescence: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses

    Mathias Lasgaard;Louis Goossens;Ask Elklit

  • PTSD-8: A Short PTSD Inventory.

    Maj Hansen;Tonny Elmose Andersen;Cherie Armour;Ask Elklit

  • Victimization and PTSD in a Danish National Youth Probability Sample

    Ask Elklit

  • The combined effect of gender and age on post traumatic stress disorder: do men and women show differences in the lifespan distribution of the disorder?

    Daniel N Ditlevsen;Ask Elklit

  • Variation in post-traumatic response: the role of trauma type in predicting ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptoms

    Philip Hyland;Philip Hyland;Jamie Murphy;Mark Shevlin;Frédérique Vallières

  • Evidence of symptom profiles consistent with posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in different trauma samples

    Ask Elklit;Philip Hyland;Mark Shevlin

  • Attachment styles, traumatic events, and PTSD: a cross-sectional investigation of adult attachment and trauma

    Maja O'Connor;Ask Elklit

  • Psychological reactions in Icelandic earthquake survivors.

    Iris Bödvarsdóttir;Ask Elklit

  • Exercise addiction: A study of eating disorder symptoms, quality of life, personality traits and attachment styles

    Mia Beck Lichtenstein;Erik Christiansen;Ask Elklit;Niels Bilenberg

  • Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in adult refugees: A systematic review of prospective treatment outcome studies and a critique

    Sabina Palic;Ask Elklit

  • The Crisis Support Scale: Psychometric qualities and further validation.

    Ask Elklit;Susanne Schmidt Pedersen;Lise Jind

  • Gender, trauma type, and PTSD prevalence: a re-analysis of 18 nordic convenience samples

    Daniel N Ditlevsen;Ask Elklit

  • Different sources of loneliness are associated with different forms of psychopathology in adolescence

    Mathias Lasgaard;Luc Goossens;Rikke Holm Bramsen;Tea Trillingsgaard

  • A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study

    Janet Froulund Jensen;Ingrid Egerod;Morten H Bestle;Doris F Christensen

  • An Assessment of the Construct Validity of the ICD-11 proposals for Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Philip Hyland;Mark Shevlin;Ask Elklit;Jamie Murphy

  • The structure of PTSD symptoms: A test of alternative models using confirmatory factor analysis

    Ask Elklit;Mark Shevlin

  • World Assumptions and Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

    Rachel Dekel;Zahava Solomon;Ask Elklit;Karni Ginzburg

  • A review of psychological factors related to bullying victimization in schools.

    Tine Bitsch Hansen;Lone Majlund Steenberg;Sabina Palic;Ask Elklit

  • A latent class analysis of childhood maltreatment: Identifying abuse typologies

    Cherie Armour;Ask Elklit;Mogens Nygaard Christoffersen

  • ASD and PTSD in Rape Victims

    Ask Elklit;Dorte M Christiansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Shevlin
Mark Shevlin University of Ulster
Cherie Armour
Cherie Armour Queen's University Belfast
Philip Hyland
Philip Hyland National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Erik Simonsen
Erik Simonsen University of Copenhagen
Hans M. Koot
Hans M. Koot Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Zahava Solomon
Zahava Solomon Tel Aviv University
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Erik Lykke Mortensen University of Copenhagen
Mary P. Koss
Mary P. Koss University of Arizona
Miranda Olff
Miranda Olff University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees that can open doors to rewarding careers. Degrees in social work are closely linked to psychology, providing practical experience and a direct path to roles in community support, mental health, and counseling.

Exploring programs that offer the most value is a smart way to invest in your future. For example, you can check out the most valuable online social work degree programs in Indiana or consider the best value online social work degrees in Kansas for excellent opportunities and practical skill-building.

Online degrees provide flexibility for students balancing work and family commitments. You can also explore opportunities across regions, such as the most valuable online social work programs in Maryland or learn about the best value online social work programs in the Midwest. Each program offers unique strengths, and a degree in this field can lead to fulfilling career pathways, including mental health services, therapy, educational support, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Ask Elklit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles