World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
24141
World Ranking
15656
National Ranking
1442

Peter J. Ell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Ell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 564 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter J. Ell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Ell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Ell is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are documented primarily in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

Their recent published work includes the paper titled 50 years EJNM and EJNMMI, published in 2023 in the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. This publication has received citations, reflecting engagement within the academic community.

The scientist's publication record is associated with the following venue:

  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Recent scholarly activity centers on topics related to nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, as evidenced by the thematic focus of their publication.

Best Publications

  • Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial

    Robert Edward Mansel;Lesley Fallowfield;Mark Kissin;Amit Goyal

  • Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries

    Richard Sullivan;Jeffrey Peppercorn;Karol Sikora;John Zalcberg

  • Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence

    S. R. Underwood;C. Anagnostopoulos;M. Cerqueira;P. J. Ell

  • Recognition of mental state terms. Clinical findings in children with autism and a functional neuroimaging study of normal adults.

    Simon Baron-Cohen;Howard Ring;John Moriarty;Bettina Schmitz

  • Palliation of pain associated with metastatic bone cancer using samarium-153 lexidronam: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

    A N Serafini;S J Houston;I Resche;D P Quick

  • Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease

    Iciar Aviles-Olmos;John Dickson;Zinovia Kefalopoulou;Atbin Djamshidian

  • Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with combined PET/CT using 68Ga-DOTATATE (DOTA-DPhe1,Tyr3-octreotate) and 18F-FDG

    Irfan Kayani;Jamshed B. Bomanji;Ashley Groves;Gerard Conway

  • Samarium-153-Lexidronam complex for treatment of painful bone metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

    Oliver Sartor;Robert H Reid;Peter J Hoskin;Donald P Quick

  • 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response

    Simona Ben-Haim;Peter Ell

  • A dose-controlled study of 153Sm-Ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) in the treatment of patients with painful bone metastase

    I. Resche;J.-F. Chatal;A. Pecking;P. Ell

  • First in vivo evidence of an NMDA receptor deficit in medication-free schizophrenic patients.

    Lyn Pilowsky;Lyn Pilowsky;Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan;James Stone;K Erlandsson

  • Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology.

    JB Bomanji;DC Costa;PJ Ell

  • X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density.

    I. D. Cullum;P. J. Ell;J. P. Ryder

  • Motor and cognitive advantages persist 12 months after exenatide exposure in Parkinson's disease

    Iciar Aviles-Olmos;John Dickson;Zinovia Kefalopoulou;Atbin Djamshidian

  • Pathophysiology of Chronic Left Ventricular Dysfunction New Insights From the Measurement of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Glucose Utilization

    Norma V.S. Marinho;Bruce E. Keogh;Durval C. Costa;Adriaan A. Lammerstma

  • A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study.

    Akhil Kapur;Katherine A. Latus;Glyn Davies;Rhanju T. Dhawan

  • Clozapine, single photon emission tomography, and the D2 dopamine receptor blockade hypothesis of schizophrenia.

    L.S. Pilowsky;R.M. Murray;R.W. Kerwin;D.C. Costa

  • Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress in coronary artery disease.

    Dudley J. Pennell;S.Richard Underwood;Carla C. Manzara;R.Howard Swanton

  • Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Within Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

    Damian Wild;Jamshed B. Bomanji;Pascal Benkert;Helmut Maecke

  • The investigation of Alzheimer's disease with single photon emission tomography.

    A Burns;M P Philpot;D C Costa;P J Ell

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Kerwin
Robert Kerwin King's College London
Geraldo F. Busatto
Geraldo F. Busatto Universidade de São Paulo
Howard Ring
Howard Ring University of Cambridge
Brian Hutton
Brian Hutton Ottawa Hospital
Robert F. Miller
Robert F. Miller University College London
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Dudley J. Pennell
Dudley J. Pennell National Institutes of Health
James M. Stone
James M. Stone Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Dimitris Visvikis
Dimitris Visvikis University of Western Brittany
Vincent J. Cunningham
Vincent J. Cunningham University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for healthcare professionals grows, online education is making it easier to advance your career in medicine and allied health fields. There are now many affordable and flexible study options tailored for aspiring nurses and health specialists who require a balance between work, life, and academics.

Those interested in becoming nurse practitioners can explore cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs to find accredited pathways offering clinical and leadership skills. For students looking to start their nursing journey or transition from an RN role, numerous nursing school online options provide accessible entry points into the profession.

Nurses wishing to deepen their expertise and pursue research or academic positions may consider pursuing an online PhD nursing program. Additionally, registered nurses who want to expand their qualifications can find cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs that are both budget-friendly and respected.

Each of these online degree options can open new doors in the healthcare field, offering career flexibility and growth without the limitations of traditional, on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Ell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles