World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 124 3159 2946 1743 1604 1002 80389

Dudley J. Pennell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dudley J. Pennell between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dudley J. Pennell published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 24.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2024. 86 of the 1,039 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2024. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 45 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 34 publications 2005: 47 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 55 publications 2009: 52 publications 2010: 50 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 56 publications 2025: 30 publications
1984 2025

1,039 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dudley J. Pennell: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 7
1992 6
1993 11
1994 5
1995 8
1996 10
1997 14
1998 15
1999 21
2000 24
2001 20
2002 45
2003 41
2004 34
2005 47
2006 24
2007 28
2008 55
2009 52
2010 50
2011 36
2012 34
2013 41
2014 42
2015 36
2016 39
2017 30
2018 29
2019 27
2020 21
2021 37
2022 32
2023 25
2024 56
2025 30
Total 1,039
Download as CSV

Dudley J. Pennell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dudley J. Pennell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,002 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,002
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dudley J. Pennell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dudley J. Pennell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 124
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Dudley J. Pennell is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research activity is primarily concentrated within the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of scholarly work include Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work spans several specialized topics within cardiovascular and neuroimaging sciences. Major research themes include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies

Dudley J. Pennell has contributed to multiple frequently referenced scholarly venues, indicating active participation in key professional communities. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Their recent research articles demonstrate a focus on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and related clinical applications. Significant recent papers include:

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update, published in 2020 in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Genetic Architecture of Acute Myocarditis and the Overlap With Inherited Cardiomyopathy, 2022, Circulation
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Patients With COVID-19, 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Assessing left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to strain analysis, 2020, European Heart Journal

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sònia Nielles-Vallespin
  • Andrew D. Scott
  • Pedro Ferreira
  • Brian P. Halliday
  • Zohya Khalique

Dudley J. Pennell has been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association

    Manuel D. Cerqueira;Neil J. Weissman;Vasken Dilsizian;Alice K. Jacobs

  • Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload

    LJ Anderson;S Holden;B Davis;E Prescott

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Frank Grothues;Frank Grothues;Gillian C Smith;James C.C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • Truncations of Titin Causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy

    Daniel S. Herman;Lien Lam;Matthew R.G. Taylor;Libin Wang

  • Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

    Dudley J. Pennell;Udo P. Sechtem;Charles B. Higgins;Warren J. Manning

  • Differentiation of Heart Failure Related to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Coronary Artery Disease Using Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    J.A. McCrohon;J.C.C. Moon;S.K. Prasad;W.J. McKenna

  • Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable?

    N.G Bellenger;M.I Burgess;S.G Ray;A Lahiri

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy

    Ravi G. Assomull;Sanjay K. Prasad;Jonathan Lyne;Gillian Smith

  • Association of fibrosis with mortality and sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Ankur Gulati;Andrew Jabbour;Tevfik F. Ismail;Kaushik Guha

  • Normalized Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function by Steady State Free Precession Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Maceira Am;Prasad Sk;Khan M;Pennell Dj

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Alicia Maria Maceira;Jayshree Joshi;Sanjay Kumar Prasad;James Charles Moon

  • Reduction in Sample Size for Studies of Remodeling in Heart Failure by the Use of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Nicholas G. Bellenger;L. Ceri Davies;Jane M. Francis;Andrew J. S. Coats

  • Abnormal Subendocardial Perfusion in Cardiac Syndrome X Detected by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Jonathan R. Panting;Peter D. Gatehouse;Guang-Zhong Yang;Frank Grothues

  • Toward clinical risk assessment inhypertrophic cardiomyopathy withgadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    James C.C Moon;William J McKenna;Jane A McCrohon;Perry M Elliott

  • Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Rory O'Hanlon;Agata Grasso;Michael Roughton;James C. Moon

  • Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Frank Grothues;James C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger;Gillian S Smith

  • The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    James C. C. Moon;Emma Reed;Mary N. Sheppard;Andrew G. Elkington

  • The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology.

    Lisa Anderson;Dudley Pennell

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy☆

    F. Grothues;G.C. Smith;J.C.C. Moon

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Firmin
David N. Firmin National Institutes of Health
Sanjay K. Prasad
Sanjay K. Prasad National Institutes of Health
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
John B. Porter
John B. Porter University College London
Stuart A. Cook
Stuart A. Cook Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Michael A. Gatzoulis Imperial College London
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Hugh Montgomery
Hugh Montgomery University College London
Carlo Di Mario
Carlo Di Mario University of Florence
Mary N. Sheppard
Mary N. Sheppard St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA opens the door to a variety of online programs tailored to different goals and stages of study. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials conveniently, the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs offer a flexible pathway to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. This can provide a competitive edge in the workforce.

Those pursuing affordability can also compare options like the cheapest rn to bsn online degrees to keep costs manageable without sacrificing quality or accreditation. For nurses ready to take on advanced practice roles, consider the cheapest online fnp programs, which prepare students to become Family Nurse Practitioners.

Ambitious professionals may also explore academic and research careers with phd nursing programs online. These programs allow for deep specialization from anywhere in the country. Whichever path you choose, affordable online nursing degrees create opportunities to progress in the medical field while balancing your existing commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Dudley J. Pennell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles