World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
124
Citations
80389
World Ranking
3159
National Ranking
1744

Dudley J. Pennell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dudley J. Pennell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,002 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dudley J. Pennell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dudley J. Pennell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Dudley J. Pennell is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research activity is primarily concentrated within the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of scholarly work include Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work spans several specialized topics within cardiovascular and neuroimaging sciences. Major research themes include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies

Dudley J. Pennell has contributed to multiple frequently referenced scholarly venues, indicating active participation in key professional communities. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Their recent research articles demonstrate a focus on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and related clinical applications. Significant recent papers include:

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update, published in 2020 in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Genetic Architecture of Acute Myocarditis and the Overlap With Inherited Cardiomyopathy, 2022, Circulation
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Patients With COVID-19, 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Assessing left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to strain analysis, 2020, European Heart Journal

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sònia Nielles-Vallespin
  • Andrew D. Scott
  • Pedro Ferreira
  • Brian P. Halliday
  • Zohya Khalique

Dudley J. Pennell has been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association

    Manuel D. Cerqueira;Neil J. Weissman;Vasken Dilsizian;Alice K. Jacobs

  • Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload

    LJ Anderson;S Holden;B Davis;E Prescott

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Frank Grothues;Frank Grothues;Gillian C Smith;James C.C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • Truncations of Titin Causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy

    Daniel S. Herman;Lien Lam;Matthew R.G. Taylor;Libin Wang

  • Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

    Dudley J. Pennell;Udo P. Sechtem;Charles B. Higgins;Warren J. Manning

  • Differentiation of Heart Failure Related to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Coronary Artery Disease Using Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    J.A. McCrohon;J.C.C. Moon;S.K. Prasad;W.J. McKenna

  • Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable?

    N.G Bellenger;M.I Burgess;S.G Ray;A Lahiri

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy

    Ravi G. Assomull;Sanjay K. Prasad;Jonathan Lyne;Gillian Smith

  • Association of fibrosis with mortality and sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Ankur Gulati;Andrew Jabbour;Tevfik F. Ismail;Kaushik Guha

  • Normalized Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function by Steady State Free Precession Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Maceira Am;Prasad Sk;Khan M;Pennell Dj

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Alicia Maria Maceira;Jayshree Joshi;Sanjay Kumar Prasad;James Charles Moon

  • Reduction in Sample Size for Studies of Remodeling in Heart Failure by the Use of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Nicholas G. Bellenger;L. Ceri Davies;Jane M. Francis;Andrew J. S. Coats

  • Abnormal Subendocardial Perfusion in Cardiac Syndrome X Detected by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Jonathan R. Panting;Peter D. Gatehouse;Guang-Zhong Yang;Frank Grothues

  • Toward clinical risk assessment inhypertrophic cardiomyopathy withgadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    James C.C Moon;William J McKenna;Jane A McCrohon;Perry M Elliott

  • Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Rory O'Hanlon;Agata Grasso;Michael Roughton;James C. Moon

  • Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Frank Grothues;James C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger;Gillian S Smith

  • The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    James C. C. Moon;Emma Reed;Mary N. Sheppard;Andrew G. Elkington

  • The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology.

    Lisa Anderson;Dudley Pennell

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy☆

    F. Grothues;G.C. Smith;J.C.C. Moon

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Firmin
David N. Firmin National Institutes of Health
Sanjay K. Prasad
Sanjay K. Prasad National Institutes of Health
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
John B. Porter
John B. Porter University College London
Stuart A. Cook
Stuart A. Cook Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Michael A. Gatzoulis Imperial College London
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Hugh Montgomery
Hugh Montgomery University College London
Carlo Di Mario
Carlo Di Mario University of Florence
Mary N. Sheppard
Mary N. Sheppard St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA opens the door to a variety of online programs tailored to different goals and stages of study. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials conveniently, the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs offer a flexible pathway to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. This can provide a competitive edge in the workforce.

Those pursuing affordability can also compare options like the cheapest rn to bsn online degrees to keep costs manageable without sacrificing quality or accreditation. For nurses ready to take on advanced practice roles, consider the cheapest online fnp programs, which prepare students to become Family Nurse Practitioners.

Ambitious professionals may also explore academic and research careers with phd nursing programs online. These programs allow for deep specialization from anywhere in the country. Whichever path you choose, affordable online nursing degrees create opportunities to progress in the medical field while balancing your existing commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Dudley J. Pennell

Trending Scientists