World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
40308
World Ranking
10329
National Ranking
566

Eike Nagel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eike Nagel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 658 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eike Nagel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eike Nagel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eike Nagel is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, with a focus on radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, neurology, and infectious diseases. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics within cardiac imaging and diagnostics, advanced MRI techniques, cardiovascular function and risk factors, coronary interventions, long-term effects of COVID-19, cardiac valve diseases, and COVID-19 clinical research.

The scientist's most frequently published work appears in the following venues:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Valentina O. Püntmann
  • Andreas M. Zeiher
  • Simon S. Martin
  • Christophe Arendt
  • Andreas Rolf

Among selected recent papers co-authored or related to the scholar's field of study are:

  • "Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)", 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • "Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update", 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • "Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update", 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • "How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)", 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Long-term cardiac pathology in individuals with mild initial COVID-19 illness", 2022, Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Valentina O Püntmann;M. Ludovica Carerj;Imke Wieters;Masia Fahim

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Burkert Pieske;Carsten Tschöpe;Rudolf A de Boer;Alan G Fraser

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Stenoses

    W. Yong Kim;W. Yong Kim;Peter G. Danias;Matthias Stuber;Scott D. Flamm

  • Noninvasive Diagnosis of Ischemia-Induced Wall Motion Abnormalities With the Use of High-Dose Dobutamine Stress MRI Comparison With Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

    Eike Nagel;Hans B. Lehmkuhl;Wolfgang Bocksch;Christoph Klein

  • Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

    Eike Nagel;Christoph Klein;Ingo Paetsch;Sabine Hettwer

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update

    Christopher M. Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci;Scott D. Flamm

  • Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Nidal Al-Saadi;Eike Nagel;Michael Gross;Axel Bornstedt

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update

    Christopher M Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests Adenosine Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion Imaging

    Cosima Jahnke;Eike Nagel;Rolf Gebker;Thomas Kokocinski

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols

    Christopher M Kramer;Jorg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A. Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D. Flamm

  • Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

    Caroline Jaarsma;Tim Leiner;Sebastiaan C. Bekkers;Harry J. Crijns

  • Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Valentina O. Puntmann;Tobias Voigt;Zhong Chen;Manuel Mayr

  • T1-Mapping and Outcome in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure

    Valentina O. Puntmann;Gerry Carr-White;Andrew Jabbour;Chung-Yao Yu

  • Tissue Tracking Technology for Assessing Cardiac Mechanics: Principles, Normal Values, and Clinical Applications

    Piet Claus;Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Partho P. Sengupta

  • Alterations in the Local Myocardial Motion Pattern in Patients Suffering From Pressure Overload Due to Aortic Stenosis

    M Stuber;M B Scheidegger;S E Fischer;Eike Nagel

  • Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of right ventricular pressure-volume loops - In vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension

    Titus Kuehne;Sevim Yilmaz;Paul Steendijk;Phillip Moore

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis

    Richard A.P. Takx;Björn A. Blomberg;Hamza El Aidi;Jesse Habets

  • Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease

    Eike Nagel;John P. Greenwood;Gerry P. McCann;Nuno Bettencourt

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckart Fleck
Eckart Fleck Humboldt State University
Sven Plein
Sven Plein University of Leeds
René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Reza Razavi
Reza Razavi King's College London
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Matthias Stuber
Matthias Stuber University of Lausanne
Andreas M. Zeiher
Andreas M. Zeiher Goethe University Frankfurt
Peter Boesiger
Peter Boesiger ETH Zurich
Thomas J. Vogl
Thomas J. Vogl Goethe University Frankfurt
Raymond Y. Kwong
Raymond Y. Kwong Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but looking for alternative or supplementary pathways to a traditional medical degree, there are a variety of online programs that can help you launch or advance your career. Many students are now pursuing specialized roles by enrolling in programs such as affordable mha online programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in healthcare facilities. These options are increasingly attractive for their flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Nurses seeking advanced practice credentials can consider the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs. These programs often offer a streamlined path for registered nurses to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree entirely online.

Those interested in pharmaceutical careers might explore a 3-year online pharmd program, which allows for accelerated doctoral study in pharmacy with distance learning options. Additionally, management and data specialists can pursue a him bachelor's degree online, preparing them for essential roles in managing patient information and healthcare technology.

These online degrees represent flexible and affordable opportunities for building a rewarding healthcare career, whether you plan to work alongside medical doctors or in specialized administrative and clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Eike Nagel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles