World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
19302
World Ranking
19656
National Ranking
300

Matthias Stuber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Stuber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 470 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthias Stuber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Stuber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Radiology

Matthias Stuber mainly investigates Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Internal medicine, Nuclear medicine and Cardiology. His Magnetic resonance imaging study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cardiac function curve, Pathology, Myocardial infarction, Vascular disease and Compressed sensing. Many of his studies on Radiology involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Coronary arteries.

His research investigates the connection with Internal medicine and areas like Diabetes mellitus which intersect with concerns in Insulin and Asymptomatic. In his study, Steady-state free precession imaging and Image resolution is inextricably linked to Image quality, which falls within the broad field of Nuclear medicine. His research in Angiography intersects with topics in Coronary artery disease, Magnetic resonance angiography and Computer vision.

His most cited work include:

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Stenoses (811 citations)
  • Improved Coronary Artery Definition With T2-Weighted, Free-Breathing, Three-Dimensional Coronary MRA (393 citations)
  • Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young (379 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Magnetic resonance imaging, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Radiology and Nuclear medicine. His Magnetic resonance imaging study also includes

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance and related Pulse,
  • Biomedical engineering that connect with fields like Signal. Internal medicine is frequently linked to Free breathing in his study.

His work on Coronary artery disease, Artery and Angiology as part of general Cardiology study is frequently connected to In patient, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. As part of his studies on Radiology, Matthias Stuber frequently links adjacent subjects like Coronary arteries. In his work, Image resolution and Steady-state free precession imaging is strongly intertwined with Image quality, which is a subfield of Nuclear medicine.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (40.81%)
  • Internal medicine (37.61%)
  • Cardiology (36.11%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (37.61%)
  • Cardiology (36.11%)
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (40.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Matthias Stuber mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Cardiology, Magnetic resonance imaging, Nuclear medicine and Image quality. Magnetic resonance imaging is a primary field of his research addressed under Radiology. His Radiology research also works with subjects such as

  • Respiratory motion and related Motion correction,
  • Coronary arteries and related Signal-to-noise ratio.

As a member of one scientific family, Matthias Stuber mostly works in the field of Nuclear medicine, focusing on Lung and, on occasion, Noninvasive ventilation and Breathing. His Image quality research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Motion detection, Contrast, Respiratory system and Compressed sensing. His Artery study incorporates themes from Magnetic resonance angiography, Angiography and Vasodilation.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • 5D whole-heart sparse MRI. (70 citations)
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain (53 citations)
  • Reduced cortical oxygenation predicts a progressive decline of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. (53 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Cardiology

Matthias Stuber mostly deals with Magnetic resonance imaging, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Image quality and Coronary artery disease. His Magnetic resonance imaging research is classified as research in Radiology. His Radiology research includes themes of Respiratory motion and Compressed sensing.

His studies deal with areas such as Nuclear medicine and Respiratory system as well as Image quality. His Coronary artery disease research integrates issues from Endothelium, Coronary circulation and Endothelial dysfunction. His Artery research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Inflammation and Magnetic resonance angiography.

Best Publications

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Stenoses

    W. Yong Kim;W. Yong Kim;Peter G. Danias;Matthias Stuber;Scott D. Flamm

  • Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young

    David A. Bluemke;Stephan Achenbach;Matthew Budoff;Thomas C. Gerber

  • Improved Coronary Artery Definition With T2-Weighted, Free-Breathing, Three-Dimensional Coronary MRA

    René M. Botnar;Matthias Stuber;Peter G. Danias;Kraig V. Kissinger

  • Noninvasive Coronary Vessel Wall and Plaque Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    René M. Botnar;Matthias Stuber;Kraig V. Kissinger;Won Y. Kim

  • Alterations in the Local Myocardial Motion Pattern in Patients Suffering From Pressure Overload Due to Aortic Stenosis

    M Stuber;M B Scheidegger;S E Fischer;Eike Nagel

  • Double-oblique free-breathing high resolution three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography

    Matthias Stuber;Matthias Stuber;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Peter G. Danias;Daniel K. Sodickson

  • Three-Dimensional Black-Blood Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Coronary Vessel Wall Imaging Detects Positive Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Nonsignificant Coronary Artery Disease

    W. Yong Kim;Matthias Stuber;Peter Börnert;Kraig V. Kissinger

  • Soap-Bubble visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms

    Alex Etienne;Alex Etienne;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Arianne M.C. van Muiswinkel;Peter Boesiger

  • Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations.

    Matthias Stuber;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Peter G. Danias;Kraig V. Kissinger

  • Free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA with 3D radial SSFP and self-navigated image reconstruction.

    C. Stehning;P. Börnert;K. Nehrke;H. Eggers

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overestimates Ferumoxide-Labeled Stem Cell Survival After Transplantation in the Heart

    John Terrovitis;Matthias Stuber;Amr Youssef;Steve Preece

  • Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis

    E Nagel;M Stuber;B Burkhard;S E Fischer

  • Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans

    Matthias Stuber;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Stefan E. Fischer;Rolf Lamerichs

  • Magnetic resonance–guided, real-time targeted delivery and imaging of magnetocapsules immunoprotecting pancreatic islet cells

    Brad P Barnett;Aravind Arepally;Parag V Karmarkar;Di Qian

  • Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON)

    Matthias Stuber;Wesley D. Gilson;Michael Schär;Michael Schär;Dorota A. Kedziorek

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Adolescents and Young Adults With Kawasaki Disease

    Gerald F. Greil;Matthias Stuber;René M. Botnar;Kraig V. Kissinger

  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Yin Ge;Kevin Steel;Scott Bingham

  • Contrast agent-enhanced, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

    Matthias Stuber;Matthias Stuber;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Peter G. Danias;Michael V. McConnell

  • B1-insensitive T2 preparation for improved coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T.

    Reza Nezafat;Reza Nezafat;Matthias Stuber;Ronald Ouwerkerk;Ahmed M. Gharib

  • Reduced cortical oxygenation predicts a progressive decline of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease.

    Menno Pruijm;Bastien Milani;Edward Pivin;Agata Podhajska

Frequent Co-Authors

René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Warren J. Manning
Warren J. Manning Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Peter Boesiger
Peter Boesiger ETH Zurich
Gary Gerstenblith
Gary Gerstenblith Johns Hopkins University
Michel Burnier
Michel Burnier University of Lausanne
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Rolf W. Günther
Rolf W. Günther Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Otto M. Hess
Otto M. Hess University of Bern
Jerry L. Prince
Jerry L. Prince Johns Hopkins University
Eckart Fleck
Eckart Fleck Humboldt State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA often leads students to consider various online health career programs. Earning an advanced degree online can help save time and money, without sacrificing the quality of education. Options like Healthcare Administration, Doctor of Pharmacy, or a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) are increasingly popular and offer clear career benefits.

For those interested in leadership or administration roles, pursuing one of the cheapest mha programs online or the most affordable online mha programs could be an ideal pathway. These programs provide essential management skills for hospital and clinical settings.

Aspiring advanced practice nurses might consider enrolling in one of the cheapest dnp programs. Earning your DNP online is a flexible way to advance clinical expertise or move into leadership. Similarly, pharmacy professionals can accelerate their credentials through online pharmacy school programs, opening doors across clinical, research, and business sectors.

Choosing an affordable, reputable online health degree can lead to rewarding careers and help address the rising demand for skilled healthcare professionals in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Stuber

Trending Scientists