World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
10909
World Ranking
9675
National Ranking
5105

Stephanie Cacioppo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie Cacioppo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephanie Cacioppo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie Cacioppo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephanie Cacioppo is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and focuses primarily on the field of Medicine with a number of publications spanning various specialized subfields.

Their research encompasses areas such as Clinical Psychology, Rheumatology, Genetics, Hematology, and Health. Key topics addressed in their work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research, Health disparities and outcomes, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Youth Substance Use and School Attendance, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research.

Frequent publication venues for Stephanie Cacioppo include:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Genes
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Some of the recent papers credited to Stephanie Cacioppo are:

  • "Battling the Modern Behavioral Epidemic of Loneliness," 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "The Type I interferon antiviral gene program is impaired by lockdown and preserved by caregiving," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Hypoxia-Inducible Factor in Renal Cell Carcinoma: From Molecular Insights to Targeted Therapies," 2024, Genes
  • "005 HSDD, Flibanserin, and Eye Dynamics: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial," 2020, The Journal of Sexual Medicine
  • "AB0490 PREVALENCE OF RISK FACTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS, MALIGNANCY OR THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS UNDER JAK INHIBITORS IN A REAL-LIFE MONOCENTRIC COHORT," 2023, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Collaborations have been established with a number of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ivan Giovannini
  • John T. Cacioppo
  • Luca Quartuccio
  • Salvatore De Vita
  • Silvano Sacco

The scope of Stephanie Cacioppo's work reflects a multidisciplinary approach linking clinical research, genetics, and epidemiology, with significant contributions to studies on immune response, psychological health, and chronic disease management.

Best Publications

  • Loneliness: Clinical Import and Interventions

    Stephanie Cacioppo;Angela J. Grippo;Sarah London;Luc Goossens

  • Social Relationships and Health: The Toxic Effects of Perceived Social Isolation

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;John P. Capitanio;Steven W. Cole

  • The growing problem of loneliness.

    John T Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • Toward a neurology of loneliness.

    Stephanie Cacioppo;John P. Capitanio;John T. Cacioppo

  • Evolutionary Mechanisms for Loneliness

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;Dorret I. Boomsma

  • Loneliness in the Modern Age: An Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness (ETL)

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;Gian C. Gonzaga;Elizabeth L. Ogburn

  • Battling the Modern Behavioral Epidemic of Loneliness: Suggestions for Research and Interventions.

    Dilip V. Jeste;Ellen E. Lee;Ellen E. Lee;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Imaging Studies of Social Rejection

    Stephanie Cacioppo;Chris Frum;Erik Asp;Robin M Weiss

  • The speed of morality: a high-density electrical neuroimaging study.

    Jean Decety;Stephanie Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • Loneliness across phylogeny and a call for comparative studies and animal models.

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;Steven W. Cole;John P. Capitanio

  • Older adults reporting social isolation or loneliness show poorer cognitive function 4 years later

    John T Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Respondent Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants.

    Elizabeth A. Necka;Stephanie Cacioppo;Greg J. Norman;John T. Cacioppo

  • The Common Neural Bases Between Sexual Desire and Love: A Multilevel Kernel Density fMRI Analysis

    Stephanie Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;Francesco Bianchi‐Demicheli;Chris Frum;James G. Pfaus

  • Loneliness and implicit attention to social threat: A high-performance electrical neuroimaging study

    Stephanie Cacioppo;Munirah Bangee;Stephen Balogh;Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez

  • You are in sync with me: neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner.

    S. Cacioppo;H. Zhou;G. Monteleone;E.a. Majka

  • Implicit attention to negative social, in contrast to nonsocial, words in the Stroop task differs between individuals high and low in loneliness: Evidence from event-related brain microstates.

    Stephanie Cacioppo;Stephen Balogh;John T. Cacioppo

  • Perceived social isolation is associated with altered functional connectivity in neural networks associated with tonic alertness and executive control.

    Elliot A. Layden;John T. Cacioppo;Stephanie Cacioppo;Stefano F. Cappa

  • Reciprocal Influences Between Loneliness and Self-Centeredness: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis in a Population-Based Sample of African American, Hispanic, and Caucasian Adults:

    John T Cacioppo;Hsi Yuan Chen;Stephanie Cacioppo

  • Building social resilience in soldiers: A double dissociative randomized controlled study.

    John T. Cacioppo;Amy B. Adler;Paul B. Lester;Dennis McGurk

  • The Genetics of Loneliness: Linking Evolutionary Theory to Genome-Wide Genetics, Epigenetics, and Social Science

    Luc Goossens;Eeske van Roekel;Maaike Verhagen;John T. Cacioppo

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John P. Capitanio
John P. Capitanio University of California, Davis
Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven
Jean-Marie Annoni
Jean-Marie Annoni University of Fribourg
Abraham A. Palmer
Abraham A. Palmer University of California, San Diego
Pierre Fontanillas
Pierre Fontanillas 23andMe (United States)
Najaf Amin
Najaf Amin University of Oxford
Jouke-Jan Hottenga
Jouke-Jan Hottenga Hamad bin Khalifa University
Gonneke Willemsen
Gonneke Willemsen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in pursuing Psychology in the USA, there are a variety of online degree options that can set you on the path toward a rewarding career. Online psychology and counseling programs offer flexibility, making it easier to balance your studies with your existing commitments. These programs provide foundational knowledge and practical skills that prepare you for roles such as counselor, therapist, or mental health specialist.

Many students look for the fastest way to become a counselor in Michigan or seek out the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Minnesota. Others are interested in Mississippi accelerated counseling programs or exploring the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Missouri. Comparing these options can help you find the right pathway for your goals.

When choosing your route, consider state licensure requirements, available specialization areas, and whether accelerated or traditional timelines fit your needs. With the right online degree, you can start making a difference in people’s lives sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie Cacioppo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles