World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 32 985 981 163 161 242 3614
Psychology 35 9966 9332 5251 4798 190 4128

Justin C. Strickland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin C. Strickland between 2013 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin C. Strickland published across 14 years, from 2013 to 2026, averaging 18.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2021. 30 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2021. 2013: 1 publication 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
2013 2026

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin C. Strickland: publications per year, 2013 to 2026
Year Publications
2013 1
2014 9
2015 11
2016 12
2017 13
2018 9
2019 17
2020 24
2021 36
2022 35
2023 32
2024 35
2025 29
2026 1
Total 264
Download as CSV

Justin C. Strickland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 190
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin C. Strickland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Justin C. Strickland is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and psychology. Their research spans multiple domains within these areas, including epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's recent publications cover various aspects of behavioral health, substance use, and psychological constructs. Notable papers include:

  • Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument. (2020, Psychological Review)
  • Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with COVID-19 skepticism in the United States. (2021, Current Psychology)
  • Sex differences in the acute effects of oral and vaporized cannabis among healthy adults. (2020, Addiction Biology)
  • An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19. (2020, Journal of Health Communication)

Strickland's research topics emphasize substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, decision-making and behavioral economics, cannabis and cannabinoid research, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, mental health research topics, and opioid use disorder treatment.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Derek D. Reed
  • Jill A. Rabinowitz (26 collaborations)
  • Brett W. Gelino (23 collaborations)
  • Matthew W. Johnson (22 collaborations)
  • William W. Stoops (22 collaborations)

Their research is regularly published in a set of recurring scientific venues, including:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (19 publications)
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (19 publications)
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (10 publications)
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (8 publications)
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset (7 publications)

Best Publications

  • The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    Justin C Strickland;William W Stoops

  • The anxiolytic effects of resistance exercise.

    Justin Charles Strickland;Mark Andrew Smith

  • The effects of sex, estrous cycle, and social contact on cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats

    Ryan T. Lacy;Ryan T. Lacy;Justin C. Strickland;Max A. Feinstein;Andrea M. Robinson

  • Unique prediction of cannabis use severity and behaviors by delay discounting and behavioral economic demand.

    Justin C. Strickland;Joshua A. Lile;William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops

  • Sex differences in the acute effects of oral and vaporized cannabis among healthy adults

    Dennis J. Sholler;Justin C. Strickland;Tory R. Spindle;Elise M. Weerts

  • The Effects of Social Contact on Drug Use: Behavioral Mechanisms Controlling Drug Intake

    Justin C. Strickland;Mark A. Smith

  • Set and Setting: A Randomized Study of Different Musical Genres in Supporting Psychedelic Therapy

    Justin C. Strickland;Albert Garcia-Romeu;Matthew W. Johnson

  • Comparing exponential and exponentiated models of drug demand in cocaine users.

    Justin C Strickland;Joshua A Lile;Craig R Rush;William W Stoops

  • Naturalistic psilocybin use is associated with persisting improvements in mental health and wellbeing: results from a prospective, longitudinal survey

    Unknown

  • Utilizing the commodity purchase task to evaluate behavioral economic demand for illicit substances: a review and meta-analysis.

    Justin C Strickland;Ethan M Campbell;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder, drinking to cope, and harmful alcohol use: A multivariate meta-analysis of the self-medication hypothesis.

    Unknown

  • Regulation of cocaine craving by cognitive strategies in an online sample of cocaine users.

    Justin C. Strickland;Anna R. Reynolds;William W. Stoops

  • Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study

    Unknown

  • Quantifying the Impact of Public Perceptions on Vaccine Acceptance Using Behavioral Economics.

    Steven R Hursh;Justin C Strickland;Lindsay P Schwartz;Derek D Reed

  • The continued rise of methamphetamine use among people who use heroin in the United States.

    Justin C. Strickland;William W. Stoops;Kelly E. Dunn;Kirsten E. Smith

  • Feasibility, acceptability, and validity of crowdsourcing for collecting longitudinal alcohol use data.

    Justin C. Strickland;William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops

  • Evaluating non-medical prescription opioid demand using commodity purchase tasks: test-retest reliability and incremental validity.

    Justin C Strickland;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops

  • Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Effects of Medicinal Cannabis Use in an Observational Trial

    Erin L. Martin;Justin C. Strickland;Nicolas J. Schlienz;Joel Munson

  • The effects of social learning on the acquisition of cocaine self-administration

    Mark A. Smith;Ryan T. Lacy;Justin C. Strickland

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Stoops
William W. Stoops University of Kentucky
Craig R. Rush
Craig R. Rush University of Kentucky
Matthew W. Johnson
Matthew W. Johnson Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Carrie B. Oser
Carrie B. Oser University of Kentucky
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Marcel O. Bonn-Miller
Marcel O. Bonn-Miller University of Pennsylvania
Brady Reynolds
Brady Reynolds University of Kentucky
David H. Epstein
David H. Epstein National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in studying psychology but need flexibility? Many students are now choosing online counseling degrees for their convenience, speed, and affordability. As demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, online programs can help you jumpstart your career while balancing other responsibilities.

If you’re eager to earn your credentials quickly, consider exploring the fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in Ohio. Those based in Texas may also look into Texas accelerated counseling degrees online to begin working sooner.

Cost is another major factor when choosing a degree. Many institutions now offer high-quality, budget-friendly options. For instance, students searching for lower tuition rates should review affordable counseling programs in Arizona and the most affordable counseling degree programs in Berkeley to find programs that suit both their career goals and budget.

Whether you aim to become a counselor, therapist, or work in mental health advocacy, online degrees can provide a flexible pathway to a wide range of careers in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Justin C. Strickland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles