World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
32
Citations
3614
World Ranking
985
National Ranking
163

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4128
World Ranking
9966
National Ranking
5251

Justin C. Strickland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Justin C. Strickland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Justin C. Strickland is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and psychology. Their research spans multiple domains within these areas, including epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's recent publications cover various aspects of behavioral health, substance use, and psychological constructs. Notable papers include:

  • Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument. (2020, Psychological Review)
  • Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with COVID-19 skepticism in the United States. (2021, Current Psychology)
  • Sex differences in the acute effects of oral and vaporized cannabis among healthy adults. (2020, Addiction Biology)
  • An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19. (2020, Journal of Health Communication)

Strickland's research topics emphasize substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, decision-making and behavioral economics, cannabis and cannabinoid research, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, mental health research topics, and opioid use disorder treatment.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Derek D. Reed
  • Jill A. Rabinowitz (26 collaborations)
  • Brett W. Gelino (23 collaborations)
  • Matthew W. Johnson (22 collaborations)
  • William W. Stoops (22 collaborations)

Their research is regularly published in a set of recurring scientific venues, including:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (19 publications)
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (19 publications)
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (10 publications)
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (8 publications)
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset (7 publications)

Best Publications

  • The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    Justin C Strickland;William W Stoops

  • Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Samuel F Acuff;Justin C Strickland;Jalie A Tucker;James G Murphy

  • Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument

    Justin C. Strickland;Matthew W. Johnson

  • The anxiolytic effects of resistance exercise.

    Justin Charles Strickland;Mark Andrew Smith

  • The effects of sex, estrous cycle, and social contact on cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats

    Ryan T. Lacy;Ryan T. Lacy;Justin C. Strickland;Max A. Feinstein;Andrea M. Robinson

  • Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with COVID-19 skepticism in the United States.

    Carl A. Latkin;Lauren Dayton;Meghan Moran;Justin C. Strickland

  • Unique prediction of cannabis use severity and behaviors by delay discounting and behavioral economic demand.

    Justin C. Strickland;Joshua A. Lile;William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops

  • Sex differences in the acute effects of oral and vaporized cannabis among healthy adults

    Dennis J. Sholler;Justin C. Strickland;Tory R. Spindle;Elise M. Weerts

  • An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19.

    Carl A. Latkin;Lauren Dayton;Justin C. Strickland;Brian Colon

  • The Effects of Social Contact on Drug Use: Behavioral Mechanisms Controlling Drug Intake

    Justin C. Strickland;Mark A. Smith

  • Set and Setting: A Randomized Study of Different Musical Genres in Supporting Psychedelic Therapy

    Justin C. Strickland;Albert Garcia-Romeu;Matthew W. Johnson

  • Comparing exponential and exponentiated models of drug demand in cocaine users.

    Justin C Strickland;Joshua A Lile;Craig R Rush;William W Stoops

  • Naturalistic psilocybin use is associated with persisting improvements in mental health and wellbeing: results from a prospective, longitudinal survey

    Unknown

  • Utilizing the commodity purchase task to evaluate behavioral economic demand for illicit substances: a review and meta-analysis.

    Justin C Strickland;Ethan M Campbell;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder, drinking to cope, and harmful alcohol use: A multivariate meta-analysis of the self-medication hypothesis.

    Unknown

  • Regulation of cocaine craving by cognitive strategies in an online sample of cocaine users.

    Justin C. Strickland;Anna R. Reynolds;William W. Stoops

  • Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study

    Unknown

  • Quantifying the Impact of Public Perceptions on Vaccine Acceptance Using Behavioral Economics.

    Steven R Hursh;Justin C Strickland;Lindsay P Schwartz;Derek D Reed

  • The continued rise of methamphetamine use among people who use heroin in the United States.

    Justin C. Strickland;William W. Stoops;Kelly E. Dunn;Kirsten E. Smith

  • Feasibility, acceptability, and validity of crowdsourcing for collecting longitudinal alcohol use data.

    Justin C. Strickland;William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops

  • Evaluating non-medical prescription opioid demand using commodity purchase tasks: test-retest reliability and incremental validity.

    Justin C Strickland;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops

  • Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Effects of Medicinal Cannabis Use in an Observational Trial

    Erin L. Martin;Justin C. Strickland;Nicolas J. Schlienz;Joel Munson

  • The effects of social learning on the acquisition of cocaine self-administration

    Mark A. Smith;Ryan T. Lacy;Justin C. Strickland

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Stoops
William W. Stoops University of Kentucky
Craig R. Rush
Craig R. Rush University of Kentucky
Matthew W. Johnson
Matthew W. Johnson Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Carrie B. Oser
Carrie B. Oser University of Kentucky
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Marcel O. Bonn-Miller
Marcel O. Bonn-Miller University of Pennsylvania
Brady Reynolds
Brady Reynolds University of Kentucky
David H. Epstein
David H. Epstein National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in studying psychology but need flexibility? Many students are now choosing online counseling degrees for their convenience, speed, and affordability. As demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, online programs can help you jumpstart your career while balancing other responsibilities.

If you’re eager to earn your credentials quickly, consider exploring the fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in Ohio. Those based in Texas may also look into Texas accelerated counseling degrees online to begin working sooner.

Cost is another major factor when choosing a degree. Many institutions now offer high-quality, budget-friendly options. For instance, students searching for lower tuition rates should review affordable counseling programs in Arizona and the most affordable counseling degree programs in Berkeley to find programs that suit both their career goals and budget.

Whether you aim to become a counselor, therapist, or work in mental health advocacy, online degrees can provide a flexible pathway to a wide range of careers in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Justin C. Strickland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles