World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 8004 7471 4280 3894 187 5239

William W. Stoops publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William W. Stoops between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William W. Stoops published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2015. 32 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2015. 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 18 publications
2003 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William W. Stoops: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 5
2004 5
2005 9
2006 3
2007 7
2008 4
2009 7
2010 7
2011 12
2012 4
2013 7
2014 12
2015 23
2016 14
2017 12
2018 8
2019 13
2020 8
2021 9
2022 14
2023 12
2024 14
2025 18
Total 227
Download as CSV

William W. Stoops publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Stoops sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 187
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

William W. Stoops D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Stoops sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William W. Stoops is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and neuroscience, focusing notably on substance use and related behavioral and pharmacological aspects.

Their work primarily covers the main fields of study of Medicine and Neuroscience, with substantial contributions in more specialized subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research topics center around Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Sleep and Wakefulness Research.

Key frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Joshua A. Lile
  • Justin C. Strickland
  • Thomas Shellenberg
  • Sean D. Regnier
  • Craig R. Rush

William W. Stoops has published extensively in several venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent papers by William W. Stoops include:

  • An update on the clinical pharmacology of methylphenidate: therapeutic efficacy, abuse potential and future considerations (2020), published in Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
  • The continued rise of methamphetamine use among people who use heroin in the United States (2021), published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study (2022), published in Addiction
  • Oral Enrichment of Streptococcus and its Role in Systemic Inflammation Related to Monocyte Activation in Humans with Cocaine Use Disorder (2021), published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience (2022), published in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

In 2013, William W. Stoops was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), reflecting professional acknowledgment within the field.

Best Publications

  • The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    Justin C Strickland;William W Stoops

  • Evaluation of the “Pipeline” for Development of Medications for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Review of Translational Preclinical, Human Laboratory, and Clinical Trial Research

    Paul W. Czoty;William W. Stoops;Craig R. Rush

  • An internet-based abstinence reinforcement smoking cessation intervention in rural smokers.

    William W. Stoops;Jesse Dallery;Nell M. Fields;Paul A. Nuzzo

  • Individual and network factors associated with non-fatal overdose among rural Appalachian drug users.

    Jennifer R. Havens;Carrie B. Oser;Carrie B. Oser;Hannah K. Knudsen;Michelle Lofwall

  • Unique prediction of cannabis use severity and behaviors by delay discounting and behavioral economic demand.

    Justin C. Strickland;Joshua A. Lile;William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops

  • Risperidone Attenuates the Discriminative-Stimulus Effects of d-Amphetamine in Humans

    Craig R. Rush;William W. Stoops;Lon R. Hays;Paul E. A. Glaser

  • The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: influence of sensation-seeking status.

    William W. Stoops;Joshua A. Lile;C. Glenn Robbins;Catherine A. Martin

  • Reinforcing effects of modafinil: influence of dose and behavioral demands following drug administration.

    William W. Stoops;Joshua A. Lile;Mark T. Fillmore;Paul E. A. Glaser

  • Cocaine choice in humans during D-amphetamine maintenance.

    Craig R. Rush;William W. Stoops;Rajkamur J. Sevak;Lon R. Hays

  • Methylphenidate increases cigarette smoking

    Craig R. Rush;Stephen T. Higgins;Andrea R. Vansickel;William W. Stoops

  • Intravenous oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine in recreational opioid users: abuse potential and relative potencies

    William W. Stoops;William W. Stoops;Kevin W. Hatton;Michelle R. Lofwall;Paul A. Nuzzo

  • Reinforcing, subject-rated, performance and physiological effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in stimulant abusing humans.

    William W. Stoops;Paul E.A. Glaser;Mark T. Fillmore;Craig R. Rush

  • Aripiprazole Attenuates the Discriminative-Stimulus and Subject-Rated Effects of D -Amphetamine in Humans

    Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops;William W Stoops;Andrea R Vansickel;Andrea R Vansickel;Paul E A Glaser

  • Fixation Time is a Sensitive Measure of Cocaine Cue Attentional Bias

    Katherine R. Marks;Walter Roberts;William W. Stoops;Erika Pike;Erika Pike

  • An update on the clinical pharmacology of methylphenidate: therapeutic efficacy, abuse potential and future considerations.

    Thomas P Shellenberg;Thomas P Shellenberg;William W Stoops;William W Stoops;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;Craig R Rush;Craig R Rush

  • Agonist Replacement for Stimulant Dependence: A Review of Clinical Research

    William W Stoops;Craig R Rush

  • Comparing exponential and exponentiated models of drug demand in cocaine users.

    Justin C Strickland;Joshua A Lile;Craig R Rush;William W Stoops

  • Social and environmental influences on opioid sensitivity in rats: importance of an opioid’s relative efficacy at the mu-receptor

    Mark A. Smith;Kara A. Chisholm;Paul A. Bryant;Jennifer L. Greene

  • Cocaine effects during d-amphetamine maintenance: A human laboratory analysis of safety, tolerability and efficacy

    Craig R. Rush;William W. Stoops;Lon R. Hays

  • Discriminative Stimulus and Subject-Rated Effects of Methamphetamine, d-Amphetamine, Methylphenidate, and Triazolam in Methamphetamine-Trained Humans

    Rajkumar J. Sevak;William W. Stoops;Lon R. Hays;Craig R. Rush

  • Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.

    William W. Stoops

  • Utilizing the commodity purchase task to evaluate behavioral economic demand for illicit substances: a review and meta-analysis.

    Justin C Strickland;Ethan M Campbell;Joshua A Lile;Joshua A Lile;William W Stoops

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig R. Rush
Craig R. Rush University of Kentucky
Justin C. Strickland
Justin C. Strickland Johns Hopkins University
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Mark T. Fillmore
Mark T. Fillmore University of Kentucky
Jennifer R. Havens
Jennifer R. Havens University of Kentucky
Carrie B. Oser
Carrie B. Oser University of Kentucky
Jesse Dallery
Jesse Dallery University of Florida
Brady Reynolds
Brady Reynolds University of Kentucky
Brenda M. Booth
Brenda M. Booth University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Aimee L. McRae-Clark
Aimee L. McRae-Clark Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens doors to a diverse range of opportunities beyond traditional roles. Many students are now exploring online psychology and related behavioral science degrees, which provide the flexibility and specialized training to launch dynamic careers in mental health, education, and social services.

One prominent career pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The path typically includes earning a relevant graduate degree, completing supervised experience, and passing a national certification exam. However, specific requirements can vary between locations. For instance, aspiring professionals can review Saint Paul bcba requirements, bcba certification requirements in San Antonio, San Diego bcba requirements, and learn about how to become a bcba in San Francisco to understand local regulations and options.

With growing demand for mental health professionals, pursuing online degrees or BCBA certification can lead to rewarding and impactful career pathways. By researching requirements in your area and choosing accredited programs, you can build the foundation for ongoing professional growth in this evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing William W. Stoops

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles